Zero can't be the worst when this exists.
>>384420697
It's kinda funny how people are excited for 2 when Command and Zero both took major gameplay ideas from it.
>>384421062
I actually liked 2 from the ROM I played of it, but it's still not nearly as good as the original or 64.
>>384420697
>yfw Kursed
>>384421496
What do you think her tits feel like?
>>384421618
Like darkness and PMS.
>>384421618
Bags of evil sand.
>>384421165
I had a lot of fun playing SF64 on myWiias a kid, but I think SF2 is even more fun
>>384420697
I had a good time in the online dogfights, wish zero had online.
Command actually has better controls
I'm not even joking
This game was fun as fuck for multiplayer. What are you talking about?
>>384422196
Controls are fine, but why does the touchscreen have to do everything?
>>384421062
2 actually had did the Walker right
>>384420697
Agreed. Command did some things right but man, was it tedious when it went wrong.
>>384422746
Nice controls was about it, why were a certain amounts of turns needed?
best thing about Command is the fact you can play as other people in the main game other then Fox.
>>384423593
2 you can too actually.
>>384424249
i know that. can't wait to just part Falco and i think Fay or Fox and just go right though that game as soon as i get it.
Zero is only bad because of the controls.
It is objectively the best Star Fox game in the series. If it wasn't attached to such a horrible system and was given the Switch port treatment, /v/ would be praising it to hell and back.
>>384424941
The story is terrible and the controls in terms of what you can do were a step back in almos
Tying the roll to the boost guage and making it continuous while also removing the ability to turn the arwing on it's side forced the game to have simpler gameplay since your control over your ship was so loose.
Nothing but all range mode was a dissapointment as well and meant the game lacked meaningful level design.
The maps themselves were decent from a strategy game standpoint, but since baiting enemy strings was so easy it's usually just a chore of mopping up a bunch of samey encounters with X amount of enemy type.
>>384424941
I actually agree, but Zero's half assed controls nearly ruin it.
>>384424941
>>384425565
Goddammit I'm a fucking tard who can't read.
For some reason I thought you said command.
Don't mind me sperging out over a different terrible game.
>>384424941
the only good things from Zero was that one stand alone game, Roadmaster, the designs, Star Wolf fights, Corneria and Sector Omega
everything else is shit
>>384425651
All is fair anon
>>384420697
Command has better controls than Zero though.
>>384424941
The controls are only bad if you're bad at video games.
>>384424941
quite the contrary i think. I really liked the controls, the thing that ruined the game for me was the all range mode. It was complete shit and the worst part of it was that it was half of the levels
Post Krystal
>>384426041
go back to /vg/ and discord, Gor.
>>384426041
They weren't "bad" just unintuitive.
>>384430090
As in it wasn't as easy to control as generic action games?
The point of the game is that you are piloting mechanical vehicles. Miyamoto stated several times that he wanted Starfox to be his Thunderbirds homage. So since the game is more about the vehicles and not furry pandering, it's normal to see that the controls are "organic" or dumb shit like piloting in Star Wars EA Battlefront.
Fuck you, Command was a masterpiece. Easily the best game in the series.
>>384420697
Great game, only played wifi with other plays once in 2009. Because the multiplayer was dead as hell. I personally dislike most of the endings, only two of them was great.
>>384432992
All of the endings have their own strengths and weaknesses. But that's the beauty of it. The choices are all up to you.