Why did this even exist?

>>384412704
To be better than God Hand

File: God_Hand_vs_Party_Babyz.jpg (190KB, 1007x891px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1007x891px

Obligatory.

>>384412704

Rigorous demographic focus testing.

File: Yeb.png (822KB, 662x800px) Image search: [Google]

822KB, 662x800px

>>384412704
>Ever marketing things towards babies
Why? Do parents actually buy this crap?

>>384412704
Its a really good game.

>>384412864
>ubisoft
>ign

Didn't you know IGN and GameSpot only survive in 2017 because they get paid to shill games with positive reviews?

As a Nintendo game collector, do you think people collect all the shovelware still just so they can say they have a complete collection?

>>384412864
Why do people insist on posting this meaningless image? Games are scored against each other only when they're comparable. This juxtaposition proves literally nothing other than the fact that some entitled dipshit thinks God Hand should get a high score because it's God Hand and Party Babyz should get a low score because it's Party Babyz.

>>384412704

It's marketed to Nintendo's core audience

>>384413335
>unironically defending party babyz
jesus christ

>>384413397
The Wii had tons of games for little babies, what's the issue? Should it get a low score because it's for little children?

And even then Party Babyz isn't the problem here, the fact that it's being stacked up against God Hand for no reason is. They're not comparable at all. The difference between the two scores is meaningless.

>>384413335
I always seen it as an amusing joke, why are you taking it seriously?

File: 23526.jpg (11KB, 228x221px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 228x221px

>>384412864
>Gameplay
>2.5 vs 7.5
godhandfags BTFO

>>384412704
really nice game for toddlercon

>>384413335
What does this change?

God Hand is a good game when stacked up against comparable games

Party Babyz is a mediocre baby game and fails when stacked up against patrician baby games in the baby game genre for babies

File: 1466903481473.jpg (101KB, 400x394px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 400x394px

>>384412864
>The art direction is very appealing, though a bit immature for the game's content

How

It's a game about fucking dancing babies

>>384416374
>game about fucking dancing babies
lewd

>>384416479
You sir, just made me chortle heartily

>ubisoft

>>384416586
Thanks fellow redditor! Tis always a grand pleasure to run into another gentlesir!

*tips hat*

>>384412704
Playin this with friends, i never laughed harder in my life

>>384416097
I demand listings of these patrician baby games in the baby game genre for babies

>>384412704
>>384412864
>a PS2 game has lower rating than a Wii game
based critics once again proving that nintendo never does wrong,