REEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>384385712
Wait, is an 84 really supposed to be bad?
>>384387176
We're living in some clusterfuck of a timeline where 85 and above is good, while 84 and below is shit.
The dissonance if horrible.
>>384387176
For Nintendo games anything lower than 90 is code for "dog shit"
>>384387292
And anything above 90 is paid.
>>384387176
TENATTATEN
its okay
>>384387176
that won't stop shitposters
>>384387337
>For Nintendo games anything lower than 90 is code for "dog shit"
And anything 90 or higher is paid reviews or Nintendo bonus
>>384387176
remember when nintenbros would threaten people that dared to give botw a mediocre review?
>>384387550
Well ,they did threaten people at gamespot for Twilight Princess' 8.8
>>384387550
yeah,all of the consolefags do that.
>>384387550
Yes. And I remember people demanding mediocre reviews of Uncharted 4 not count towards the aggregate score. Just ignore all fan boys.
>hes 28 years old
>hes single
>hes childless
>he has undying loyalty to the company that entertained him as a child
>he booked the week off work at the call centre to stay home and play childrens game
>he wants to be a squid kid
>he is a squid man
I figured it would be between 80 and 85, so I have no issues.
>there are people who aren't idorts who don't enjoy gaming as a medium
must suck being poor, having to defend your company and shit on others just because it's all you can afford
if you do own multiple consoles and still engage in console wars you're a manchild
>>384385712
strange, could have sworn a few months ago you were all talking about how reviews don't matter and are all payed for...
So if 85 isn't a good game, what is good? 1 more point, 4 more?
>>384387801
>Having a child before 30s
Unless you're a richfag or actually own a good home and have a pretty good stable job, it's stupid to have a child.
>>384387176
Yeah because that score is actually a 74. You have to subtract 10 points for the Nintendo bonus.