75-85 is the true kino range, prove me wrong

>millionaire bonus off by 1

W E W

>>384374494

fallout 4 was also rated 84. Pretty sure bethes just paid the reviewers so they could skimp on royalties

File: IMG_20170718_175747.jpg (142KB, 1080x876px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1080x876px

This is true

>>384374494
Splatoon is not a true 84 tho. You need to keep in mind the existence of the Nintendo bonus and subtract accordingly.

>>384374494
only 2003 - 2010 games

File: ScreenShot138.jpg (151KB, 1134x601px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 1134x601px

>>384374494
You might be on to something

File: 1276698127693.jpg (77KB, 360x290px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 360x290px

>People are still buttblasted at Bethesda because they didn't pay Obsidian for the bonus they didn't earn
>To the point of accusing them of paying reviewers to give New Vegas worse scores so they wouldn't have to pay the bonus.

Never gets old.

>>384375003
Fallout has an obsidian bonus too

>>384374494
I'm a fan of the 85-89 range myself

>>384377142
Obsidian has +European scores -American scores so it evens out.

>>384374494
launch new vegas was horrible so nope

File: 1475695548673.png (44KB, 413x219px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 413x219px

hes right you know

>>384377269
This. The fucking thing ran like ass, too, which boggles my mind since it's practically a FO3 mod, yet my modded FO3 ran at silky smooth 60fps when NV launched, and vanilla NV barely hit 35 fps, with lots of stutter.

File: 61e918ad4b2b8f83e2c0dd1c5f1f0c21--costume-live.jpg (34KB, 480x443px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 480x443px

>>384374494
Wrong, faggot.

http://www.gamerankings.com/wii-u/633263-pikmin-3/index.html

>>384376478
link one (1) post in this thread that has done that

>>384377849
See: >>384374813

File: Capture.png (62KB, 683x369px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 683x369px

>>384374494
you're right

>>384377849
not him but see >>384374813

File: Screenshot_20170718-193156.jpg (231KB, 1440x632px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 1440x632px

>>384377694
Yet also kind right... And wrong.

File: mb.jpg (211KB, 1331x659px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 1331x659px

I think you're onto something OP

>>384377450
?
FO3 was also complete trash at launch (welcome to CTD-Hell-tier). Not a very good point.

>>384379445
But it ran much smoother than NV. The point isn't that FO3 was good at launch, but that for 2 games that were using the same engine and more or less the same assets with very little graphical difference, NV ran like dogshit by comparison.