Graphics thread?

File: witcher3ultra.jpg (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1440px

>>384337474
lol at your console graphics

>>384337725
is that the ps2 version

Can we just have a grafix thread where the PS4 players post their shit and the PC players post their shit and there's none of this cyclical shitposting
fucking autists jesus christ

>>384337474
whoa. nice movie but this is a game board.

File: 0543 - zXno1OF.jpg (34KB, 648x628px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 648x628px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7X0jq00hNk

>>384337725
this looks awful

https://youtu.be/aVPXKdSEGNQ
https://youtu.be/qEGWtyJAkO0
Whoa! Just look how amazing horizon looks compared to that toddler game.

File: cb8e205724a7c4070df3d94a9dcd6deb.png (32KB, 462x281px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 462x281px

>>384338247
>Being this mad

File: 1476946286604.png (461KB, 512x530px) Image search: [Google]

461KB, 512x530px

>>384338247

>>384337474
That area has a really bad draw distance, whoever took this shot aimed the camera to try & hide it

>>384337474
>those graphics
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

*breathes in*

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

File: ZfszEz.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

Me: Gimme dat destruction of peecee graph-
Barber: Say no more pham.

>>384337725
>that rock texture

File: 1499675793367.jpg (527KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

527KB, 1920x1080px

>>384337474

>>384338764
>how many lens flares do you want?
>all of them

All the bait posts.
>>384337725
It's not even ultra at all.

Just fucking start banning this shit you fucking mods. Every fucking day the same crap and you shitters don't realize it.

Will a Sony exclusive ever not trigger /v/?

File: TW3ultra.webm (3MB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 960x540px

>>384338938
Wrong kid

>>384339121
>rock textures are shit
>plants looks weird
>trees are moving as if its storming yet his hair barely moves
shiiiiiiiit

File: 20170419124422_1.jpg (1001KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1001KB, 3840x2160px

>>384337725
>>384339121
Why do the equipment's textures look so blurry?

>>384339121
You obviously fucked with the settings or you have no idea about videogames. Because the cloth seam already tells me volumes of the setting you are using.

I've seen your shitty shitpost in every horizon le best looking game ever thread yet. You false flagging piece of shit.

Grafix pics should be banned, we should only have grafix webms. Games are meant to be seen in motion. I know that Witcher 3 looks damn gorgeous with all the animation going on and that it loses a lot from being reduced to stills, but I've never seen Horizon with shit actually going on in it.

File: 20170103174429_1.jpg (375KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 1920x1080px

>>384339121
>falseflagging that hard

>>384339203
The wind is really stupid in this game. Trees literally get their trunks bent from the wind while characters act and look like there's a slight breeze.

>>384339248
Because it's a console game

File: 20170630214039_1.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>384339285
>but I've never seen Horizon with shit actually going on in it.
And you won't since you'll see how foliage and water don't react to things moving through them.

>>384339458
And somehow the textures look fine for everyone else despite that reasoning? I don't get it.

>>384339250
Your delusion is quite sad. The game is a watered down, downgraded console port. Inconsistencies in graphics are a given.

File: X-plane 11.webm (2MB, 1920x810px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x810px

>>384339285
k

File: w3.jpg (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

This is a PC screenshot i took of The Witcher 3

I don't know what version of TW3 half of the people in this thread are playing but it sure as fuck ain't PC.

File: 20170107003330_1.jpg (453KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

453KB, 1920x1080px

>>384339595
You are a shitposter, nothing else now fuck off. The game doesn't look half as bad as you make it out to be by lying.

>>384339546
>And somehow the textures look fine for everyone else despite that reasoning? I don't get it.
I don't see you or anyone posting any screens of that area with that armor. Until you do, this statement is retarded.

>>384339612

None of the cars in your picture are moving except the closest underneath the plane. Not impressive at all. Just an illusion.

File: 1496850286345.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>384339618
He is shitposting and falseflagging. He does it in every graphic thread.

File: 43110_20170613160430_1.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

this is a 2010 game

File: witcher3ultra4k.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>384339704
>>384339796
You are a witcher drone, an extremely pathetic one. This is 100% unaltered, unmodded ultra settings.

File: 20170328033912_1.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>384339756
Nah, I'll just settle for the game looking better for me than it does for that anon.

File: 20170112063624_1.jpg (198KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 1920x1080px

>>384339918
sure

>>384339937
Except it doesn't, you're just a retard in denial. If you go to that area, wear that armor and have the same weather and time of day, your game will look exactly the same.

File: Pic_20170501_034125_3840x2160rs.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

Is this the bullshot thread

File: TheForestWALL.jpg (212KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1920x1080px

Can it be a /comfy/ thread too?

File: 20170331200652_1.jpg (995KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

995KB, 3840x2160px

>>384339918
This one I can believe to be ultra settings since the rocks really do look like shit even on ultra and you can see more detail on the equipment. But >>384337725 looked blurry as fuck for some reason, like there's some filter on the whole image that blurs it up.

>>384340034
That's quite a length to go to just to prove the game looks bad in one particular instance with specific equipment anon. I want my games to look better, not worse.

>>384339612
Most games change lod when you zoom in. This means nothing.

When will horizonfags realize that nobody cares about their game? Are they just shitposting at this point?

File: 20170717025407_1.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>384340154
Neat game but not something I would have paid for myself in its current state. I like building comfy log cabins though.

>>384340351
>Are they just shitposting at this point?

When are sony ponies not shitposting?

File: teafgasfsd.jpg (4MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3840x2160px

>>384337725
fix yo game dude

>>384340216
Only difference is 4k. The game's shitty postprocessing AA is more noticeable at lower resolutions.

>That's quite a length to go to just to prove the game looks bad in one particular instance with specific equipment anon. I want my games to look better, not worse.
If you don't want the truth then don't do it. But don't argue something you don't know and can't prove.

>>384340351

clearly a lot of people care if it gets posted all the time

File: wotcher.jpg (35KB, 357x375px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 357x375px

>>384340518

>>384340438
To their credit, they tend to be the console user punching bag even though Xbox has no exclusives, a smaller userbase, and Nintendo is well, Nintendo. A lot of the shitposting (not all of it, just most of it) is provoked response

>gigantic graphical powerhouse game can look bad in some specific spots
gee this applies to literally every single graphically ambitious video game ever made

File: hm.png (3MB, 1279x1428px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1279x1428px

>>384338158
NOOO THIS CANT BE HAPPENING !!! MY PS4 IS SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEST GRAPHICS!!!

File: 20170419125325_1.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>384340553
Argue what? My initial question was
>why do the equipment's textures look so blurry?
to which the response was
>it's a console game
How does that explain anything?

And then, it turns out that it's blurry due to shitty postprocess AA instead of just blurry textures in general which has nothing to do with it being a console game since you can still get great looking visuals with the appropriate settings. The only truth here is that I've been playing W3 for 130 hours with sharp as fuck textures thanks to my setup and settings but somehow I'm the retard because I wanted my game to look better and not worse. The strangest things happen on /v/.

>>384340586
Man I wish modding Gta 5 wasn't such a fucking hassle, I'd destroy that game with high res car models and textures

File: Absolutely disgusting.jpg (8KB, 192x256px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 192x256px

>>384338158
>1:15
>That frame-rate drop

>>384338247
BROS, WTF?! THIS CANT BE REAL!!!!

>>384340887
>>384337474
What games are these?

File: smhujd6l2e8z.png (2MB, 1357x733px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1357x733px

>>384341104
X plane 11

File: 34890081353_a437c19274_o.jpg (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

*Looks like reality*

>>384340925
Your argument is that your game looks better than that screen, which you will find is wrong if you replicate the same conditions with ultra settings. This is why you're a fucking retard, and a sad drone. The game looks like shit in that area because consoles couldn't handle any better. That should've been enough to explain what you asked, if you weren't a complete moron.

>>384340967

You realize that game has a static environment and fake skybox, right? Can you fly through the clouds? Good looking but not impressive.

>>384341148
thanks

Horizon zero dawn is still the most beautiful game I have ever and will ever play. I just wish I never wasted thousands of dollars on my pc gaming rig just to play undertale on the highest settings.

File: ASDFSADFASD.jpg (4MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3840x2160px

>>384340625
DELETE

>>384341164

Please see
>>384341236

>graphics thread
>people post jpgs
And people wonder why do console games focus on resolution and shiny screenshots over anything else.

>>384341249

Horizon Zero Dawn uses a shit ton of postprocess effects to mask the ugly visuals and lighting. Look at all the lens flare, fog and bloom.

File: 20170717205509_1.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

>>384340409

I got a GTX 1070 recently, what's some good eyecandy I can try out?

File: fsda.jpg (650KB, 2880x1620px) Image search: [Google]

650KB, 2880x1620px

THREAD ENDED

File: 20170409092748_1.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>384341231
Yeah, the game does look better in my experience from playing the game than it did in that screen. What I don't get is why I would want to go to the trouble of replicating those conditions just to prove whether or not it would look better, worse or just as bad for me. Why would I want to have my game look worse? Why are you playing it on PC and yet don't take advantage of mods and settings that can allow you to have a better looking game? How is deliberately having a worse looking game not the retarded thing to do?

File: Gran-Turismo-Sport-Bild-2.jpg (244KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 1920x1080px

>>384341164
>posting gran shitizmo in a graphics thread

>>384341325
>console games focus on resolution
>because they upscale to 4k
Good joke

I think autism should be punishable by death.

We should be ensuring our children do not suffer from this illness, rather than coddling the people who have it.

File: Screen_141024_003324_zpsb6a040d6.jpg (56KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 1024x576px

>>384341236
>static environment
What does this mean, there are ambient civilian vehicles, season cycles, and fully destructible buildings
>fake skybox
You mean the edge of the fucking atmosphere?
>Can you fly through the clouds?
Yes

>>384341497
If you're going to make the argument that your game looks better, make sure you have proof to back it up. Post a screen of the same area. If not then you're just a drone blindly defending another console downgrade with inconsistent graphics.

File: 1496904873-gran-turismo-tm-sport-version-de-test-beta-fermee-20170608083749.png (2MB, 1879x765px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1879x765px

>>384341521

>>384341624

Show me a picture of you flying inside of a cloud.

>>384341249
Have a (You), fagot, for the effort.

File: 20170402235725_1.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>384341682
I've been posting screens of what I experienced from the game and they definitely do look better. But again, why would I want to replicate one particular instance of where the game would look bad using equipment I wouldn't want to use? Not even trying to defend the game and I'm not sure why you would think that. I was legitimately wondering why it looked worse in that screen than it did for me. Now, I'm also legitimately wondering why I would want to purposely make the game look worse for myself because some anon would call me a drone if I didn't.

>>384340135
game?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZqH11eKp44

>>384341809
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJSKNo3T2J8
10:50, what were you expecting?

>>384342041
>hmmmm why should I bother proving the argument that I'm blindly making
In reality your game will look just like that screen, and the fact that you blindly defended the game without knowing the truth is what makes you a drone.

File: 22ac4d34e25067d48ff33fff86bc0ccf.jpg (480KB, 1279x718px) Image search: [Google]

480KB, 1279x718px

>>384341807
nice non-gameplay screenshot

File: 1488329846714.gif (31KB, 150x200px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 150x200px

>>384341249
Even if you spent 2000 dollars on a pc only to play undertale, it would literally be a better value proposition than dropping 400 for horizon.

File: 20170419095422_1.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>384342308
>blindly defending the game
Again, why do you get the impression that I'm doing this? We've already established that I wouldn't get the same blurry image that is in >>384337725 since the post process AA is less shitty at higher resolutions. I would instead get something like >>384339918 instead. And since I can agree with that already, why should I go to the lengths to prove a point I'm not trying to make? I've already gotten my answer as to why the first image was so blurry. So why would I want my game to look worse now? And how am I defending the game without knowing some truth that you've already proven?

>>384342307

The plane isn't flying through the clouds in that video. The clouds are underneath or above the plane.

I'm talking about this, skip to 1:50 and start watching

https://youtu.be/Oevha30liVU?t=117

>>384342612
DCS is free, how about you download it real quick, make a mission with overcast settings, fly through it, then report back

>>384338158
GT looks much better. Those cars looks beautiful, the sounds is better and more realistic and the driving looks good.

File: clouds.png (1MB, 1916x1079px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1916x1079px

>>384342612
Looks to be flying in the clouds here.

>>384339350
you're just a delusional buttmader

File: 1499671552-gran-turismo-tm-sport-version-de-test-beta-fermee-20170709205634.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>384342510
Thanks for posting the same alpha screenshot twice

>>384339850
Russians make the best games

>>384343049
saying man who saving every shitty screenshot from the game he didn't like, sage

File: resident-evil-7-biohazard-graphics-wallpaper-7036.jpg (303KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 3840x2160px

Get mad

>>384343178
>saging a vidya thread
Further butthurt confirmed

>>384337474
I'm playing Horizon right now. It's a pretty game, but it also feels a bit like a mess. Like nothing on it stands out properly and everything just meshes together incomprehensibly.

File: horizonzerodawn_20170njjze.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>384343528
like what

File: 1311763499070.jpg (16KB, 300x354px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 300x354px

>>384343329
>chromatic aberration

>>384343576
This image is a nice example. It's very monochromatic, the trees add a huge amount of visual noise and the structure in the background doesn't stand out at all.

>>384343551
>lens flare remains when clouds hide the sun
How hard is it to code proper lens flares? GTAV does this shit too.

>>384341249
I thought Rise of the Tomb Raider looked quite a bit better, even if you're talking about the PS4 Pro version.

File: ERZL0z.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>384343709
That just doesn't make any sense.
You expect every picture to be a lesson in photography? Why would it stand out. It is just a screenshot my dood.

>>384338247
I love how you have to point out small graphical effects while ignoring that 99,9% of horizons graphical details shit all over zelda to the point zelda looks two console and a half console generations behind. Lol

>>384343960
Zelda does have way more physics going on, HZD's grass has no zero interaction outside of small parts of tall grass here & there

>>384343868
Hm. I've explored that very area yesterday and it didn't look anywhere as good. Either it's a bullshot or I need to configure my television better.

Either way, I think the game looks pretty damn good. It's just that this overall feeling of sameness has been reducing my enjoyment of the experience overall.

>>384337474
Most non interactive open world I've played in a while, the world felt static and nothing meshes with the player characters actions

>>384344041
delete this

File: Untitled-5.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>384343762
go outside and look at the sun

File: eLjZ447.jpg (371KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

371KB, 1920x1080px

>>384344023
Well i can only assume you haven't played for that long or made it that far into the game. But you may be fatigued on the graphics if you have already witnessed it online a lot.

>>384343178
absolutely buttmad

>>384343960
I'm more perplexed that HZD can have so much detail put into its assets, post process effects, lighting, etc. but miss out on shit like physical interaction with foliage that has been a thing for the past decade on consoles and more so on PC. Makes for great screenshots but it irks me a lot while playing. They're so close that it's weird that they didn't go the small step they would have needed to make the world feel more alive.

>>384344041
Except when you blow up trees etc.

>>384344004
Yeah and 99,9% everything else looks better whats your point?

File: large.jpg (25KB, 648x365px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 648x365px

>>384342742
Thank you anon kun, we won't folget your roarty

>>384344265
>etc
Like what?

The player clips through foliage, can't climb small ledges, can't climb trees, can't climb on a number of rocks, and you're only "hidden" when you're standing in certain grass because of the way the AI work's. It's a pretty looking game at times but it's all superficial when it's just AssCred in a pretty skin

>>384344173
There's something wrong with your eyes if you see lens flares when looking at the sun

>>384344464
Regular clouds (not thick rain clouds) obscure the sun but don't hide it entirely. You can still see its glow through the clouds.
The way it looks in Arma 3 is dumb as fuck though, it's just reduced to some teletubby baby sun sprite instead of actually spreading its light softly along the clouds.

If it's meant to sacrifice fps and longer load time, devs should give up polishing graphics.

>>384344443
You are harder to be spotted by robots if you are out of LOS of an enemy and/or if you are crouching (also works outside of tall grass) You can jump onto anything even if you can't actively grip onto it and climb it.
The player may clip through most foliage but that is just a visual thing that isn't all that important.
In combat robots and explosions can take out big pieces of cover that would be static objects in most games.

>>384344602
>The way it looks in Arma 3 is dumb as fuck though, it's just reduced to some teletubby baby sun sprite instead of actually spreading its light softly along the clouds.
I think that's the point the anon was trying to make. The lens flare looks like shit because it's too noticeably just a sprite and a low res one at that.

>>384344751
They did it poorly, but it would look worse if the sun winked out of existence whenever a wispy cirrus moved in front of it.

>>384344625
Devs should learn to prioritize aspects of grafix that actually matter (textures, lighting, good animation) before adding unnecessary fluff.

>>384344923
The sun itself shouldn't, but the lens flare should

>>384344923
Winking out of existence would look worse, true, but surely they could have it shrink down instead.

File: 1479812019485.jpg (225KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 800x533px

>>384345383
>even stealing Zelda's memes
Christ

nice shitposting about grafix, so
when wast the last time you had sex?

>autistic Horizon fags ruin yet another thread
Why does this keep happening

>>384345383
>Stealing memes

Sad life for sad sony fanboys.

>>384345987
>>384346404
Zelda stole it too you dumb newfags

>>384346336
he just posted a fucking screenshot
blame the m-muh pc shiters who get triggered everytime when someone is posting decent looking console game

>>384346445
That's not how it works.

>>384346517
IT'S OK WHEN NINTENDO DOES IT

>>384346260
BDO?

>>384346260
>>384346718
>>384346726
Oh, ass creed was my second guess

File: 20170508221849_1.jpg (1MB, 3440x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3440x1440px

>>384346782

>>384346832
Pretty great looking game, almost makes wanna play the abomination

>>384347107
Looks good except the ice, I don't think these devs ever seen ice

>>384347107
that looks really bad, no AA pass, flat colorless lighting, dead background, looks like star wars prequel cg.

>>384346832
Why does this game look amazing and the new one like absolute dogshit?

File: batman07.jpg (904KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

904KB, 1920x1080px

still my favorite.

>>384347398
>flat colorless lighting, dead background
It's overcast. Realistic.

>>384347398
The lightning is actually pretty good

>>384337474
i guess that's the only thread this game would appear in, nothing except graphics for pretty screenshots

>>384344348
wtf hes a muslim?
no wonder the jew fear the samurai.

>>384348232
It's the best place to discuss it because Nintendo fags don't have graphics so they stay away from these threads, when they're not salty and butthurt enough to come here and whine about it.

>>384344232
It was probably deliberate. Tall grass interacts when the player moves through it so it's obvious that they can add the effect, but
1. Camera is zoomed in so far that you'd seldom notice
2. Foliage that bends when the player walks through it often looks distorted and weird.
BotWs grass bending exists but only works because the grass is so simple. You notice when you walk through bushes that the model deforms and the texture stretches. In Horizon, where you can see individual leaves, that would mean leaves expanding and branches deforming. It also often looks like Link has a bubble around him which pushes grass away.

>>384346445

At this point that image is Botw banter fodder. HZD using it after It got popular with The smug zelda face is just too petty to not laugh at it.

>>384348874
kek, this looks really corny

File: 1f220034843ea611209156864c907093.png (787KB, 1279x710px) Image search: [Google]

787KB, 1279x710px

>>384343119

>>384348590
Of course it was deliberate. BotW's decisions in that regard made for a more interesting game/visuals is all. IMHO.

HZD still looks very impressive and thats the point of the thread so there's that.

>>384337474
God damn I wish this was on PC.

I mean, I own a PS4, but like hell am I ever going to play a game with shooting elements on a controller again.
It feels so awful I just lose all fucking motivation to play anymore.

>>384349505
Having simplistic graphics are better in such regards. I wish more games did it. The boulders that look like they're made out of plastic, the complete lack of shadows in the grass and the awful animations don't work with more detailed models and textures.

>>384339771
'paused'

I don't understand why people even consider making an argument that console graphics somehow surpass PC graphics when it's a known fact that multiplats consistently have to downgrade because consoles simply do not have the hardware to run stuff that wouldn't give trouble to PC

>>384349829
Yeah, I wish they actually made proper M&KB control options for consoles, the dumb emulated analog stick way the console mouses work right now is just ass backwards

File: 1490826508569.jpg (239KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 1920x1080px

>graphics thread
>posts ps4 games on screenshot mode
FUCK YOU
FUCK THESE PS4 SHILLS
STOP LYING TO YOURSELVES
CONSOLES GAMES DO NOT BELONG IN GRAPHICS THREADS
this is how horizon actually looks without screenshot mode and not on cutscenes
go show your movies on /tv/

>>384352629
Cherrypicking. Game looks great. Cry about it.

>>384352696
Game looks only good when everything is obscured with fog, bright glow and bloom.

>>384352696
>Cherrypicking
not an arguments
pc games look great on all kinds of environments
when will ps4 stop losing to PC? NEVER
g-go on screenshot mode right now and prove me wrong!!!

File: original.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>384352629
only
possible
on
PS4

File: 1500208683595.jpg (707KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

707KB, 1920x1080px

>>384352574
>tfw the best looking game because no pc port to hold back the graphics

>>384353158
looks like a 2010 PC MMO

>>384352743
>obscured with fog, bright glow and bloom.
right after
>>384353158

like pottery

>>384353562
every game on pc and ps4 looks better and performs 10 times better on PC
nice try though
show us a shared platform game and how it looks on ps4
ill show u PC
u cant? what a shame

File: 1500209403422.jpg (249KB, 1536x864px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1536x864px

>>384353680
>pc exclusive in 2017

>>384353758
>Made by 1 person
bravo

File: Rjt0nzk.jpg (524KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

524KB, 1920x1080px

>>384353746
Nah multi-plats look literally the same.
Remember. No pc port = no downgrade

tell me an advantage to ps4 other than "exclusive"
ill wait

>>384353880
remember
pc port = game actually doesnt get held back by 8 year old hardware

>>384353880
No console port = no downgrade you mean

File: 1500209217021.jpg (246KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 1920x1080px

>>384353993
>>384353993
sure

>>384354058
>posts an ugly picture

>>384353993
>>384354004
these
>>384353880
not this

>>384337474
Why is this game so flat

>>384353791
>excuses

>>384337474
Thought it was Vivi in the thumbnail

File: EE2QnCY.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>384353680
HZD reminds me of BDO visually

File: 1499957275934.jpg (36KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 657x527px

>>384354779
d-delet

>>384337474
The shilling of horizon needs to stop.

File: Mirror's Edge Catalyst 07.16.2017 - 15.36.11.17.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>384354058

>>384344464
>tfw slight cataract in one eye, so when I look at light sources I actually do see a lens flare and bloom

File: Mirror's Edge Catalyst 07.16.2017 - 16.01.36.27.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>384355016

>>384348874
DEJA VU

File: 346110_20170618234004_1.jpg (1MB, 2560x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1080px

>>384337474
I like ARK's visuals.

>>384355450
>those textures where grass stops rendering
So close to looking good

>>384355450
looks like trash

File: 292030_screenshots_20170713002001_1.jpg (975KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

975KB, 3840x2160px

>>384337725
My Witcher 3 maxed at 4k

>>384355752
You dont like game i get it, but stop being faggot.

File: 292030_screenshots_20170709210321_1.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>384337725
Also

>>384338247
Wild NintoddIer appeared!

>>384355882
Looks terrible. What's with the straight lines in the distance?

>>384356056
SEETHING

File: Average Nintendo Fan.jpg (124KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1024x1024px

>>384356056

>>384356419
New meme? What does it mean?

>>384356582
Does it like dicks?

>>384356672
SEETHING

File: Average Nintendo Fan Vol.2.png (808KB, 520x793px) Image search: [Google]

808KB, 520x793px

>>384356856
Most likely.

>>384356952
>bing! bing! 1 up!
>WAHOOO