You're missing a huge business opportunity here, From Software.

>>384156168
If it's the Essential Collection then why is DaS2 on it?

>>384156168
Can the switch move these games? (Sorry for my bad English)

>>384156408
Yes. "The Switch is weak" is just a meme.

>>384156408

Your English is fine and the answer is no.

Nintendo has proven time and time again that they cant move third party titles

I'm hoping that then Switch at least gets some good love from From.

>>384156963
Maybe it can run King’s Field

>>384156515
The switch is a modern mobile PS3 power wise. It wouldnt be able to andle DS3 without make compromises.
And Nintenbros don't buy good games. They only care about Mario and Zelda.

>>384156286
underrated

>>384157180
Mario and Zelda are some of the best franchises the industry has to offer so I see no problem here.

File: From Software.jpg (242KB, 1440x787px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1440x787px

>>384156286
I dunno know anon

File: 500x500.png (172KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 500x500px

>>384157180
Ha ha, you meant to say, they don't buy good games except Skyrim™ for the Nintendo Switch right?

>>384157359
wahoooooooooo

>>384156168
always begging for games

>>384156515
lets hear some specs then, bebe genius

>>384156286
FPBP

File: 1480005778326.jpg (421KB, 3500x2322px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 3500x2322px

>Dark Souls essential collection is announced
>For every console
>except the Switch

>>384156286
For the same reason why Devil May Cry 2 is in the PS360 HD DMC compilation. You can't just pretend it doesn't exist.

>>384156286
lol thread?

>>384156286
Haha, the good 'ol "Dark Souls 2 is bad" meme! Classic!

>>384156286
Savage

It's doubtful the hardware could handle it, at least not without significant reworking and optimization.

>>384157180
>The switch is a modern mobile PS3 power wise.
It blows out the PS3 when undocked.

>>384156168
>A Dark Souls trilogy release for the Switch would easily outsell all the other platform's sales combined.
Is this level of delusion normal for Nintendofags?

they would need something like 1 million sales to make money on it
what is the last triple A game that sold more than 500k on a nintendo console?

File: 53f.jpg (27KB, 600x765px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 600x765px

>>384157393
For me its BB=Ds1 > DeS > Ds2 >Ds3

I have to say that 2... well is not a bad game but puff in comparation with 1, shit, another stuff, absurd situations like the bridge with a lot of retards and finish it with a easy as fuck boss.. bosses in general are really easy, only put more people, more and more, without sense, bah, i will finish it but.... if 1 was 10, this is 6...

>>384157180
>This maymay again

Fromsoft here
We had planned on porting it, however, Sony paid us not too

>>384156168
>A Dark Souls trilogy release for the Switch would easily outsell all the other platform's sales combined.
are you living in fantasyland?

>>384156168
why can't the actual releases have cover art this nice?

>>384156168
kek
this is probably the delusional fag who was salty MHW wasn't on switch

>>384160659

Bayonetta? Or is that AA?

File: AB6B8BB6-CF83-4637-9850-F85CC1F2034C-214-0000000F9ACC488F.png (568KB, 726x837px) Image search: [Google]

568KB, 726x837px

>>384157180
Why do sonybros feel the need to shill their consoles in every thread?

>DS trilogy gets released on the Switch
>it runs at 20fps@480p with with sub PS3 visuals

File: 1500022791254.jpg (62KB, 524x336px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 524x336px

>>384156168
>Essential Collection
>missing the 2 best games in the series

>>384162265
Maybe because this thread is about Sony exclusives?

>>384157597
Oh my god, consumers want video games for their video game consoles? How fucking dare they. Next the peasants will demand food to put in their refrigerators, or gasoline for their cars.

It'll happen when Sony gets a Mario game.
>read: never
Keep your mayreeohs.

>>384162869
Demon's Souls and Bloodborne are not part of the Dark Souls series.

>>384156168
>From having any bearing over the port status of Souls games instead of Namco.
>Wanting anyone but From to handle the port, knowing full well that From will probably never work for Namco again.
>Expecting the Switch to run Dark Souls 3.
>Painstakingly porting 3 different games to mobile hardware for 60$ retail.

>>384156168
Is there a conspiracy against Nintendo or something, the Switch has sold units, why no third party support? Is Nintendo charging some ridiculous fee or something to develop a Switch game maybe? Like the Wii U didn't sell much but Switch did, I just don't understand.

>>384163360
...

>>384163376
>I just don't understand
It's slightly more powerful than your average phone.

>>384163374
>Wanting anyone but From to handle the port
Why you would NOT want that? From is hardly competent at porting games.

>>384163376
It's less powerful than current gen hardware, making it difficult to get games running on it that already struggle to hit 30fps. Patch support is a nightmare, which likely means that support in general is rough, and the system doesn't have as many units sold as PS4/Xbox/PC.

So, to put it in the business perspective, why should they?

>>384163868
Only the first port of DaS1 was fucked up. All the others were fine.

>tfw Demon's Souls on PC will never happen
>NieR on PC will never happen
Just kill me already.

>>384163374
>Expecting the Switch to run Dark Souls 3.
It can.

>>384156168
Nintendo fans wouldn't like the souls games. I know the difficulty shit has been memed to hell and back, but this is a company that put in a "can't lose" mode in maria kart and an invincible mode in starfox.

>>384164268
't

>>384157393
Switch DaS and BB and this is spot on.

>>384156168
Imagine Bloodborne on the Switch...

Fuck Sony

>>384163376
People didn't buy the Switch for 3rd party games. I don't think anyone sat on their hands waiting for the next Nintendo console to come out so that they could start playing all the games that came out in the interim. If you wanted to play Dark Souls, you pulled the trigger on buying another console or better PC long ago.

From Software is supporting it, though. We just have no idea in what way yet.

>>384164262
>NieR on PC will never happen
Does Sony own this? I get Demon's, but I know nothing about Nier.

>>384156963

They were one of the first companies confirmed to be supporting it.

File: NX_Partners.jpg (833KB, 2097x1388px) Image search: [Google]

833KB, 2097x1388px

>>384163376
It is getting third-party support. Games are being announced fairly regularly, and From Software's among the third-parties said to be working on the Switch. These things aren't all going to be ready to announce right off the bat.

For companies that haven't started anything for the Switch, a few months of successful sales is not enough time to put together a project and ready it to announce. If any publishers are going to make moves in reaction to the sales of the console, it's going to take a while for it to manifest.

File: 757C69B6-AA48-478F-9D40-8E50A5061967-214-00000036BE689A16.png (572KB, 600x580px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 600x580px

>>384163003
>Sony exclusives

File: dimple.jpg (113KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1280x720px

When are we getting a DeS remaster

>>384164616
They sent Nintendo a care that says Well Done!

>>384156168
It's gonna be announced at TGS you dingus. There's even a specific report that says they're considering releasing exactly what you're talking about.

>>384164734
They were at the time.

Remember when GTAIV was X360 exclusive?

>>384163475
He's right

silky smooth 20 fps

>>384164692
>Vast majority of major third party releases announced at E3 weren't for Switch
>Still believes that picture.

>>384164659
No nier was on the 360 as well

If you could pick one of the following, which would you choose?
>remaster of Dark Souls with a fixed second half and all the ideas they wanted to implement put in the game
>remaster of Demon's Souls with the 6th Archstone and fixes to all game mechanics that have since been refined

Demon's Souls would still be Sony exclusive

>>384165252
Why is a PC port out of the question then?

>>384164365

not run it.

>>384156168
Everyone who wants to play these games already has. This would be a huge, expensive undertaking for a market that doesn't exist.

>>384165128
Nearly all of the publishers listed there have already announced games for the Switch.

>>384164917

4 was never exclusive. The DLC were.

>>384157180
>dark souls
>good games

File: 9D2F482D-5090-4AE4-9CF9-85F86783E484-1339-00000122D8AC85C1.jpg (26KB, 300x240px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 300x240px

>>384164917
>they were at a time

>>384164917
Demon souls maybe but Dark Souls has always been multiplat.

>>384163871
>Patch support is a nightmare
Only for certain tasks. I think it was said they had problem with patches that optimize games to reduce file sizes.

>>384165561
And most of them are shovelware or overpriced ports (See: Street Fighter 2)

I'm a soulsfag and the novelty of these being portable isn't worth the lack of online features.

>>384156168
You are delusional or baiting to think that it would outsell all the other platforms combined, the switch hasn't even had a full year of sales yet, DS and DSII had the huge player base of the PS3 and 360 you retard.

>>384165260
>>remaster of Dark Souls with a fixed second half and all the ideas they wanted to implement put in the game
This one.

I love dark souls and would replay it again for a revised second half.

>>384165128
>Vast majority of major third party releases announced at E3 weren't for Switch
A vast majority of those games have also been in development for 4 years.

>>384163376
>the Switch has sold units
For every switch out there there is between 6-20+ of their competitors, and their competitors are all on the same standards and of a more powerful hardware level, plus provide better development and marketing support to third parties.

This is not hard to understand.

>>384156168
>we want more ports
jesus christ, no wonder the thing has a dock when all nintendo fans can think about is mooring boats

>>384166170
And games like Battlefield 4, AC: Black Flag, CoD weren't when they were launch titles of Xbox One and PS4? Do you honestly believe that they made these games within a few months?

AAA Third Party games are dead on arrival for the Switch

>>384166292

>Switch is the second fastest selling console to day with the backing of the biggest engine developer and GPU developer.

Pretty difficult sempai.

>>384157393
Are you me?

Wait. Are people unironically saying the switch is powerful? Do they not know what chip exists inside it? Do they know how hardware works?

>>384156168
I don't want this trash on my Switch. From is a one trick pony anyway. If you want more trash on your Switch why don't you ask EA to release Ass Creed on Switch.

>>384166523

Battlefield didn't even work at launch. It took them almost a year to start fixing shit.

>>384166835

You mean the most powerful mobile chip on the market?

>>384166710
and that doesn't invalidate a thing I said in that post.

>>384166951
And it never saw the Wii U, nor will any Battlefield or Battlefront game see the Switch.

>>384167141

Wii U was a flop from the beginning.

>>384166954
Even in docked mode, it's downclocked as to not kill the console itself. And saying mobile and powerful is an oxymoron.

>>384166710
>with the backing of the biggest engine developer and GPU developer.
You mean the same engine developer whose primary platforms are the switch's competition, who also have hardware partnerships with a gpu developer?

>>384156168
>essential collection
>it just has all of them
the word essential really isn't needed. just say trilogy or just collection

>>384166954
>You mean the most powerful mobile chip on the market?
It wasn't even the best nvidia mobile chip when the system launched.

>go to any game trailer on Youtube
>one of the top comments is always "Please bring to Switch"
what a sad existence

>>384167141

We're not talking about the Wii U and no Battlefield game has released or been talked about since the Switch has released.

EA's internal teams not named DICE are having trouble with the current version of Frostbyte. Even if they wanted Frostbyte games on the Switch, they have hit walls in trying to do so.

>>384156168
>assumes everyone is into the souls meme as much as wannabe pc console tards
gross. Get that shit away from me.

>>384167241
So why isn't there a Switch version of Battlefield 1 or Battlefront?

Again, they aren't getting major AAA third party games. Old ports that ran on PS3/360? Sure. Skyrim? Okay. Expect anything more than that and you'll be disappointed.

>>384167318
>You mean the same engine developer whose primary platforms are the switch's competition
Epic doesn't have primary platforms. They want people to use their games anywhere and everywhere.

>>384167110

It refutes two of your points, mainly support and market growth.

>>384167646
Mass Effect Andromeda was in release window if you want to go with EA as a major publisher.

Oh, I guess you have the heavily downgraded FIFA game, so there's that. Never mind that they released a FIFA game for the PS2 all the way up to 2014

>>384167781
Epic has way more of a focus on support for some platforms over others and you know it.

This is so pathetic

>>384156168
>most people have already played them all
>buying a switch

Fucking who would play this?

>>384167901
>support

Marketing support to third parties isn't even close to what you are talking about, which was engine compatibility, which its competition also has.

Market growth potential also isn't the same as actual install base.

There are still tens of millions more customers on their competitions platforms. There's nothing today that changes that.

File: 1497598780034.png (2MB, 1512x1049px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1512x1049px

it would probably outsell all of the five games that are out for Switch right now worth having, except the time and effort to port something over to Switch is so expensive it's not even worth it. They're happily cashing in on making BB exclusive to Sony and Souls 1-3 on both PS4 and Xbone. It's not just a "fans really want it!" thing, it's how many hours theyd have to put in and pay their developers just to sell on a weaker platform with a much smaller playerbase.

>>384167742
>So why isn't there a Switch version of Battlefield 1 or Battlefront?
DICE lacked foresight when it came to Frostbyte. Everything you see getting made with engine these days require the devs to do heavy reworks to the engine after it was deemed ready.

>>384167958
>Mass Effect Andromeda was in release window if you want to go with EA as a major publisher.
Mass Effect was thrown out to die.

>Never mind that they released a FIFA game for the PS2 all the way up to 2014
What does that have to do with the Switch and 2017?

File: Screenshot 2017-07-16 at 4.19.26 PM.png (61KB, 637x342px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 637x342px

>>384156168
lol

http://nintendoeverything.com/dark-souls-ii-producer-laughs-when-asked-about-wii-u-version-says-system-is-a-lot-different-from-the-audience-for-dark-souls/

>>384168198
>Marketing support
You knew I was talking about development support, but okay.

>>Market growth potential also isn't the same as actual install base.
No, but its not far away from it. When you're blowing away every projection people do notice.

>There are still tens of millions more customers on their competitions platforms.
And some of those people are looking at the Switch.

>>384167982
I agree. Who would want this trash on their overpriced handheld?

>>384157393
Great taste, but I don't think DS2 is that much worse than 3

>>384168541
Again, having engine compatibility on your system isn't close to what I was talking about, which is actual hands on development support with third parties, which is something microsoft and sony both offer.

>No, but its not far away from it.
Until the install base is present or will be, developers don't care. That's why they don't care now, because they are too busy chasing the main market which is right now not the switch.

I don't for the life of me understand why you people don't get why developers aren't lining up to jump at a comparatively nothing install base right out of the gate. It's blatantly risky business and has a weak payoff vs standard practice.

>>384168918
>I don't for the life of me understand why you people don't get why developers aren't lining up to jump at a comparatively nothing install base right out of the gate. It's blatantly risky business and has a weak payoff vs standard practice.
Because fanboys don't actually know anything about business and misconstrue safe business with some sort of conspiracy, since that's easier to swallow than accepting that their chosen company's hardware isn't the second coming of christ.

>>384156168
>Title in 3 different vertical positions
Why don't fakes have any sense of /gd/

>>384164262
taro said that if automate sold like hotcakes they might be able to convince a publisher to fund the Nier port

File: 1368660265828.jpg (26KB, 493x387px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 493x387px

>switch owners having to whine for games

Come on guys, you're nearly as pathetic as steam fags

DS3 can't run on the switch.

>>384168918
>Until the install base is present or will be, developers don't care.
They do care. Its just that, again, the games are going to come later and not four months after release.

>>384169759
>They do care. Its just that, again, the games are going to come later and not four months after release.
That was kind of a point I made in the very next line of that post.

>>384159162
fuck off fag

File: mXyupD1.gif (1MB, 288x198px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 288x198px

>>384156168

>>384169994

No, you're saying the Switch needs 20m+ before devs do anything. Devs are doing shit now based on the Switch's success but it still takes 3-5 years to develop a game from scratch and about a year to port.

File: 1480011867769.gif (3MB, 286x258px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 286x258px

>>384168470
>Even FromSoft knows Nintendo garbage was made for literal children

>>384170465
>Until the install base is present or will be,
>or will be

Stop.

You're not only putting words in my mouth but you are also trying to avoid reading parts where we basically agree. That's childish, stop. All my posts have been in reaction to one asking why third parties weren't supporting it NOW.

>>384156168
Never, its too weak. and fromsoftware would lose money.

>>384164692
>fromsoft and bethesda: coin flip for quality
>rest garbage
is this really the best you can hope for?

>>384157359
it's all they literally buy. even nintendo gave fans 3rd party games for wii u, but no one bought them. they know this is yhe case for switch, and even worse -- i think even nintendo is hesitant to make games for it

>>384170918
The wii was where they really learned this.

Third party games with actual effort most often got blown out by garbage.

>>384156168
Everyone already owns these on better systems. Jesus you nintenbro numales are dumb as fuck

but... nintendo fans wont buy a pack like this even if it was a super great deal.
they will stick just to Zelda.

>>384170918

The ones that mattered got bought. Everything else got a death sentence.

how did this thread get so many replies?

File: 1500043655530m.jpg (75KB, 725x1024px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 725x1024px

switchfags are the worst. i stumbled upon a PUBG thread and they were just exposed to be the main shitposters who haven't played the game because the game "looks" open world loke BotW so they see it as a threat and want the top "purely gameplay minimal story" game of this year

THEY DO THIS WITH EVERY GAME NOT ON SWITCH. ALL THE SOURCE OF SHITPOSTING CAN BE TRACED BACK TO THEM

>>384158062

>Switch can't run PS3 games may may

You realize the best version of Deus Ex HR is on Wii U and they used the PC specs right? If the Wii U can handle last gen shit just fine why can't the Switch?

>in b4 DaS3

yeah and Persona 5 NEEDED to be on PS4.

>>384156408
At 720p the switch could play das1 and das2 fine.
There's no way it can run das3 without the game having some downgrades

>>384170727
>You're not only putting words in my mouth
>For every switch out there there is between 6-20+ of their competitors

I'm not doing shit but reading what is type. If its bullshit go after the source, not me.

>>384171219
>Better systems
Yeah PS4 is so fun, I love not playing it when I'm not at my house. I don't have to worry about shitty portable 720p graphics, I get to imagine the juicy 4K graphics in my head thank you based Sony.

File: 1499484704940.gif (147KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 480x270px

>>384172045
oh, fuck
>actually being this threatened

>>384160316

>a portable version trilogy pack of one of the most popular franchises of the last generation of consoles won't sell

The Sony delusion is unreal. People would kill to play DaS on the go.

>>384161831

>SONY IS MONEYHATTING FOR EXCLUSIVES MAY MAY XD

Monster Hunter Worlds was in development long before the Switch was a concept. The Wii U tanked and Capcom were not confident in the Switch's install base at that point. Take your tinfoil off.

>>384156286
>what is scholar

>>384163328

>FROM SOFTWARE ONLY WORKS WITH SONY!

Tell that to DaS. You can keep your Bloodborne meme game.

this thread is as pathetic as the
>spiderman homecoming sucks gib ps4 to pc

>>384172003

Switch could 1080p 1 and probably 900p 2.

Wouldn't really get tested until 3.

>>384165945

>worth the lack of online features.

you know Switch has online right?

>>384163035
>Oh my god, consumers want video games for their video game consoles? How fucking dare they
This mindset is fucking retarded. It implies you bought the system because of the brand name alone. And before you try to tell me otherwise, here's basically what you said

>I'm begging people to bring games to the system I own instead of owning the systems with the games I want

>>384172425

>Not confident in putting MH on a portable hybrid.
They are idiots and deserve to die then.

Sony did moneyhat though.

>>384171802
>>384171802
>>384171802
reminder

>>384166357

>we want more PORTABLE ports of previous console exclusives with definitive content and patch fixes from previous versions

fixed for truth.

>>384170918
Bomberman, Puyo Puyo Tetris, and Disgaea have done pretty well on the Switch so far. Customers will notice third-party games if they aren't drowned out by garbage. The Wii U was just a mess of marketing, and the approach to third-party releases wasn't good at all.

>>384171802
>1500043655530m
whatever you say, no.

>>384173131
>that reply
>whatever you say,no
LOL WHAT?
EXPOSED

>>384173336
just stop

>>384173101

>Disgaea 5 Switch sold well

reminder that Xenoblade 2 is guaranteed to sell amazing because it will be the first major release JRPG exclusive to the console. Kind of how Golden Sun did so well.

>>384171802
welcome to neotendo

>>384172668
2 runs better than 1 and looks worse.

>>384173576

Golden Sun did well because it was great.

>>384171802

>HOW DARE THOSE PEOPLE WANT GAMES FOR THEIR CONSOLE

File: csKJtxk.gif (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

>>384173450
>just stop
ohhhhhhhhh the irony

>>384173789

are you implying XC2 won't be? Also don't fib you know being released near the GBA launch helped it immensely stand out.

>>384173764

Even the remaster?

>>384172023
> you're saying the Switch needs 20m+ before devs do anything.

You literally pulled a number out of your ass and claimed it came from me and that it was an absolute before people cares in response to a post where I straight told you that they will begin development when the larger install base is insured.

I even highlighted it for you.

>>384173991

Only implying that people like to use the "only jrpg" insult at GS.

>>384156168
>huge business opportunity
>expecting Nintendo fans to play dark souls

Between you, me, and my little cousins that I introduced to the series, who else will buy this? I doubt they'll break even at 3 copies

>>384171802
reminder

reminder
>>384171802

>>384174254

>implying DaS children won't buy Switch consoles to play it

I dont think I've read a more disappointing thread. Obviously they cant put these games on the Switch. The market simply isnt there. Nobody wants to port one of the most acclaimed franchises in recent history to a glorified fucking tablet. The system can barely even run Skyrim. Portable souls would have no online features. Theres no way in fuck ds3 is compatible with it. Are people really that hopeful in Nintendo? They may as well be their own market by this point, nobody would give a fuck about Nintendo if not for their IPs.

>>384164539
Just watch a let's play in 480p if you want to see it on a sub-par console.

>>384174614
>DaS children
oh KEK it's like
>pls put it on switch even though i don't want it

>>384168326
The right is more attractive in general, but smaller breasts and wearing a jacket. The one on the left is just a generic whore.

>>384174753

>PLEASE PUT PERSONA 4 GOLDEN ON VITA SO 3DSFAGS CAN'T HAVE IT

I can be silly too.

>>384156168
would this even be up to From? i figured it would be Namco's decision.

>>384168326

post your face when you found out they were fake

>>384175062
Unless namco owns the games outright, which they don't, then From would have to approve it.

File: 1497890149943.jpg (92KB, 676x575px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 676x575px

>>384174991
lol @ you. there is no need for you to feel this threatened, manbabby

>>384170918

>Nintendo needs to put third party stuff on Switch
>LOL WHO CARES THEY WON'T SELL ANYWAY
>Nintendo doesn't get third party titles
>WHAT THE FUCK WHY DOESN'T NINTENDO HAVE THIRD PARTY TITLES?

it's a catch-22 with you drones.

>>384168470
>dark souls 2 producer
>knowing anything about what the audience for dark souls is

I mean, he made Dark Souls 2, I think that's argument enough that he has no clue what he's talking about.

>>384175190
oh i guess you're right. Namco just owns the trademark, not the IP itself. guess it would take both of them.

>>384175225

>threatened

you're the one say DaS on Switch won't push systems.

>>384174117
>You literally pulled a number out of your ass and claimed it came from me
Switch has atleast 3-4 million sales. Multiplied by "6" equals 18m-24m sales. That's your 20m.

Either way, your victim act is boring me so I'm wrapping this with a simple point. Devs have noticed the early success in both hardware and software sales and are doing something about it now. Switch will get games starting next year. It just wont be everything.

File: 1453946286661.png (190KB, 340x384px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 340x384px

>people refuse to buy the PC versions because they only play on consoles

What do they say about sour grapes?

File: 1500192321042.jpg (30KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 640x360px

>>384175550
i didn't say anything before that post ITT. stop feeling so threatened, and gather your words next time

>>384174659
>I dont think I've read a more disappointing thread.
And you managed to make it worse. Congrats.

>>384175580

>It just wont be everything.

why should normies give a shit if they won't get the latest AAA shooter, Rockstar game or Bethesda game?

>>384175365
cry more nintenbro

>easily outsell all the other platform's sales combined.

Pump the breaks fanboy. It would sell, but lets slow the fuck down and be real.

>>384175961
XD

>>384156168
Dark Souls 3 can't even run properly on PS4, no way in hell could it ever run on Switch

>>384174991
persona is playstation only now

>>384175881

Who says it wont get a Rockstar are Beth game? 2k is fully supporting the Switch and Beth will have a game on a Nintendo platform for the first time in decades. I doubt that goes to waste.

File: an extreme thirst.jpg (11KB, 261x193px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 261x193px

>BOTW struggles to run at 30 FPS on the switch despite multiple patches
>people think it could run even the first Dark Souls

not with that dogshit storage

>>384176150

>persona is playstation only

How did Q happen?

>>384175580
>You said they'd only care when it sold 20 million!
But I never once said that and directly told you that that they would be getting on board for later on when the install base would be there. I only ever said they don't have support coming out RIGHT NOW because the install base is too small RIGHT NOW.

Jesus christ you are incapable of reading what you reply to.

File: ce1a3e64eef0257ed664584e5929ca0d.png (70KB, 134x191px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 134x191px

>>384176345
Not to sure about that

>>384176273
Nintendo's audience pretty much dictates they only get leftovers, like a port of a ten year old game. Which is what Bethesda is giving them.

Bethesda knows where their audience is, rockstar, too.

>>384174001
On pc yeah, but maybe that's just the shitty port.

>>384176681
>what are spinoffs what is donkey kong what is multiple mario games

>>384177049

Nah, that's just standard water testing protocol. If the ports do well, they will turn into newer stuff. That's why NIS basically promised support after Disgaea 5.

>>384177591
They will never get date of multiplat releases from those developers.
Especially rockstar.

>>384177084

Probably both.

>>384177895

Depends on the game. RDR2? Likely not unless they have a mad scientist on their development team. A hypothetical new Midnight Club or X City Stories? Maybe.

>>384157393
Mine is BB > DaS2 > DeS > DaS1 > DaS3

>>384156168
Why the fuck do people think fromsoft will do this? I mean all of this belongs to namco, why wouldn't they just outsource all this shit?

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA

File: Souls list.png (2MB, 4589x404px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4589x404px

>>384157393
You forgot the most important Souls game!

Also your list is shit anyway, let me fix her up for you.

>>384157359
Mario has been utterly unimpressive for years. Rename those games Jump Guy and Friends and nobody would give a shit.

>>384178454
Because no ones knows what From's working on right now.

>>384179025
Likely shovelware. They're not going to put one of their core franchises on the Switch, even if it is just a port.

>>384179025
From already released a game for the 3ds. Also from is working on 3 games. 1 is a sci fi (i think metroid), one fantasy rpg and one vr. Vr is sony exclusive, fantasy rpg probably too

File: TheDarkSoulsOfCrash.jpg (25KB, 320x288px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 320x288px

>>384179319
Cool. I'm be down for another Cookies and Cream game.

>>384156168
>some buttblasted nintenbro made this picture that took him 20 hours

Whatever nerds, I'm gonna go fap to 2D TRAPS now, you faggots

I'm sorry nintendo fans but the switch will die just like the wii u did

The PS3 outlived the Wii U lmao

>>384171802
>all the source of shitposting can be traced back to them
when did this turn into a post about sony fans?

>>384181930
>The PS3 outlived the Wii U lmao
Why would you announce that you are underaged?

>>384171802
This anon is completely right.
They make threads about 3DS games unbearable because they ask why its not on Switch and cry about 3DS still being alive
They make threads about Wii U games unbearable because they just beg for ports and talk about how shitty the Wii U is (while demanding ports for every game on it)
They make threads about PS4 games unbearable for obvious reasons
Switchfags are the worst