Stonehearth

>>384036162
It's not worth $25

>t. someone who put 40 hours into it

Memory leaks an optimization problems galore when you have many villagers

>>384036162
Development is happening too slowly for my tastes. I get the feeling this is one that will never be released

>>384036457
Also didn't mean to make that sound negative. The game is great fun and really scratched a city building itch that I had

It is comfy and it seems to know what kind of game it wants to be. As it is right now though, mining and building is glitchy and awkward especially trying to do interior walls. I also wish they'd change the fucking name.

>>384036162
It's a casual RNG fest. You should play Gwynt instead.

>>384037571
>Gwynt
Are you referring to some other city builder, or are you completely off topic, talking about that stupid Witcher card game?

even Gnomoria is better and it sucks compared to Dwarf Fortress

>>384036162
I love this game, but the AI is kind of dumb. I have yet to get a village to successfully build more than two buildings without them becoming pants on head stupid. There's so much you need an early town to be doing, and with seven starting villagers, they get super confused about what to prioritize. It's a good game, but incredibly frustrating.

Also, the need for high stat villagers is frustrating, especially since you have to randomly roll them all to get good ones. You need a half dozen smart crafters if you want to level them fast, your trappers/shepards need high spirit, your fighters all need body and spirit, and your cleric needs high EVERYTHING. But here, have an 8th villager with 2-2-2 stats, it's not like you were starved for useful villagers as is

i think i voted for it on greeenlight 4 years ago but i dont buy into early access games