2 > 3 > 1
Haven't played 4 as I never owned a PS3, but it seems like crap. Thankfully my PS2 still works.
>>383920343
I've only played 4 and frankly I don't want to play the other ones even though I own them. 4 was pretty damn good but all I hear are bad things about the others like one of them is purely minigames. Thanks but no thanks I'll enjoy my 4
>>383920698
>I don't want to play the other ones even though I own them
Why do you own them and why wouldn't you want to play them? Just so you know, 2 is actually a brilliant game.
2 > 1 > 3 > 4
You can't argue against this.
>>383920932
>Why do you own them
I liked 4 so much I bought the collection on a sale.
>and why wouldn't you want to play them
literally just posted why in the post you're responding to.
>>383921360
3 > 2 > 4 > 1
3 has best locations and missions
I just did
>>383920343
4 > 1 > 2 > 3
>>383920932
Two is the second worst game in the series and is the sole reason 3 is such a shitshow. The game is called Sly Cooper, not Sly and Friends. Every fucking game is finely tuned around sly and his movement through environments. Sly 4 actually did additional characters right by either limiting them to the point where them not seeing any action is a plot point or making their gameplay identical to sly's.
>>383921492
The reason I value 2 over 3 is because of the story and atmosphere. For a kids' game, 2 felt surprisingly serious at times, while 3 was just too ridiculous for my taste.
Sly 5 when?