Truth.

Is there even a point in getting 300+ fps if monitor refresh rate is still lower?

If people were dying to play Quake they would stil be playing Quake, but they're not
PC players want Battlegrounds and Overwatch, this is an indisputable fact

>>383887023
Yes.

>>383887023
Less tearing

>>383886752
Ability to comprehend that comp players don't want visual elements which actually detract from the ability to play.
Same reason we nuke dust, smoke and everything else which makes it harder to see.

>>383887095
Quake doesn't have enough marketing and porn (marketing)

>>383887095
Because PC gaming has been overrun with consolefags.
All those MASTER RACE memes and console war threads left their mark.

>>383887023

Input is polled once per frame, so if you get 140+ FPS you're getting better feeling mouse input even with a 60hz monitor

>>383887206
Wait a second isn't the tearing a product of having higher fps than refresh rate?

>>383887221

Competitive fags are the worst.

I wont play an online game if it doesn't have excessive visual noise making it hard as fuck to see.

I only play ROOST, RO2, RS1, RS2, Insurgency and Day of Infamy.

I like Quake's single player but would never be interested in touching the MP.

>>383887342
no

>>383887679
Doubt

>>383887841
no

>>383887206
There will be 5 tears at 600 fps

>>383888176
This "no" can only count if you have VSync on.

>>383887346
So basically you play games with low skill ceilings, while never overcoming real challenges? I'm not sure that its something to be proud of.

>>383886752
I have no idea what this pic is implying, please explain.

>>383887023
Your question contradicts itself. The refresh rate determines the maximum possible framerate.

>>383887346
You know you can leave all the awful shit on if you want, right? And that quake's multiplayer is mostly super casual ffa and ca that you can just drop in and out whenever.

>>383888479
Console players only care about grafix, especially pretty setpieces that they can stare at
PC players only care about the gameplay

>>383888479
PC user actually play games that looks like shit.

>>383888958
It would make more sense if they showed screenshots of console versions of crysis.

>>383888298
You do not know how computer works

>>383887023
attaining higher fps causes better frame pacing for some games because the game has more frames to choose from...

>>383888931
>"haha looks like shit"
>"gotta buy another GTX 1080 Ti"
>"who cares about gameplay it runs at THIRTY FPS"

Sure pcbros are the ones who care about gameplay.

pc is still superior. But pc masterrace is a joke.

>>383889462
Well then explain to me how there can be no screen tearing with 300fps on 60Hz monitor without any sync.

>>383888319

I don't play these games to show off my mad skills retard. In fact I am open about the fact that a lot of those games, like RO2 aren't even skill based. A lot of it is luck based. I play them for fun and realism. I don't care about winning as much as I care about the experience of playing, and having fun. What I want is a very realistic war game, but isn't super clunky like a simulator and is still fun to play.

I mean I play Quake as well, and I played Natural Selection as well when it wasn't dead. I just prefer realism based FPS games. I will get Squad too when it finishes since Project Reality was fantastic.

You saw low skill ceiling like it's a bad thing. Difficultly, as long as it isn't piss easy casual shit, isn't really as important as you'd like to believe. It just had to be hard enough to be entertaining.

>>383889997
I didn't say no tearing, just less.

>>383890308
How can it be lesser than 0?

>>383890368
what are negative values? where did you go to school?

>>383890405
Man if screen tearing can go below 0 then I gotta try playing on -60 fps

>>383890513
feels good man

>>383886752
thats why arena shooter are dead, right?

>>383886752
pc players didn't want quake live

no one wanted quake live

>>383886752
totes mcgotes ;)

>>383890738
>>383890616
You're ruining the fun