GRAPHICS Thread

ARMA (2 and 3) looks like you take a PS3 game and add a gigantic LOD mod

File: arma3_2.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>383680114
I guess it's kinda true, I still find it impressive.

>>383680264
>360p in a graphics thread

File: div (18).jpg (2MB, 2748x2061px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2748x2061px

>>383680067

File: Showroom_ferrari_f80_2-6-2017-21-16-39.jpg (672KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

672KB, 3840x2160px

>>383681859

File: 1499775624665.jpg (166KB, 1441x977px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1441x977px

Why are these shit threads always neglecting art design? Who gives a fuck about texture resolution apart from normies and shills for 600 bucks (((graphic cards)))

>>383682159
Because it's the graphics thread, not the art style thread you muppet.

>>383682301
who gives a fuck about graphics, it's just technical power tacked on art design

File: 20170710215746_1.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>383682301

File: grappa2.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

>>383682402
>who gives a fuck about graphics, it's just technical power tacked on art design
I do

>>383682163
nice speed

File: noblur.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>383682625

File: fortress3.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>383682720
looks like trash

>>383682684
plastic foliage
looks like bf3 but more stuff on screen

File: 1499691862700.png (73KB, 554x400px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 554x400px

>>383682881
>mountains in the distance hidden behind some kind of blue fog
>that tree

>>383682948
looks like shit

File: forest2.jpg (4MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3840x2160px

>>383682909
>plastic foliage
nice meme

>>383683005
nice bloom

>>383681078
why is the sky in the reflection different

File: fortress2.jpg (898KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

898KB, 3840x2160px

>>383682986
>lo-looks like shit

nice frog

File: grappa3.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

>>383683045
looks good to me

>>383683117
that grappa map is just shit and ur screenshot had low-res textures everywhere

>>383683348
looks better than trashfield

File: nights3.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>383683279
>low-res textures everywhere
where for example?

File: fortress1.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>383683434
>>383683279
>>383683045
>>383682986
>>383682909

>two word replies
contain your nitpick autism worthless trashposter

File: 20170710124300_1.jpg (884KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

884KB, 3840x2160px

>>383683448
>cant see shit except some lights
>OWAH IMPRESSIVE

File: 1495568771418.png (90KB, 250x237px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 250x237px

>>383683614
>DONT CRITICIZE MY GAME GRRAAAAAA

>>383683701
Stop trying. No one thinks you're smart.

File: night2.jpg (4MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3840x2160px

>>383683651
>every single artillery shell, wood plank, brickstone is rendered at such a far distance
>ONLY SOME LIGHTS LOOOL

kil yourself retard

File: 287390_20170330214607_1.png (957KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

957KB, 1920x1080px

>>383682707
it's in miles I swear I was going faster

>>383680067
What game?

File: 1448587351772.jpg (35KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 300x300px

Alright we get it Mr. Electronic Arts hot shot, your games look great on your $8000 Personalized Computing Platform and your biceps are fuckhuge. There are multiple games on the market that have superior skyboxes though. Make a third person action rpg with frobyte already, because only then will I give a fuck about your shooty bang bang we was kangz games.

>>383684213
you don't need an 8000 pc to make frostbyte games look good, they look fine on toasters, just look at the console versions.

File: 20170710224344_1.jpg (446KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 3840x2160px

>>383684023
nigger its dark as fuck you can see shit in that screenshot

>>383684316
Yeah, that's true. It's a incredible engine but I want a game like Witcher 3 on it, I'd buy the hell out of it

File: df250708-a692-4e18-b561-dcdf94db8ed4_mea_sept20_1_pdp_screenhi_1920x1080_en_ww.jpg (217KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1920x1080px

>>383684735

File: full-12102-11588-comanche_gold_custom_mission_7_slaves.avi_000089541.jpg (118KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1024x768px

1997 3D graphics
MS-DOS game
fight me /v/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d480zpAQu08

File: IMG_1023.jpg (26KB, 184x184px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 184x184px

>>383684543
Looks fine on my screen, fix your gamma/brightness

File: DDO9cUuXUAAYSN8.jpg (127KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 960x960px

>>383685162
nigga its a night/dark map, you donmt see as much as you would if that was a daytime map.

now neck yourself, battlefield looks bad with shit textures if you look closely

>>383681859
>>383682039
wtf i thought asseto corsa was ugly. must be the track and environments that are

>>383685481
Battlefield 1 is fucking beautiful with great textures. Please note how you've failed to actually point out your shitty textures. It might not be a great game, but it sure looks good.

>>383685684
lay down and look at the ground textures in that forest map for example, pure dogshit. battlefront looks better

>>383684543
>>383685481
it really looks fine my dude
try setting your contrast lower

File: 20161104031254_1.jpg (441KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 1920x1080px

I would've posted good graphics but my hdd died with all the good stuff on it so here's this

>>383683246
what game?

File: 1499825880590.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>383682402
>realism in videogame visuals is just technical power slapped on design
poor bait if you'd know what goes into that, I lean towards unique art styles too but that's why it's a graphics thread, but nothing's stopping you from posting your favorites

>>383683448
horrible

>>383691528
This makes my dick hard

File: Screenshot (22).png (3MB, 2560x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2560x1080px

Most of my screenshots are way over the file size limit

when will one of these games have actual good gameplay!? i just want a good game with these graphics,is that too much to ask?

File: 6gQvECq.png (1MB, 2560x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1080px

>>383691731
desu that screenie looked like shit, way worse than what the game actually looks like

File: 0yGJTlX.jpg (653KB, 5120x1080px) Image search: [Google]

653KB, 5120x1080px

>>383691957
In-game vs photo mode with some tweaking, couldn't get it to look the same way and it was quite frustrating

>>383692185
in other words the real thing vs bullshot generator

>tfw I'm just a pleb who loves playing in 200 fps instead of jerking to grass

>>383680114
true to SOME extent, but the LOD/scale is ridiculously impressive

>>383692378
Not an argument

>>383691913
I don't think it's rare occasion to have great graphics and gameplay at all. Doom 2016 looked great and it played nicely.

While technically not very impressive, the aesthetics of Nier Automata were pretty great, and it's a great game.

>>383684159
I'd say ArmA 3, with all that undisturbed open space

>>383682986
>>mountains in the distance hidden behind some kind of blue fog

seems you have no fucking idea how real world works

>>383691954
Is it impossible for consoles to into ansiotropic filtering?

File: 60VliQq.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>383692290
Yeah, although to be fair most of the time it looks way worse, taking a picture that looks good in photo mode is a pain in the ass, the new drone camera added in FH3 is pretty neat, because it's basically an ingame photo mode and works in multiplayer.

I'm going to try resizing some screenies I have from the drone camera to upload them

>>383681078
>take mediocre graphics
>add reflections on wet roads only
>OMG IT'S SO PRETTY

It's like every gta 5 mod but done even worse.

>>383683084
>>383692975
that's the new Infamous isn't it? Yeah why are the reflections orange, it's like the sky is burning or something

File: 20170712163352_1.jpg (390KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 1920x1080px

>>383692564
oh, fuck me, it's right in filename
have Hard Reset screenshot, back when Flying Wild Hogs were still indie devs
>>383682881
I was about to brofist you, but then I realised it's not Gothic 3.

File: rsz_11dzbenet.png (2MB, 1920x810px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x810px

>>383692948
Ok it's lower res to fit the 4mb limit but here's a pic from the drone camera

File: rsz_whqr0eh.png (2MB, 1920x810px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x810px

>>383693290
Here's antoher one, looks a bit worse because of the wet effect on the camera but it's still pretty good

File: KEK.jpg (136KB, 705x960px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 705x960px

>>383692942
pls reply

File: 1491992823101.jpg (120KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1920x1080px

>>383692942
>>383693463
It depends on the game but final fantasy is known for not being able to get into this kind of thing.

File: 1471646431776.jpg (727KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

727KB, 2560x1440px

Does anyone have some pics of Horizon Zero Dawn? I know we're supposed to hate it since it look better than most PC games, but you can't deny that the Decima Engine is a marble.

File: 20170125081008_1.jpg (150KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 1920x1080px

This game was such a bitch to get running well, but it does look pretty good.
Not a Hero when?

File: bXc8gM6.jpg (1MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1440px

>>383691296
Battlefield 1

File: otter_frog_800.jpg (158KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 800x800px

>>383693556
Yes but I feel as though there is an abnormally high amount of games when looking at screenshots from conole that don't into it and the performance cost is very low.

File: remake.jpg (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>383693679
I haven't played this game, but from the pictures I've seen is like they actually managed to make the game look as good as the prerendered backgroung of REmake. It loooks really nice.

File: 214490_screenshots_20170527172041_1.jpg (474KB, 4800x900px) Image search: [Google]

474KB, 4800x900px

Alien: Isolation.

>>383693979
Welcome to the world of console optimization

In the 7th gen developers started having games with very very narrow Field of View, so with less shit to render, the games perform much better. That's what happens when you want to push the graphics bar on a closed spec machine. Compromises will have to be made. Later console games were running 25FPS on top of all kinds of graphical compromises to stay "playable".

Look at a comparison between GTAV on PS3/360 and on new consoles and PC, the amounts of pop in going fast on a car just to crash on something that didn't load yet, is absolutely disgusting.

Could it be that there's some issue with having AF, or could be developers opting for whatever performance advantages they can grab, what is the cost, 1FPS? Might be enough to hit the 30FPS stable standard

File: ACS_20170706_19363613.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

Syndicate looks amazing even on normal settings.

File: LaNoire 2017-03-29 20-32-44-352.jpg (777KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

777KB, 1920x1080px

>>383696153
Syndicate actually runs well as well.
>>383695062
Consoles are cancer.

>>383680067
>>383680114

The background looks like a fucking skybox.

File: amalur.png (1MB, 1280x721px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x721px

>>383682159
>art design

File: The Witcher 3 Screenshot 2017.04.24 - 23.21.31.19.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>383680264
The fuck are you doing anon?

>>383696646
every time i see pictures of this game i get kind of sad. the world looked so great, detailed, and lived-in. but it was just so mediocre. i had no interest in the characters or story, and the combat felt really bad. such a waste.