Will it be good?
>EA
>No confirmation of Droidekas
I unno you tell me.
>>383655758
It will be alright. This should have been the 1st battlefront remake (1st was a joke) and there probably shouldn't have been a second
>>383655758
I'm also curious about that.
>>383655758
Guys I'm thinking of preordering it onPC
Save me from the mistake I know it is.
fpbp
>>383655758
>EA game
>Will it be good
i want him in the game
>>383656672
Just wait a single week and see if it's good jesus fucking christ. Preordering digital content is a fucking blatant scam.
>>383656751
Battlefield BC2, And to a slightly lesser extent BF3 and BF4 were all good games. Ea are scum but that doesn't preclude them from making good games
>>383656939
>BF3 was a good game
Christ.
>>383657207
No other shooter at the time allowed 64 player servers and actually had the player base to fill them
>>383656939
eh, they're competent-ish games.
they're just really boring and limited due to a lack of mods and custom-maps. EA's obsession with "consistency" robs games of any community or flavor they might be able to support or possess.
>>383657207
But it's multiplayer mode at the time was indeed very nice.
>>383655819
>Droidekas
Too OP. Maybe they will come with a killstreak function so that everyone doesn't just pick the same class.
>>383655758
>no vehicles spawning on map even though they have a solution for camping in the game with the point system
>no way to steal enemy vehicles
>no way for two people to get in one vehicle meaning snowspeeders are still shit
>have yet to confirm non on rail at-at in any game mode
so far the game just has content and classes but is still a piece of shit if you like star wars vehicles
>get conned in the first game
>I-is the second one going to be good?
>>383657549
I was thinking they would be a hero class. Makes sense since they were expensive and rare.
>>383657207consider getting some help
>>383655758
You wont stop hearing about it for a while. Then no one will play it.
>>383657757
It will be better then Battlefronts, but that's not saying much
>>383657426
Joint Ops has allowed 150 player matches since 2005
YES NO MAYBE I DON'T KNOW CAN YOU REPEAT THE QUESTION
YOUR NOT THE ADVICE GOD DAMN IM SO WAITING FOR A CALL ME DOWN FOR A CALL ME DOWN FOR A CALL ME DOWN FOR A HIRED ME DOWN FOR A CALL ME DOWN FOR A CALL ME DOWN FOR A HIRED ME DOWN FOR A HIRED ME DOWN FOR A HIRED ME DOWN FOR A HIRED ME DOWN FOR A
>>383657524
>>383657426
>and actually had the player base to fill them
this is due to marketing/hype, doesn't mean it was really good.
64 player multiplayer-games had existed on and off.
the only thing Frostbite Battlefield games did/do that's impressive is the terrain destruction/deformation, and to a lesser degree graphics (though I don't really care about graphics).
Everything else feels pretty average and casual/dumb.
The lack of a Dedicated Server Client(that can be run/hosted on User PC's and not "rented") in my opinion renders this advantage moot, since it prevents the playerbase from exploring the mechanics/messing with things to get mods and custom maps
>but muh CTE
CTE's are a shit-tier substitute for modding and map-making.
>>383656672
Just wait till some e-celeb fuck gets an early copy and then watch it.
>>383656939
pleb. everyone that played BF2 knows it was better than all the successors after DICE went to total shit.
t. commander lover
It will be nice I think. I'm getting it. I'm hoping for a new MovieBattles eventually
>>383657558
>no way for two people to get in one vehicle meaning snowspeeders are still shit
I don't get why they're having so much trouble grasping this. Gunner and driver is in battlefield games right? Such a simple concept.