Is he, dare I say it, /ourguy/?
He's usually been our guy, even before this critic video
>all that butthurt generated
why are vidya critics so pathetic?
Fuck off underage
Ecelebs do not belong here
They never have
And they never will
He literally played on the old league /v/ threads but /v/ is too underaged-filled to remember
>>383471836
Ok let's see where this goes. His last vid was well written, but I think it is not necessary for a good critic to be consistent. It is important to assume the reader is a retard that forgets a critic is an opinion after about half a sentence. It is much more important to stick to that to remind the reader that it's a game that people only have opinions about them and that the critc should just say what he liked and disliked about the game and people get an idea if they would like the game aswell based on this opinion. No one will read this text though.
>Had the God Hand vs. Imagine Baby's image in video
Most definitely.
I tried watching "best of" videos of him, but only managed to grin a few times. How is he so popular?
>>383471836
E celeb that plays whatever is popular and acts like he has original opinions yeah he is basically /v/
>>383471836
I disagree with the concept of /ourguy/
I do however enjoy his content
>>383472247
lack of quality competition
>>383472307
But can we agree that Sucy is /ourgal/?
>>383472307
>>383472354
>>383472356
Fuck off you fucking avatarfag
>>383472356
Most definitely
How did his video get so many views? Where are they sharing it?
>>383472247
Dunkey got popular by playing League of Legends at it's peak and quit at the perfect time.
>>383472389
all three of us have different organization systems in our filename. For example I have an underscore and a four digit fail safe incase I go over 999 (its happened before) while that other guy is just the number
>>383472002
I haven't heard about any butt hurt yet, should I be expecting it soon?
someone post the critics reactions, i missed it last thread
E-celebs are not vidya
>But /v/ is already filled to the brim with shit, it doesnt make a difference it I take a shit on it too
It does. Fuck off to /tv/
>>383472613
>>383472618
>Everyone thinks his Jontron video was Dunkey being serious
>People getting mad over him saying the word faggot on twitch
>>383472247
The same autistic teenagers that enjoy Filthy Frank, Shrek and SFM memes also obsess over dunkey.
He's nothing special, aspies just enjoy it.
>>383472691
I mean, what Patricia Hernandez said is true. But it doesn't mean people trust that body of work.
>>383472613
Dunkey exposed in a video titled game critics that most or nearly all game reviewers are self contradicting pieces of shit that just say what they feel on the fly, always contradict their own scores with their own words, and that basically when gamergatte was about journalists being corrupt, they were right.
>>383472691
what is that, like eight people? I don't know if this is enough to be called a shit storm, but /v/ has stirred up way more out of way less I guess, good luck shit stirers.
>>383472691
>that well thought out response on the right
Wow
>>383472869
This, desu, no idea why it's there if the purpose of the image is to show idiotic responses like that dude in the bottom left
>>383472082
>acting like you aren't 13
>>383472691
You can tell he hit a nerve. They are clearly insecure about what even they are saying.
>Actually fucking cites verbatim times where review scores on record contradict what is being said
>Every "professional reviewer" is basically having a bitchfit because he fucking exposed so many of them as being fucking huge liars
Its fucking hilarious. Nothing says "I am guilty" more then just whiny complaining instead of actually trying to refute his evidence.
He has also opened my eyes. I am NEVER listening to any reviewer who claims to be a freelancer ever again. That basically states that they review games as a hobby. A side project. They don't even take their own fucking job seriously, so why should anybody else?
>>383472691
delicious. thanks.
clips.twitchDOTtv/ThoughtfulPlumpSwallowYouWHY
>>383472869
It's not much of a reaction but it's also just a bunch of rambling. Despite lots of text she didn't pinpoint anything so I wouldn't call it well thought out.
>>383473368
>you will never marry an anime
how did he do it lads?
>>383473192
They literally work for a job without purpose the Hype machine convinces the majority of people to buy and word of mouth from friends or seeing people stream convinces the rest. They have to at least try justifying and defending what they do otherwise they have to realize that reality.
They have literally no purpose their critiques of games are rushed and made to be as simple as possible with a score. They can't ever really piss off any of the Major publishes because getting a game on launch day to start your review when everyone else has had it for 2 weeks and has a review ready fucks their whole business model.
>auto-sage