Predict its metacritic score

98

88?

102

>>383441204
97

93

people will be mixed about capturing and its prevalence

99.99 (repeating, of course)

>>383441204
12

>>383441204
I would say over 90 but currently now sony fans are going through a fit of pretending they love crash and that its the best platforming series ever made so they'll probably bomb it lower

67 too much racism and misogyny

83, maybe add 5 more points for Mariobonus.

>>383441427
Alright time's up, let's do this.

>>383441204
110

96 screencap this

>>383441204
98, 97 after BORN DIFFERENT reviews it.

My last 2 digits are the metacritic score

File: CJ5BU93UYAAw8uT.png (563KB, 600x647px) Image search: [Google]

563KB, 600x647px

>>383441204
60

>>383441204
98

>>383441204
above 90 unless they fuck it up

97+ because big companies like Nintendo buy reviews newfags

99

>>383441204
76

File: 1499141382740.jpg (33KB, 720x711px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 720x711px

>>383441204
Speaking as a PCfat, 94 - 100

100 is a big fucking stretch because Nintendo has Jim Sterling to worry about, it WILL be in the high 90s though.

>>383442912
Nice try, but it's been stated repeatedly that Nintendo doesn't buy reviews and doesn't even give a shit about reviews for the most part. Unlike Sony, which has literally been caught paying for reviews on multiple occasions for games and movies.

these digits

>>383444548
>>383442691
Here's a better idea, predict the layout of Jim's review

>game is good
>here's a nitpick I will focus on for 3 paragraphs
>"""casually""" brings up nintendo's youtube program again and his nintendo's videos getting ads
>7/10

>>383441204

My last 2 digits rounded to the nearest 98.

>>383441204
8.8

>>383441204
97-98

>>383441204
95+

>>383444717

You would think if they paid for reviews, they would do it for games that actually need it, rather than a console Mario or Zelda which will always score above 90 just by being good. Splatoon got mixed reviews because of its lack of content at launch and ended up with a 81. They did the same thing again for ARMS, which has a 77, and they're doing it again for Splatoon 2 too. It shows they don't give a shit about the reviews.
People cry paid reviews yet a majority of Nintendo's decent titles are in the 80 range nowadays. Heaven forbid their big games actually manage to get a high score, it has to be paid reviews.

>>383444717
1-2 Switch got a 5.8

>>383441204

Games trailers look kinda mediocre. Which given the history of Nintendo means the actual released game will be amazing. And given the history of reviewers, they will give it a lower score than it deserves.

I'm gonna guess 9.2. It'll get a 9.0 automatically for being a Mario game. Anything higher is just based on fan hype.

>>383441204

100

doesn't matter what you think, Mario fans are probably going to love it and be happier than anyone else on this forum.

last two digits of your post number, 00=100
go

>>383446884
>It'll get a 9.0 automatically for being a Mario game

Theres tons of Mario games with lower scores than that though?

>>383442912
>>383444717
>>383445789
Nobody fucking buys reviews you god damn conspiracy theorists.

>>383449996
Those were 5.0-6.0 games that got a nice bump just because it's Mario like anything related to the NSMB games or the bad Paper Mario games. Mario Party doesn't count because they were made by slaves to pad out libraries and were going to be fucking awful in any case.

>>383450354
You can't just list 4 game series that contradict your argument and that continue to stand by this imaginary rule that Mario games get bumped up.

God forbid they're actually good games.