[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Graphics Thread

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 479
Thread images: 211

File: forest1mblimit.jpg (4MB, 3800x2137px) Image search: [Google]
forest1mblimit.jpg
4MB, 3800x2137px
only the best graphics
>>
File: forest2.jpg (4MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
forest2.jpg
4MB, 3840x2160px
>>
File: forest3.jpg (4MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
forest3.jpg
4MB, 3840x2160px
>>
File: nights1.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
nights1.jpg
2MB, 3840x2160px
>>
File: nights2.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
nights2.jpg
2MB, 3840x2160px
>>
File: nights3.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
nights3.jpg
1MB, 3840x2160px
>>
File: grappa1.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
grappa1.jpg
2MB, 3840x2160px
>>
File: grappa2.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
grappa2.jpg
3MB, 3840x2160px
>>
File: grappa3.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
grappa3.jpg
3MB, 3840x2160px
>>
File: fortress1.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
fortress1.jpg
2MB, 3840x2160px
>>
File: fortress2.jpg (898KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
fortress2.jpg
898KB, 3840x2160px
>>
File: CitftRZWYAAkBYa.jpg (314KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
CitftRZWYAAkBYa.jpg
314KB, 1920x1080px
>>
File: fortress3.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
fortress3.jpg
1MB, 3840x2160px
>>
>>383267893
I hope you paid for the enhanced edition of Cuckoldry1, goyim.
>>
File: 1499499686720.gif (982KB, 320x287px) Image search: [Google]
1499499686720.gif
982KB, 320x287px
>>383266581
>>383266657
>>383266789
>crysis 1
>good graphics
>>
>>383268232
you're retarded
>>
File: desert3.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
desert3.jpg
2MB, 3840x2160px
>>383268232
I did and it's a fun game, now kill yourself virgin
>>
>>383268382
no that forest just looks like trash

Suez and Amiens are the only good looking maps
>>
>>383268428
>>383268125
for (You)
>>
File: DDD2_UgXUAA5TGA.jpg (332KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
DDD2_UgXUAA5TGA.jpg
332KB, 1920x1080px
>>
>Look at this forrest guys XD

literally just go to a forrest irl you fucking retards. this isn't video games, this is just wanking off to scenery
>>
File: battlefront.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
battlefront.jpg
2MB, 3840x2160px
>>383268926
>lmao just go outside xD

Neck yourself
>>
File: 12.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
12.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
>>
File: 5.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
5.png
3MB, 1920x1080px
>>
>>383271020
game?
>>
File: 6.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
6.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
>>
File: Bez nazwy-4.jpg (882KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Bez nazwy-4.jpg
882KB, 1920x1080px
>>383266581
>>
File: 1.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
1.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
>>383271209
actual graphics
>>
File: 7.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
7.png
3MB, 1920x1080px
>>
>>383266581
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
>>
>>383268428
How did you unlock that uniform for Big Boss?
>>
File: Bez nazwy-1frghh.jpg (881KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Bez nazwy-1frghh.jpg
881KB, 1920x1080px
>>383271318
>>
File: 10.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
10.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
>>
File: CsldRDQVUAAWGCb.jpg (345KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
CsldRDQVUAAWGCb.jpg
345KB, 1920x1080px
>>
File: 8.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
8.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
>>
>>383271848
wut gaem?
>>
>>383266581
>Looks amazing but how's the gameplay?

>uuh.... it's your standard FPS and....

>Nevermind.
>>
>>383272202
btfo

come back when your favorite genre has good graphics
>>
Does "good graphics" mean "most photorealistic?" Because I love the graphics in, say, Super Mario 3D World but they're not even close to photorealistic.
>>
File: 9.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
9.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
>>
>>383267027

beautiful
>>
File: image.jpg (549KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
549KB, 1920x1080px
>>
File: 3.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
3.png
3MB, 1920x1080px
>>
>>383266581
>Fires don't emit light

What a waste.
>>
File: 4.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
4.png
3MB, 1920x1080px
>>
File: 2.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
2.png
3MB, 1920x1080px
>>
File: HOW.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
HOW.jpg
3MB, 3840x2160px
H O W
O
W

????

The game runs super smooth too
>>
>>383271541
>>383271318
Game?
>>
>>383272556

neogaf,
pls
>>
File: 14.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
14.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
>>
File: ghj,.jpg (849KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
ghj,.jpg
849KB, 1920x1080px
>>
does paragon have all random all mid?
>>
Post the tranny fairy already
>>
>>383272202
>standard FPS
it's just shit FPS
>>
File: 1467082626842.jpg (638KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
1467082626842.jpg
638KB, 3840x2160px
>>383266581
>>
File: Bez nazwy-1.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Bez nazwy-1.jpg
1MB, 1920x1080px
>>383272819
The crew, but this looks this good only in specific conditions and in photomode, unless you play in 4k.
>>
>>383272202
Go back to your visual novels buddy

>>383268461
>Suez
You mean St Quentin Scar
>>
>>383273116
Am currently building a machine capable of playing in 4k, until I buy the 4k display could I make it look this good in 1080 and be playable?
>>
File: Bez nazwy-10.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Bez nazwy-10.jpg
1MB, 1920x1080px
>>383273116
To be fair all photomode does it ads more control over photo and alow to make photo at very high resolution so aliasing is reduced. It doesnt "beautify" graphic.
>>
File: Bez nazwy-6.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Bez nazwy-6.jpg
1MB, 1920x1080px
>>383273282
Sure, I guess you could downscale it to 1080p Just be warned game sometimes doesnt look all that impressive, compared to lets say forza horizon, (too bad they did stupid hot wheels and map is small)
>>
File: CsLRyEAWcAAaxkh.jpg (348KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
CsLRyEAWcAAaxkh.jpg
348KB, 1920x1080px
>>
>>383272797
Jesus I wonder how much vram those textures consume.
>>
File: DDuE-DTVYAAb5AJ.jpg (96KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]
DDuE-DTVYAAb5AJ.jpg
96KB, 1200x675px
>Insantly looks better than anything on PC
How does Sony do it?
>>
>>383274037
>no blur behind glass
top kek
kurwa
>>
>>383274962
>burch
>>
File: PS4Switch.png (4MB, 1382x1555px) Image search: [Google]
PS4Switch.png
4MB, 1382x1555px
>>383274962
Gurilla games are gods
>>
>>383274962
Except it doesnt
>>
File: fish.webm (3MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]
fish.webm
3MB, 640x360px
>le static scenery you can't interact with
>>
File: TESV 2015-10-24 15-48-17-68.jpg (167KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]
TESV 2015-10-24 15-48-17-68.jpg
167KB, 1920x1200px
>>383274962
And this is a shitty mod for fucking skyrim.
>>
File: 1488960142292.png (1008KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
1488960142292.png
1008KB, 1280x720px
>>383275304
oh yeah, botw looks pretty good too!
>>
File: 1384394931212.jpg (89KB, 920x547px) Image search: [Google]
1384394931212.jpg
89KB, 920x547px
>>383275519

Moving the goalposts is an informal logical fallacy in which previously agreed upon standards for deciding an argument are arbitrarily changed once they have been met. This is usually done by the "losing" side of an argument in a desperate bid to save face. If the goalposts are moved far enough, then the standards can eventually evolve[1] into something that cannot be met no matter what (or anything will meet said standard if the losing side is trying to meet the standard using this tactic). Usually such a tactic is spotted quickly. Often, moving the goalposts is an exercise in slothful induction.
>>
>>383275304
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCEDlpaUXVE
>>
>>383275519
should have let it go longer so people can see how most the shit just despawns if you don't pick it up in time
>>
File: snowprints.webm (3MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]
snowprints.webm
3MB, 640x360px
>>383275746
>this mad
>>
>Zelda and Horizon screenshots
These games look really horrible.

I can't imagine there's anyone who disagrees that texture wise, Battlefield 1 and Battlefront lead the way by miles.

They are far from the best looking though. I'd still give that to Mirror's Edge.
>>
>>383275870
its a copypaste, this is a graphics thread not a tech thread
>>
File: C6smvFnVAAASXDi.jpg (90KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
C6smvFnVAAASXDi.jpg
90KB, 1280x720px
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (263KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault.jpg
263KB, 1280x720px
>>383274962
Putting all the detail withing twenty meters and hiding everything behind that with draw distance and fog

Photomode enhances LODs btw so it doesnt count
>>
File: dda.jpg (20KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]
dda.jpg
20KB, 540x540px
>>383275756
ahahahahh! nintendo fags BTFO :^))
>>
File: 1491362994213.jpg (109KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
1491362994213.jpg
109KB, 1280x720px
>>
>>383272340
I always go with graphics = technical stuff and visuals = both technical and artistic aspects.

This being said I personally rank the artistic side far higher, to me Rain World looks better than nearly all GRAFFIX games.
>>
File: 1491364181843.jpg (122KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
1491364181843.jpg
122KB, 1280x720px
>>
>>383276629
>>383276198
I can never really tell. Are these a joke? The only reason I'm unsure is because so many games look this hideous. I guess that means devs keep doing it because people like it?
>>
>>383275519
What Disney channel cartoon is this?
>>
>>383276791
>Oh man, I can't wait for 8k with 240 FPS, video games will be great again!

stop killing video games
>>
File: DD23McNUQAEjTg3.jpg (128KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
DD23McNUQAEjTg3.jpg
128KB, 1280x720px
>>383276791
no joke
>>
>>383276791
Yeah, people like good graphics. Why did you come into this thread?
>>
File: 20160711231057_1.jpg (398KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
20160711231057_1.jpg
398KB, 1920x1080px
It was all fun till the horizon shills showed up
>>
>>383275740
too bad the combat is boring as fuck and the game is a shitty ubisoft collectathon
>>
>>383277268
Nice contribution, now fuck off
>>
>>383277268
it's fun
>>
File: Deletes this.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Deletes this.png
3MB, 1920x1080px
>>383276209
>>
>>383277015
but Bore of the Wild doesn't have good graphics, like at all.
>>
File: 20170208052335_1.jpg (617KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
20170208052335_1.jpg
617KB, 1920x1080px
I wish he did more with this. Desert areas are cozy af.
>>
>>383277425
this webm does make it look pretty fun
>>
File: 20161020095051_1.jpg (439KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]
20161020095051_1.jpg
439KB, 1600x900px
>>383277564
I don't know if you want me to feel sad for you for coming into a thread dedicated to liking game visuals or what, but no one here cares what you have to say. Go back to Neogaf.
>>
So what is the OP's game?
>>
>>383276791
Screenshots really don't do BotW justice unless it's from Cemu. capture footage takes off the switch looked really fucking bad for some reason.
>>
>>383277774
cause it is pretty fun
>>
File: 20160424011235_1.jpg (648KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
20160424011235_1.jpg
648KB, 1920x1080px
>>
File: guarian's watery grave.webm (3MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]
guarian's watery grave.webm
3MB, 640x360px
>>383277774
>>
>>383277860
as long as you're admitting I'm right, I'll leave
>>
>>383266581
oh this thread again?
PC and consolefags fighting because PCbros can't accept console games can be pretty and sonybros spamming uc4 as if it was rpetty.
>>
File: 2014-12-02_00009-100534344-orig.jpg (811KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
2014-12-02_00009-100534344-orig.jpg
811KB, 1920x1080px
>>383278053
You can just leave without shitposting
>>
Is anyone else just not that impressed with graphics anymore? Like, none of it blows me out of my fucking chair like the GTA4 mods from 2011 did when they showed up. Nothing from this thread, really looks any better than the Unreal demos from 5 years ago did.
>>
Look at these cutting edge graphics of 1991
>>
>>383278143
UC4 is old news, now apparently they meme it with Horizon.
Haven't played Horizon myself but I find The Order's visuals more impressive, considering it's just the filters over filters that produce that look. Shame about it being a shitty game.
>>383278382
Do you have 4k display? 4k really steps it up for the visuals, making way for more fidelity. I've played some games at 1080p and when I switched to 4k I was blown away by the details on textures and little dynamic particles.
>>
File: 1498961459858.jpg (303KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
1498961459858.jpg
303KB, 1920x1080px
>>383277556
Nice marketing screenshot
>>
>>383277251
dude turn up that TSSAA X8 right fucking now ! or play in a higher res
>>
File: DdZ7cbd.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
DdZ7cbd.jpg
2MB, 3840x2160px
>>
>>383278671
Horizon does look pretty but it's not the best i've seen, and yeah The Order was shit and really pretty, but i didn't like the "cinematic" filters desu, i liked the colours, tone and overall feel it had though.
>>
>>383278671
4K is a meme with a small screen.

It's only good when you have a big display.
>>
>>383266581
>graphics thread

Finally, a summerfag general
>>
>>
>>383279027
Well, obviously. I have a 32'' monitor that doubles up as a display for movies, sometimes I sit at the distance of a stretched arm and that's when you see 4k in all its glory, but when my PC is too weak to handle 4k I grab a gamepad and land on the couch a few meters away and I honestly wouldn't be able to tell a difference with that shitty eyesight of mine (the only game that really looks noticeably worse in sub 4k is GTAV).
I'd say 32'' is ideal for keyboard+mouse experience but if you play on TV, in living room or something you'll have to invest in at least 50'' TV to see the difference.
>>
>>383279038
yep, all the nintendo marketers are contained here finally
>>
File: 35154594306_dd4bd62ded_o.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
35154594306_dd4bd62ded_o.png
3MB, 1920x1080px
>>383278839
>Marketing
Was taken on a standard ps4.
>>
>>383276209
>maxresdefault
>jpg
That's the name of the thumbnail of a video in a compressed format.
>>
File: you dont have to say anything.jpg (50KB, 504x544px) Image search: [Google]
you dont have to say anything.jpg
50KB, 504x544px
>>383279567
>>
>>383279429
You actually need a TV much much bigger than 50" to see the difference.
>>
>>383275304
>Gurilla

just give us another (good) KillZone gayme
>>
>>383279962
Depends on your room size. I've a small apartment so 60'' would already be an overkill.
>>
>>383278671
Ive been waiting for good 4k monitors to get under $1000. Do you really think 4k really make that much of a difference?
>>
>>383280490
>Depends on your room size

WHAT?
>>
>>383279634
Now turn off photomode :)
>>
>>383280621
Yes. What's not to understand? It's pretty normal for people to choose a TV size based on their room size.
>>
>>383280702
Why?
>>
>>383280813
and to add, proper viewing distance is a thing.
>>
>>383280576
It's double the resolution...
>>
>>383280902
Show us a picture without Photo mode - I want to see what you see when you're actually playing the game rather than the photo mode increasing LOD. Duuurrrr
>>
>>383280295
>Good
Can't give what doesn't exist. Fuck Guerrilla Games.
>>
>>383281013
Double? Might want to check your ALT-RIGHT FACTS.
>>
>>383274962
All these graphics wasted on this ugly """woman"""

Anyway Forza 7 will look awesome
>>
File: 1498528287631.jpg (4MB, 2350x3967px) Image search: [Google]
1498528287631.jpg
4MB, 2350x3967px
>>
>>383266581
>>383266789
>>383267281
>>383267418
>>383267540
>>383267679
>>383267893
>>383272797

Wow, hey anons, those are some beautiful graphics! But hey, you know, what would it be like if there was a way they could look EVEN better? Even more life-like...

You know, I heard the other day that there ARE even BETTER graphics, and not only that, they're interactive! You can TOUCH and FEEL them, it's amazing! You just have to put on some clothes, stop jacking off, and head out to the forests in the real wor-

Ah.. sorry... I forgot you don't like it when people mentioning the "out" word.. outs-.. Sorry! Please, I'll go make your tendies right away, just relax sweetie!
>>
>>383280813
>>383280920
But my point is that you need a BIG TV to display 4K, 4K in a little screen is a meme
>>
>>383281054
Doesn't increase the LOD.
>>
>>383280576
I do. I've had 2 32'' monitors side by side when I upgraded to 4k, the old one was 1080p. At first I was a bit off put by how blurry 1080p content looked at 4k compared to native 1080p monitor, almost to a point or returning it, but 4k makes all the difference - I remember vividly one particular moment when I could tell the girl's eyes had contacts on them by the black texture near iris in one of demo videos. Just make sure you have a GPU capable of pulling it off (or PS4Pro/Xbonex for few titles that support 4k), else you'll be a sad 4k display owner.
Also movies still can't make a jump to true 4k - most of UltraHD blurays are in fact upscaled 2k source.
>>
File: 1498297012985.jpg (267KB, 756x644px) Image search: [Google]
1498297012985.jpg
267KB, 756x644px
>>383274962
Everything is OK until sonyfags arrive.
>>
File: 1iC2OHR.png (245KB, 360x480px) Image search: [Google]
1iC2OHR.png
245KB, 360x480px
>>383281263
Bitch I was on ibiza last week getting my dick sucked by a slut while you complain about people discussing videogames on a videogame subreddit on a yugoslavian mass grave board.
>>
>>383281476
Yeah, so is putting a 1080p display on a cellphone, amirite?
>>
>>383281535
It does though, why aren't you showing the same location?
>>
File: 1499470632969.jpg (302KB, 784x720px) Image search: [Google]
1499470632969.jpg
302KB, 784x720px
>>383281586
It looks like a CGI movie where each frame takes weeks to render on a render farm?
That is quite the praise.
>>
>>383281659
What I'm getting at is that there is a proper size for viewing distance and room size, even with a 4k display.
>>
>>383281659
Not him, but anything higher pixel density that iPhone 6/7 is pointless (750 x 1334), and large as brick phones are dumb.
>>
>>383281610
Anon, please, they'll be ready in 10 minutes, just go back to running through the pretty forests!

Anon, I keep telling you, you need to go OUTS-... sorry! To do those things.

And, even if you do! Bragging about "getting your dick sucked by a slut" is not only demeaning to women (I say this as a rampant non-feminist) but also makes you look like a massive dickhole for thinking that's some sort of supreme accomplishment! I suggest you get your priorities in ord-.. Oh! The tendies are ready!
>>
>>383281543
What model do you own?
>>
>>383281952
you might need to get your eyes checked. I can definitely tell the difference between my iphone 6 and when I upgraded to a 1440p phone.
>>
>thread is okay until sonygers show up and start shitposting
Typical.
>>
File: BDM3275UP_00-IMS-en_GB[1].jpg (127KB, 1250x928px) Image search: [Google]
BDM3275UP_00-IMS-en_GB[1].jpg
127KB, 1250x928px
>>383282246
Philips BDM3275
http://www.philips.co.uk/c-p/BDM3275UP_00/brilliance-4k-ultra-hd-lcd-display-with-multiview
it's a good one and it wasn't insanely expensive back in 2015, but I accidentally damaged it and now have a cluster of 3-5 dead pixels. Welp, that calls for an upgrade to HDR, looking forward Asus ProArt right now since noone seems to have announced 144hz Gsync 32'' HDR displays.
>>
File: 20170709005924_1.jpg (895KB, 3440x1440px) Image search: [Google]
20170709005924_1.jpg
895KB, 3440x1440px
>>
>>383282028
What the fuck was his problem?
>>
>>383282246
Oh, you probably meant the GPU, my bad. 980TI, it's a monster considering it can still play new titles at max settings at 4k, although it shows its age - many games I have to play in upscaled 1440p. Still impressive for a single GPU card. 1080TI apparently can play almost any title at max 4k@60fps right now.
>>
File: lel.gif (2MB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]
lel.gif
2MB, 400x225px
>>383268232
Good bait.
>>
File: 1416297327928.jpg (285KB, 1920x1018px) Image search: [Google]
1416297327928.jpg
285KB, 1920x1018px
>>
Nobody has replied, what game is in OP's screenshots? Or it is a tech demo/benchmark/renders?
>>
>>383281936
So it's a bad thing to have a monitor where one can still see individual pixels at 4k, compared to a TV where you can't make them out because you sit far away from it?
By that logic you arrive to the conclusion that the pixel density of 4k is not for pc monitors, good job.
>>
>>383272797
>little to no physics
>static enviroment
>>
>>383283557
>no day-nigh cycle so its static baked lighting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGyaR2sSBkA
>>
File: staticenvironment.webm (3MB, 854x480px) Image search: [Google]
staticenvironment.webm
3MB, 854x480px
>>383283557
>little to no physics
>static enviroment
nice meme

>>383283431
Battlefield 1
>>
>>383266581
>HURRR GRAFIX IS EVERYTHING
>>
>>383283431
Battlefield 1
>>
File: desert2.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
desert2.jpg
2MB, 3840x2160px
DICE are the absolutely undisputed kings of grafics
>>
File: night2.jpg (4MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
night2.jpg
4MB, 3840x2160px
>>383284658
just look at those rocks, without the playermodel and guns I'd mistake it for a photo
>>
File: endor1mblimit.jpg (4MB, 3800x2137px) Image search: [Google]
endor1mblimit.jpg
4MB, 3800x2137px
>>
>>383284346
I think he was talking about the ground, not the plants. So yes there are no physics to for the ground and it is static.
>>
>>383284797
It's easy to look good when you are a scanned object.
>>
File: desert2.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
desert2.jpg
2MB, 3840x2160px
>>
File: bXc8gM6.jpg (1MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]
bXc8gM6.jpg
1MB, 2560x1440px
>>383284935
Then how does Battlefield look so good?
>>
>>383283453
Apologies...What I really meant was that there's a "sweet spot" for when the pixels are no longer discernible by your eye based on distance between where your are sitting and the display.
>>
>>383282672
>Fallout 4

Fuck you, Todd, not in a million years will your shitty game be considered for good graphics
>>
File: Backtracking.jpg (380KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Backtracking.jpg
380KB, 1920x1080px
So glad I upgraded my toaster and monitor, DOOM turned out to be a lot of fun.

Some parts of it reminds me of LV-426 in Aliens.
>>
File: terrible post.png (272KB, 435x462px) Image search: [Google]
terrible post.png
272KB, 435x462px
>>383285325
It doesn't.
>>
File: gtav_32999984194_o.jpg (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]
gtav_32999984194_o.jpg
2MB, 2560x1440px
>>
>>383286242
Not him, but don't you dare use two of my heroes to shitpost!
>>
>>383286353
shit textures
>>
File: gtav_32999988254_o.jpg (1MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]
gtav_32999988254_o.jpg
1MB, 2560x1440px
>>
>>383286365
>zrumpf
>pooptin
>heroes
>>
File: Dead_Space4.jpg (393KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Dead_Space4.jpg
393KB, 1920x1080px
I'm just getting tired of LE EBUL PSEUDO-CHRISTIAN SPESS CULT XD meme in games.

It's not edgy, it's tired and lazy.
>>
File: gtav_33000439684_o.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
gtav_33000439684_o.jpg
3MB, 3840x2160px
>>
>>383286480
Pretty photo-realistic to me, looks like any run of the mill libtard shit hole.
>>
File: fallout-new-vegas_23101992106_o.jpg (655KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
fallout-new-vegas_23101992106_o.jpg
655KB, 1920x1080px
>>
File: Multi-dong_Spingun.jpg (384KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Multi-dong_Spingun.jpg
384KB, 1920x1080px
>>
File: 1499539128637.png (658KB, 744x882px) Image search: [Google]
1499539128637.png
658KB, 744x882px
>>383275708
you upset kid
>>
File: NewCar.jpg (449KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
NewCar.jpg
449KB, 1920x1080px
Playing this is also making me wish they'd remake Red Faction in this engine.
>>
>>383284029
I'm actually kinda excited for battlefront 2. I hope they do a good job with the campaign. And plus points if they put in a skirmish mode against bots.
>>
File: BFG9000.jpg (367KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
BFG9000.jpg
367KB, 1920x1080px
>>
>>383278874
what gaem ?
>>
File: game2.webm (3MB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]
game2.webm
3MB, 640x480px
Crackdown looks good
>>
>>383287637

Clearly Deus Ex: We Wuz Augs
>>
>>383275746
nice mapping for a 3ds game
>>
File: 20170223172655_1.jpg (352KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
20170223172655_1.jpg
352KB, 1920x1080px
I hope the sequel adds more monsters, like a fuckload
>>
File: 1.png (4MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
1.png
4MB, 1920x1080px
Are measly 1080p screens allowed?
>>
>>383288507
i'd like the sequel to be a lot of short story with something like 4 5h long story
>>
File: 1499093271431.png (198KB, 550x535px) Image search: [Google]
1499093271431.png
198KB, 550x535px
>>383288507
>chromantic abomination
>>
>>383288507

I would have played this if I weren't so easily scared. That bug woman was repulsive.
>>
>>383288849
Yeah, but HUDs are maximum pleb tier
>>
>>383268232
You can't even compare those game to Crysis.
Those are just static high resolution textures, aka photographs.
Environment in Crysis was dynamic.
>but destruction 5.0
Shit.
>>
File: 1490826508569.jpg (239KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
1490826508569.jpg
239KB, 1920x1080px
>only the best graphics
>people post consoles games
looks fuckos
PC games look better and perform better for the money
the only good thing about consoles is exclusives and thats literally it
stop ruining these threads
pic related how your games look
>>
>>383289186
>posts frog with chromatic aberration
>>
>>383289239
Never bothered to take screenshots until now. I'll try to improve.
>>
>>383289293
Poor fag is mad he can't run bf1.
>>
>>383289334
Jesus christ that water. Why is the sun reflection just a circle?
>>
>>383290146

You better be samefagging your own shitpost and not legitimately a retard falling for bait.
>>
>>383289186
I think it's okay for a horror game, but for action games it's intolerable and yes I know it gets action like near the end, but I didn't even notice any chromatic aberration
>>
>>383289334
so this...
is the power...
of ps4....
>>
File: Untitled.png (61KB, 757x634px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
61KB, 757x634px
>>383290368
Buzzwords much? Why are you so mad about that screenshot?
>>
>>383289334
wooowwwww you're hilariously mad
>>
>>383291663
console games belong in a screenshot thread
this is a graphics thread where op indicated "only the best graphics"
>>
>>383291663
Care to show him up with your own screen shot? Or is "lol I've indicated you're upset so I win" your only response?
>>
File: rm.jpg (27KB, 325x289px) Image search: [Google]
rm.jpg
27KB, 325x289px
My man!
>>
>>383287987
Wow, I actually must've missed that somehow during E3.
That looks like total shit did they not update their engine at all since 2?
>>
File: 1491050930105.gif (1MB, 350x191px) Image search: [Google]
1491050930105.gif
1MB, 350x191px
>>383274962
>>383275304
>>
>>383281648
>that fucking bloom
>>
File: 1497585505343.jpg (14KB, 340x320px) Image search: [Google]
1497585505343.jpg
14KB, 340x320px
>tfw finally upgraded my graphics card so I can play modern games with no fps drops
if I haven't been awake 30 hours straight I would be jumping with joy
>>
File: 1474645196336.jpg (13KB, 247x206px) Image search: [Google]
1474645196336.jpg
13KB, 247x206px
>>383274962
Perfection
>>
File: 1484414631329.jpg (32KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]
1484414631329.jpg
32KB, 500x333px
>>383275756
>>
>>383293150
>Swedish Chef
everything adds up
>>
>>383272408
why does my paragon game look so blurry and with such shitty aa?
>>
>>383282672
The graphics in this game are okay, I mean compared to games in the early 2000s they are quite good, but the HUD really shits on them, I always thought. It's so ugly.
>>
>>383282672
>shadows: off
>>
>>383275756
kek
all those butthurt dislikes
>>
>>383295149
Doesn't even compare
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVPXKdSEGNQ
>>
>>383281263
>WAHH WAHH STOP ENJOYING THINGS I DON'T LIKE WAHHHHH!!!!!
fuck off
>>
>>383295409
>that butthurt post
>>
>>383295643
okay
>>
File: 20170507002555_1.jpg (985KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
20170507002555_1.jpg
985KB, 3840x2160px
Not gonna lie, BF1 is fucking gorgeous.
Doom's pretty up their too.
>>
>>383295643
They're both butthurt posts, except ones a comparison and one is a meme
>>
>>383295948
Indeed, but you're a faggot for not disabling all that shit on screen
>>
what other games beside doom and bf1 can I enjoy on my 144hz monitor? So very good graphics, very good optimized and fast paced game
>>
>>383282028
what did he mean by this?
>>
File: prettyquake1.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
prettyquake1.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
>>383296203
>>
>>383296132
Prepare to be triggered.
>>
>>383296425
I'm triggered by all those buildings in the distance not casting any shadows
>>
File: re7 2017-01-30 21-06-56-11.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
re7 2017-01-30 21-06-56-11.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
>>
>>383296712
But they're in shadow
>>
>>383296425
>Woa! He's fast!
>>
File: 32.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
32.png
3MB, 1920x1080px
hope they make horizon 4 in japan, it'd look so nice
>>
File: 20170708_165342.jpg (128KB, 576x576px) Image search: [Google]
20170708_165342.jpg
128KB, 576x576px
>>383274962
Cropped it to use as a reaction image. Feel free to proliferate the fuck outta it.
>>
>>383275987
>Names three Electronic Arts games.
>This nigger literally bought three Electronic Arts games.
>He shares a board with us.

>>>/Reddit/
>>
>>
>>383297313
>TRUMP20

yikes
>>
>>383296137
bump
>>
>>383272556
That looks like a cool scenario. Is that a moving robot? Or just a structure? I'm sure it's a setpiece regardless but it looks interesting.
>>
>>383296137
Max payne 3
>>
>>383298367
Battlefront, Dota 2, CSGO are games which I can easily push at 144fps and high settings

>inb4 shit taste
>>
>>383298861
i play lol wont try dota
csgo is paid so i want things i can pirate
does battlefront have a solo campaign?
>>
>>383299105
Learn to google dumbass
>>
File: wew.png (4MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
wew.png
4MB, 1920x1080px
>>383298261
epic!
>>
>>383299690
fuck off
>>
>>383297313
>>383299747
So did you stop playing the game since you made this batch of shitshots that you post in every thread?
>>
is forza any good or just bland
still dont think i want anything to do with w10 store tho
>>
File: order4.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
order4.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
>>383300741
>being this mad bcs his pc cant run the game

kek
>>
>>383282672
>>383286094
Still annoyed that FO4 had significantly higher requirements despite looking marginally (if at all) better than Skyrim or FO3. I'm okay with higher system requirements (progress, and all that) as long as there are results to show for it.
>>
>>383283394
Game?
>>
File: DOOMx64 2016-05-21 03-38-14-78.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
DOOMx64 2016-05-21 03-38-14-78.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
>>383301535
There is nothing impressive about this blurry mess of a game, stop posting it.
>>
File: TheOrder_1886_20150219160209.jpg (289KB, 1920x800px) Image search: [Google]
TheOrder_1886_20150219160209.jpg
289KB, 1920x800px
>>383303018
>mad he doesn't own a ps4
Your pic looks like shit
>>
>>383303018

While D44M is a prime example of less is more that is hardly the best level to choose to showcase the game.

>>383303309

Why does this picture have a vaseline filter?
>>
>>383275740
The game would look much better if they didn't go for that bland anime color pallete.
>>
File: The Order_ 1886_20170705021249.png (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
The Order_ 1886_20170705021249.png
2MB, 3840x2160px
>>383303018
Looks better than DOOM lol

IdTech will forever be a shit engine
>>
File: 1471830627828.jpg (343KB, 1920x800px) Image search: [Google]
1471830627828.jpg
343KB, 1920x800px
>>383303438
It's called compression kid
>>
File: ut4.jpg (3MB, 5430x3054px) Image search: [Google]
ut4.jpg
3MB, 5430x3054px
>>383303531
>>
File: iv5-7Z.gif (1MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]
iv5-7Z.gif
1MB, 320x240px
>>383266581
>no Crysis, molded morrowind, or modded gothic 2 shitposts
Is this now considered new neo-/v/ or what
>>
>>383303628

>It's called compression kid

No its called upscaling because the game runs at resolutions best suited to 2007.
>>
File: yUob.jpg (304KB, 1920x800px) Image search: [Google]
yUob.jpg
304KB, 1920x800px
>>383303679
>Actual resolution is 720p
A lie

>>383303887
Actually it's native 1920x800 retard, not upscaled.
>>
>>383284797
the blown out cyan sky looks stpid though.
>>
>>383304219


>Actually it's native 1920x800 retard, not upscaled.

Oh, so its not even 2007 resolution but worse?
>>
File: The Order_ 1886_20170703015053.png (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
The Order_ 1886_20170703015053.png
3MB, 3840x2160px
>>383303679
>small af map with literally no details
>WOW LOOK AT THE RESOLUTION
>>
>>383289334
What outfit is that? Is it from the dlc?
>>
>>383305245

Evil within looks better.
>>
>>383305245
Thats some fucked aliasing you got there. And that shirt looks straight out of a 2009 game.
>>
File: The Order_ 1886_20170703125514.png (4MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
The Order_ 1886_20170703125514.png
4MB, 3840x2160px
>>383305530
Hahaha no it doesn't dumbass

>>383306276
well those are sacrificies i have to live with on my ps protato, still looks good
>>
>>383266581
Why does Battlefield look less realistic than Battlefront?
>>
>>383306769
Filters
>>
>>383305245
You realize that that too is just a skybox in your picture?
>>
>>383306276
Aliasing is invisible unless zooming in, which is what you did you sad fuck
>>
>the blurry order
>>
File: Gravity is only for the living.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Gravity is only for the living.png
3MB, 1920x1080px
>>
>>383306984
nope, that ship in the background for example is moving :)

anyway Forza 7 will be the best looking game once its out
>>
>>383307028
>my eyes are shit so your eyes must also be shit
Take a look again, the aliasing is very obvious on the cranes as well as the strap.
>>
>>383308134
I have perfect vision, you're just lying retard.
>>
File: 22713523538_760280372a_o.jpg (1MB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]
22713523538_760280372a_o.jpg
1MB, 1920x1200px
>>
>>383308990

>not pictured: the 20fps it runs on even on modern hardware

I do love crysis but getting it to run on modern 64bit system AND at a good framerate equires sorcery as the game is so murderous on the cpu (given hitting 2 threads was the pinnacle of multi-threading at the time) no chip exists to feed it fast enough.
>>
>>383307387
>nope, that ship in the background for example is moving :)

once again you prove that you don't know what the fuck you are talking about, gratz

Will you ever stop shitting up graphics threads with the Order 1886? The game is blurry, level design is uninteresting, EVERYTHING is grey, there is nothing impressive about it
If you are baiting, gratz, you got me mad, atleast post HZD but not that fucking turd of a game
>>
>>383309702

>That screenshot

You know, that game really would benefit from HDR. It should go without saying that Mirror's Edge - even with its pre-baked lighting - is the one game that would showcase HDR.
>>
>>383310186

Fuck HDR, though.
>>
>>383310347

HDR is the future for display panels because 8bit displays have been crippling art direction for over a decade. The only other area that needs that next gen sauce moreso is audio - even when AMD was (and is) baking in dedicated silicon just for audio management into their gpus it goes unloved. Directional audio is a huge thing for immersion but is so badly ignored by way too many developers.
>>
File: Grand Theft Auto V.jpg (568KB, 2560x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Grand Theft Auto V.jpg
568KB, 2560x1080px
Thank god openIV is back
>>
File: Far Cry Primal.jpg (1MB, 2560x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Far Cry Primal.jpg
1MB, 2560x1080px
>>
File: 1417686091699.jpg (196KB, 1366x706px) Image search: [Google]
1417686091699.jpg
196KB, 1366x706px
>>383302181
>"game"
Space engine.
>>
File: CsrSoBsUEAA2Wje.jpg (124KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
CsrSoBsUEAA2Wje.jpg
124KB, 1920x1080px
>>
File: Endurance race silverstone.jpg (256KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Endurance race silverstone.jpg
256KB, 1920x1080px
>>
File: 1416408316169.png (967KB, 1360x768px) Image search: [Google]
1416408316169.png
967KB, 1360x768px
>>383309335
t. i never had a good CPU.
>>
File: 1464476398431.jpg (11KB, 297x275px) Image search: [Google]
1464476398431.jpg
11KB, 297x275px
>>383274962
>photomode
>>
>>383312016

If you look at any modern benchmark of the game you'll see horrendous minimuns even on hardware orders of magnitude faster than what was available when the game was released. I'm not deriding the technical marvel the game is buit it slams into software limitations that nobody had a way to overcome in 2007.
>>
>>383311942
PCARS LOOKS LIKE SHIT

cantr compete with gran turismo and forza
>>
>>383266581
>>383266657
>>383266789
>>383266891
>>383267027
>>383267151
>>383267281
>>383267418
>>383267540
>>383267679
>>383267787
>>383267875
Today we mention what battlefield 4 did better than battlefield 1
>Unpinning grenades before throwing
>Gunplay
>More vehicles
>More weapons
>better weapon customization
>character skins
>Weapon balancing
>properly scheduled dlc
>Bigger maps
>Better UI
>actual progression
>>
>>383308990
>>383312425
You must have absolutely garbage hardware
>>
F L A T
A N D R O I D
A S S E S
>>
File: 35212144395_26a8a357d3_o.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
35212144395_26a8a357d3_o.png
3MB, 1920x1080px
1886-kun i agree that it has some of the best post-effects and one of the most convincing PBR shaders in the industry. But can you agree that Horizon is more impressive with its huge open world while retaining the great PBR?
>>
File: 20170708115140_1.jpg (293KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
20170708115140_1.jpg
293KB, 1920x1080px
>>
>>
>>383313317
But Horizon doesn't retain the great PBR.
In fact, Horizon has some of the worst foliage shading I've seen in a modern game outside of maybe Far Cry 4.
>>
>>383314812
You're literally just making things up now
>>
File: horizonzerodawn_20170g2s1x.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
horizonzerodawn_20170g2s1x.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
>>383314812
Gonna have to say you are wrong on that one.
>>
>>383314934
People who think Horizon has good shading are people who don't actually go outside.
The Order 1886 is leagues ahead of that game.
>>
>>383314812
>In fact, Horizon has some of the worst foliage shading I've seen in a modern game outside of maybe Far Cry 4.
Kill yourself.
>>
File: 1490962490484.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
1490962490484.jpg
1MB, 1920x1080px
>>383315047
Like this for example, if you think that's what grass or trees look like on a moonlit night, you don't actually go outside.
Pic related is easily the pinnacle of foliage rendering in video games, but aside from this, the closest games are Battlefield 1, Battlefront, and MAYBE a select few others.
>>
>>383315057
lol ok pal, sounds like maybe you need to take a trip outside
>>
>>383271897
perfect
>>
>>383314738

>patched to reduce view distance by half

To be fair once you remove the chromatic aberration the game does indeed look pretty good but the inclusion of physix did the game no favours for performance.
>>
>>383303478
that's the most retarded thing i've ever read in my entire life
>>
File: 35679222256_213703670d_o.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
35679222256_213703670d_o.png
3MB, 1920x1080px
>>383315214
You have never seen BBC documentaries have you?
>>
File: 82926833.jpg (691KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
82926833.jpg
691KB, 3840x2160px
>>383266581
>>
>>383315214
And to expand on this, another game that grinds my gears in this regard is Arkham Knight.
The game itself looks mediocre outside of character models, and just fills the screen with enough filters to blind you.
Does it look good for an UE3 game?
Sure, easily the best-looking UE3 game on the market.
Hell, I don't even think it's a particularly bad-looking game, but it's the equivalent of BF3 in its abuse of filters in place of actual high-quality visuals.

>>383315778
Is that your argument in place of actual going outside or are you baiting me?
>>
>>383274962

>30 fps gameplay

No thanks.
>>
>>383311282
what mod?
>>
File: eLjZ447.jpg (371KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
eLjZ447.jpg
371KB, 1920x1080px
>>383315868
>Is that your argument in place of actual going outside or are you baiting me?
Your argument is that it has to look dull like reality. Why not have your game look like those BBC documentaries that are shot in full moon during the 25 minutes where everything looks perfect and artistic?
You know. Those shots that they wait 6 months for so that the climate and the vegetation has the correct density to truely shine in the moonlight?

Why do you want Horizon to look like your average realistic picture when you could have it look a lot better.
>>
>>383268428
>I did

You did what?
>>
File: inc7B9snXZcC5.jpg (651KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
inc7B9snXZcC5.jpg
651KB, 1920x1080px
>>383316265
>Why not have your game look like those BBC documentaries that are shot in full moon during the 25 minutes where everything looks perfect and artistic?
What the hell are you talking about? Even those shots look nothing like the screenshot in >>383315047, or the screenshot you just posted.
Horizon's actual foliage shading doesn't actually look like foliage in real life under any lighting conditions, it has a distinctly plastic/clay look to it, similar to Far Cry games and the like.
You can have a game that emulates those naturally beautiful moments without looking like plastic, The Order 1886 emulates a lot of materials very well without looking like plastic/clay, Horizon Zero Dawn doesn't do so nearly as well, but its foliage stands out as the worst offender.
Frankly, it's not even the best-looking open world game on the PS4.
>>
>>383315945
>fps meme

got him good bro
*tips fedora*
>>
>>383314738
Walt?
>>
>>383316694
What a pathetic, miserable existence you must have to so desperately fabricate things to dislike
>>
>>383298235
Not gonna lie, that water looks amazingly good.
>>
>Came for graphics
>another thread derailed by console wars
videogame culture was a mistake
>>
File: 1358897626020.png (548KB, 696x462px) Image search: [Google]
1358897626020.png
548KB, 696x462px
>>383316826
>Ad hominem
Lemme just dig into my smug loli folder for a second.
>>
File: image.jpg (90KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
90KB, 1024x576px
>>383266581
>>
>>383316870
It's all the FPS and fake jargon spouting PCfats, and a couple toddlers. Everyone else is having a perfectly fine conversation
>>
>>383316870
It's just drones being angry because they have nothing to post in these threads, and this is, after all /v/ - Shitendo.
>>
>>383271427
i like halo guy. eh fights aliens and doesn't afraid of anything.
>>
>>383316938
>anime folder

Not helping your case there, tubby
>>
File: 1471035110780.gif (3MB, 483x400px) Image search: [Google]
1471035110780.gif
3MB, 483x400px
>>383316714
>30 fps in 2017
>>
>>383312663
BF4 has also been out for like 3.5 years now and had a shitload of additional content added on after the season pass ran out.
>>
File: 1355019337158.png (418KB, 852x371px) Image search: [Google]
1355019337158.png
418KB, 852x371px
>>383317120
>>
>>383317159
literally LMFAOing at your life right now
>>
File: 1356857295123.jpg (563KB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]
1356857295123.jpg
563KB, 1440x900px
>>383317234
>>
File: 1473339665090.jpg (27KB, 600x418px) Image search: [Google]
1473339665090.jpg
27KB, 600x418px
>>383317026
>>383317054
>complain about console wars
>get 2 console warriors blaming the other for the shitposting
just stop
stop
>>
File: 34915167260_c8bb1f83c2_o.png (3MB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]
34915167260_c8bb1f83c2_o.png
3MB, 1440x1080px
>>383316694
Welp. It is certain that you need glasses.
>>
>>383317495
Now this is a good example, unfortunately the others you posted are not.
>>
>>383284797
Technically, it kinda is.
Look up photogrammetry.
>>
File: 1489163326936.jpg (522KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]
1489163326936.jpg
522KB, 2048x1152px
>>383317660
>>383317495
Shame the gameplay doesn't look that good.
Photomode need not apply.
>>
File: Misty Peaks.webm (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
Misty Peaks.webm
1MB, 1280x720px
>>
>>383317660
>If it has sss it looks bad because i say so
No you are just flat out wrong.
>>
>>383318324
>I don't know how SSS works but I think it being present = good graphics
>>
File: photomodevsnonphotomode.jpg (3MB, 3072x3456px) Image search: [Google]
photomodevsnonphotomode.jpg
3MB, 3072x3456px
>>383317885
Photomode doesn't do anything.
>>383318468
>I don't know how SSS works so i think it looks unrealistic
You do know that the SSS is a side of their lighting engine just like it is in real life right?
Do you know why plastic is used in real life to portray vegetation? Because it looks the most accurate.
The only reason you don't like the vegetation in Horizon is because you don't like SSS for no good reason.
You just think it look unrealistic because you have never seen it be truely potent in real life.
>>
File: 20170708192602_1.jpg (304KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
20170708192602_1.jpg
304KB, 1920x1080px
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (369KB, 4096x2540px) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault.jpg
369KB, 4096x2540px
>>383319403
>that pose
>>
File: IMG_20150715_172957.jpg (4MB, 3328x2496px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20150715_172957.jpg
4MB, 3328x2496px
>>383319403
>>I don't know how SSS works so i think it looks unrealistic
Actually, that's the exact opposite reason why I think >>383315047 looks unrealistic.
Actual leaves on an actual tree don't look like that when illuminated by the moon, nor does the grass in that screenshot.
>Do you know why plastic is used in real life to portray vegetation? Because it looks the most accurate.
No it doesn't, leaves don't look like plastic, does pic related look like plastic to you?
>The only reason you don't like the vegetation in Horizon is because you don't like SSS for no good reason.
Nigger, you clearly don't know how SSS works, >>383315214 makes 100% proper use of SSS, in addition to proper diffuse lighting and even proper shading as it relates to the actual foliage, nevermind the sheer density.
There is no other game that comes close to that, aside from maybe Battlefront/BF1.
And that's a pretty big maybe.
>>
File: 20170708192653_1.jpg (401KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
20170708192653_1.jpg
401KB, 1920x1080px
>>
>>383319403
Photomode with no filters enabled
Kek, nah senpai, I'm not dumb enough to fall for that.
If you're gonna praise a game, in-game graphics only, no photo mode with a ton of filters enabled with tons of digital up-touching that you found on flickr.
>>
>>383275519
you can shoot down every fucking tree in crysis
>>
File: Pedal to the metal.webm (3MB, 720x405px) Image search: [Google]
Pedal to the metal.webm
3MB, 720x405px
/r/ Wipeout HD screenshots.
>>
File: 34372392453_0d855c1af2_o.jpg (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
34372392453_0d855c1af2_o.jpg
2MB, 1920x1080px
>>383319818
You are just forcing your opinion onto what looks the best.
It depends on the camera shutter how the SSS looks.
You are objectively wrong in what you are saying.
>>
>>383320647
>It depends on the camera shutter how the SSS looks.
Okay, so you don't know what SSS actually is, at least admit that before posting for half an hour and embarrassing yourself.
>>
>>383287987
this looks comically awful and unfun
>>
>>383287987
Still can't believe they fucking gutted the destruction that was originally in this game.
I blame the shit CPU in these consoles.
Power of the cloud my asshole.
>>
>>383321523
they didn't, it's just multiplayer-only and the singleplayer literally has no destruction whatsoever.

the destruction looked fucking terrible anyway, they were relying on it as a gimmick and forgot to make anything else in the game look decent, let alone fun.
>>
>>383321865
>it's just multiplayer-only
Have they shown any multiplayer?
>>
File: biking-skills.jpg (367KB, 1920x1103px) Image search: [Google]
biking-skills.jpg
367KB, 1920x1103px
>>383320737
According to you, pic related isn't real right?
>>
>>383321979
Why does this look like you captured it from a 480p Youtube video?
>>
>>383321865
>the destruction looked fucking terrible anyway
Are you retarded? It looked fucking great
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWANLy9TjRc
>>
>>383322331
Why are you role playing? All he wants is screenshots without photomode, why is that literally impossible for horizon fans to do?
>>
File: 1468071293254.gif (622KB, 480x304px) Image search: [Google]
1468071293254.gif
622KB, 480x304px
>>383322331
>>
>>383322126
>Whole argument shattered
>"T-t-the quality!!"
pathetic.
>>
File: 1489614486400.jpg (1012KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
1489614486400.jpg
1012KB, 3840x2160px
>>383322873
Because they have a bad habit of lying.
It's typical with console gamers, except for Nintendofags, since their games don't have photo modes.
>>
>>383323032
>>Whole argument shattered
???
Where?
That picture doesn't refute any portion of my argument, especially considering the sun is literally millions of times brighter than the moon.
>>
>>383322331
>*action*
Back to plebbit
>>
>>383322331
kill yourself
>>
>>383322873
>>383323087
>>
>>383322331
kek you fucking wrecked that wanker
>>
File: 1489615138714.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
1489615138714.jpg
1MB, 3840x2160px
>>383323442
>Ugly ground textures
Kek, my sides.
>>
File: 35016777852_214b0609c9_o.jpg (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
35016777852_214b0609c9_o.jpg
2MB, 1920x1080px
>>383323252
Yes it proves that SSS in real life looks EXACTLY the same as it does in Horizon. You just don't like the aesthetic for your own personal reasons.
>>
File: test3.5.jpg (3MB, 7034x1920px) Image search: [Google]
test3.5.jpg
3MB, 7034x1920px
>>
File: IMG_20150715_172924.jpg (3MB, 3744x2808px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20150715_172924.jpg
3MB, 3744x2808px
>>383323631
>Yes it proves that SSS in real life looks EXACTLY the same as it does in Horizon.
Nigger, you posted a 480p picture of the sun shining through grass as a way to say that it looks like the moon in a game shining through grass that looks like plastic in a video game.
That doesn't prove anything, aside from your own retardation since, again, you don't go outside.
>>
>>383282672
the most visually impressive thing about fallout 4 is the skybox. It had a really awkward clash of realistic and cartoony art styles that it ends up looking pretty bad as a result, it'd be like adding really detailed cloth textures to team fortress 2 or some dumb shit like that
>>
why do you idiots get so mad when they post those games
>>
>>383323868
woooooooooooowwwwwwwww you're STILL this buttblasted that your shitty opinion is wrong
>>
>>383323868
That image you just posted doesn't show SSS. It just shows direct lighting.
If we saw the leaves from the other side. ie. the sun shining through the leaves then you would have a leg to stand on. But you don't have it.

Amazing how that image you posted is literal PROOF you don't know how SSS works. I don't think you could find a picture where it is harder to see SSS than that image right there.
>>
>>383324161
>That image you just posted doesn't show SSS. It just shows direct lighting.
That image wasn't posted as an example of SSS you moron, it's just an image showing actual foliage that isn't 480p.
You're the dumbfuck who thinks foliage being illuminated by the moon on planet Earth exhibiting the same properties as foliage being illuminated by the sun is the same thing.
>>
>>383324161
Actually, that image does show SSS, do you think light just stops after illuminating a single translucent surface?
Notice how the forested area is darker than the non-forested area thanks to the "diffuse lighting" resulting in a less illuminated area.
Something that's done poorly in Horizon, pic related.
In fact, a lot of the aspects in Horizon are poorly-done, especially the LoD, and ESPECIALLY for textures.
>>
File: Bodies.jpg.jpg (3MB, 3840x2178px) Image search: [Google]
Bodies.jpg.jpg
3MB, 3840x2178px
>>383324613
Huh, weird, it didn't post the image.
>>
>>383324613
>Actually, that image does show SSS
Not him but it doesn't, retard. Learn what SSS is.
>>
2009 btw
>>
File: 1470500975597.png (637KB, 849x565px) Image search: [Google]
1470500975597.png
637KB, 849x565px
>horizonfag gets BTFO and proceeds to shitpost
Getting really tired of this.
>>
>>383325139
You realize you're shitposting as well right now
>>
>>383324839
All SSS is is light being scattered through a somewhat translucent object. Once it penetrates said object it still comes out the other side, only from a different angle/area, ergo when light has to penetrate multiple leaves, it results in weaker light and less penetration, creating dark spots beneath heavily-forested areas, but not VERY dark spots with speckles of light, as seen in >>383324697.
It's shown better in the other picture he posted where some areas covered by more leaves closer to the ground are darker than other areas.
>>
File: 35399460151_eca8860ef8_o.jpg (3MB, 2800x1200px) Image search: [Google]
35399460151_eca8860ef8_o.jpg
3MB, 2800x1200px
>>383324341
>480p
As you can see it is very clearly at least 1080p >>383321979
>1920x1103
All i was proving is that depending on the shutter you can see the SSS way more clearly than your SHIT fucking images.
Stop hating on an artstyle and using arguments that are false. At this point if you continue, you are nothing but a liar.
>Sun and moon differences
You know that when it is night in horizon they turn up the light so that you can see in the dark right? You know this right?
>>383324613
You are being stupid on purpose. Kill yourself. That image was not meant to show off SSS.
>>
>>383325461
>As you can see it is very clearly at least 1080p
It's not actually, in fact, I'm led to believe that it's a blown up version of a thumbnail since it's extremely blurry and the only other version I can find from Google is the thumbnail version.
>All i was proving is that depending on the shutter you can see the SSS way more clearly than your SHIT fucking images.
That doesn't prove any of that though, you just posted a shitty, blurry image that's during the day.
>You know that when it is night in horizon they turn up the light so that you can see in the dark right? You know this right?
So in other words they use unrealistic lighting.
Sorry anon, Horizon Zero Dawn has very inaccurate shading, which, again, is about on par with Far Cry 4's, which results in some outdated-looking shading, and is also why people like you refuse to post gameplay screenshots of it.
>>
File: div (20).jpg (3MB, 3820x2488px) Image search: [Google]
div (20).jpg
3MB, 3820x2488px
>>
>>383326167
I want a game with these visuals that doesn't end up being shit.
>>
File: 34372330213_98b7ae85a3_o.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
34372330213_98b7ae85a3_o.jpg
1MB, 1920x1080px
>>383325752
>So in other words they use unrealistic lighting.
No they just let the camera accept more lighting. Would you call what cats see at night unrealistic lighting?
>Sorry anon, Horizon Zero Dawn has very inaccurate shading
Flat out inaccurate. It has the same shading as they used for the Death Stranding Mads Mikkelsen trailer. Best in the industry.
>which, again, is about on par with Far Cry 4's, which results in some outdated-looking shading
Care to post proof of this maybe?
>and is also why people like you refuse to post gameplay screenshots of it.
What? I have been posting throughout this thread.
>>
>>383326167
Holy shit, now that's photorealism. I had to double check that shit.
>>
File: div (14).jpg (3MB, 4908x1636px) Image search: [Google]
div (14).jpg
3MB, 4908x1636px
>>
File: div (18).jpg (2MB, 2748x2061px) Image search: [Google]
div (18).jpg
2MB, 2748x2061px
>>
File: autumn aruroa.jpg (834KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]
autumn aruroa.jpg
834KB, 2560x1440px
>>383324887

>not pictured: the million game-breaking bugs

If only Sergei spent more on QA and less on a ferrari.
>>
File: div (7).jpg (1MB, 2958x2366px) Image search: [Google]
div (7).jpg
1MB, 2958x2366px
>>
>>383326354
>No they just let the camera accept more lighting. They also make the moon produce a lot more light than it does, ergo unrealistic.
>It has the same shading as they used for the Death Stranding Mads Mikkelsen trailer. Best in the industry.
Clearly not, as the game doesn't look anywhere near as good as that Death Stranding trailer.
That said, the best shading in the industry award goes to DICE.
>Care to post proof of this maybe?
see
>>383316694
>What? I have been posting throughout this thread.
You've posted a single gameplay shot with the HUD enabled anon, and it was a picture staring at the ground.
I don't need to post a photo mode shot of something like pic related because it actually looks this good in-game.
>>
>>383326505
>>383326167
>>383326371
>Doesn't run in real-time
Why bother?
>>
>>383325752
>it's only good graphics if the screen is completely black at night
>>
>>383279634

Nice fog, where's the floor though?

Behind those low detail trees?
>>
>>383326732
those are from The Division anon, which is actually optimized very well
>>
>>383326167
>>383326505
Those 2 are photorealistic.
>>
File: 1384426511699.jpg (20KB, 230x360px) Image search: [Google]
1384426511699.jpg
20KB, 230x360px
>>383326829
>This game has super-realistic lighting!
>But this aspect isn't realistic
>W-Who cares?!
>>
>>383326730
There's no one in this entire thread that doesn't think you're trolling. You can go to bed now.

I'm really sorry that your nintendo game looks like a cartoon
>>
File: div3.jpg (4MB, 5100x2024px) Image search: [Google]
div3.jpg
4MB, 5100x2024px
>>
File: 35195044735_af03e44962_o.png (4MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
35195044735_af03e44962_o.png
4MB, 1920x1080px
>>383326730
>Clearly not
It quite literally does have the exact same shading as Death Stranding.
>the best shading in the industry award goes to DICE.
Nope. It is a very commonly known thing in the industry that Kojima Productions has the best shading of all games. Released and unreleased.
>see
>>>383316694
You are gonna need a bigger bait.
>You've posted a single gameplay shot with the HUD enabled anon
Photomode doesn't do anything see >>383319403
>>
>>383327028
I don't believe you've ever played video games in your entire life.
>>
File: div (5).jpg (1MB, 3600x2880px) Image search: [Google]
div (5).jpg
1MB, 3600x2880px
>>
File: uc4photomode.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
uc4photomode.jpg
1MB, 3840x2160px
>>383327213
>Photomode doesn't do anything
>>
>>383301535

I wish there was more gameplay to this, especially when they gave you the lighting gun.
>>
File: uc4ingame.jpg (924KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
uc4ingame.jpg
924KB, 3840x2160px
>>383327213
>Photomode doesn't do anything

>>383327379
>>
>>383327379
>posts a different game
>grasping this desperately hard

Who are you even trying to convince?
>>
File: 1496624920563.jpg (13KB, 224x219px) Image search: [Google]
1496624920563.jpg
13KB, 224x219px
>>383266581

Does anyone else feel like playing ac unity again after they see screens of it?

Aside from the 'We're not listening to a noob's suggestions' part of the story and the whole graphics issues at launch it does have a very nice engine, easily the best out of all the ac games
>>
>>383327213
>It quite literally does have the exact same shading as Death Stranding.
Same engine != same shading anon.
>Nope. It is a very commonly known thing in the industry that Kojima Productions has the best shading of all games. Released and unreleased.
Oh god no, none of their games come close to Battlefront.
Fox Engine was impressive, but nowhere near the level of Frostbite.
>You are gonna need a bigger bait.
Excellent argument.
>Photomode doesn't do anything
So post screenshots with the HUD enabled.
You can say that all you want, but it doesn't mean much when you won't post any yourself.
Photomode allows you to adjust all sorts of effects and filters, and no one knows what may or may not be enabled unless it's a screenshot taken without photo mode with the HUD enabled.
So post it.
>>
File: U4 photomode.jpg (4MB, 3840x4320px) Image search: [Google]
U4 photomode.jpg
4MB, 3840x4320px
>>383327379
>>383327502
Nothing but sharpening and vignette.
>>
File: acu_crowdd.jpg (2MB, 4396x1848px) Image search: [Google]
acu_crowdd.jpg
2MB, 4396x1848px
>>383327646
>tfw finally have a PC that can run it stable 1080p60fps
its about time to replay it for me too
>>
All this childish whining about consoles is making me want to fire up my PS4 just to hear more manlet crying.
>>
>>383327650
already happened, in this thread

Next bait please
>>
File: div (17).jpg (3MB, 4160x2880px) Image search: [Google]
div (17).jpg
3MB, 4160x2880px
>>
>>383327920
???
>>
>>383327646
yup its the best AC game ive always said this and it did great things for combat system and mission design as well as multiplayer missions

also the ingame assets are still the best ever made for vidya
>>
>>383328073
Try harder
>>
File: div (11).jpg (3MB, 2944x3000px) Image search: [Google]
div (11).jpg
3MB, 2944x3000px
>>
>>383266581
For amazing graphical games, what is the minimum amount of FPS needed to be called playable? 60?
>>
File: hitman 2017-07-04 10-27-42.jpg (2MB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]
hitman 2017-07-04 10-27-42.jpg
2MB, 1920x1200px
>>
File: [013572].jpg (41KB, 1264x711px) Image search: [Google]
[013572].jpg
41KB, 1264x711px
>>383327379
>Activates sharpening filter
You don't have to activate that. All in all it decreases the quality of the image.
Also why are your 4k images under 2mb in size? Kind of suspect.
see >>383327801
>>383327650
Mental gymnastics the post.
>no one knows what may or may not be enabled unless it's a screenshot taken without photo mode with the HUD enabled.
Please leave your tinfoil hat at the exit.
Also pic related is identical to the death stranding trailer.
I think we are done here.
>>
>>383327261
>Devs worked more on the graphics and the environment than the actual game

Sucks the division died like a dog.
>>
>>383328743
>3d artists code the game
No. That being said The Division sucked.
>>
File: div (9).jpg (2MB, 5120x2048px) Image search: [Google]
div (9).jpg
2MB, 5120x2048px
>>
File: re7_2017_06_15_01_13_42_428.jpg (667KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
re7_2017_06_15_01_13_42_428.jpg
667KB, 3840x2160px
>>383328527
>Please leave your tinfoil hat at the exit.
10/10 argument.
>Also pic related is identical to the death stranding trailer.
No, not really.
So basically, you won't post any in-game screenshots.
Fair enough, it's what I'd expect, the game isn't exactly a looker so I can understand being apprehensive about posting some in-game shots.
Thankfully, some other anon already went through the trouble, and considering how awful they look, I can't say I'm surprised.
>>
>>383328743
They didn't work more, the graphics devs were just better at what they did.
>>
>>383328986
Literally all horizon shots in this thread has been direct captures of the game running in real-time on the PS4.
I just don't save images of the game with the hud on because i don't see many.
see >>383281535
>>
>>383329340
And even on PS4 Pro they look worse than something like >>383327213 or >>383317495, let alone a game like TO1886.
>>
>>383329519
Nope, your wrong fake opinion is wrong
>>
>>383329519
Take an image of the same area as those two images while hud is turned on then. Until then i don't believe you. I know exactly what photomode does and doesn't do as i have been using it extensively so you are going to have to prove it to me.
>>
>>383277251
Doom was awesome, I go a 1080ti and an ultra wide and it was gorgeous.
>>
File: bf1_2016_12_26_01_47_37_012.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
bf1_2016_12_26_01_47_37_012.jpg
3MB, 3840x2160px
>>383329737
But it's not, sorry you can't accept it anon.
>>383329852
But anon, you're the one posting them as examples of good graphics, I want to see some non-photomode screenshots that don't look significantly worse than photomode shots like >>383327213 and >>383317495.
>>
>>383330090
>I want to see some non-photomode screenshots that don't look significantly worse than photomode shots
So what you are saying is you don't know but you assume the worst?
Argueing in bad faith is a waste of time.
>>
>>383326706
Cop is pretty bug free and the most polished of the series
>>
File: arma3_2016_12_09_23_15_19_864.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
arma3_2016_12_09_23_15_19_864.jpg
3MB, 3840x2160px
>>383330262
>So what you are saying is you don't know but you assume the worst?
Mmm, no, I look at other games, something like Batman Arkham Knight or Shadow of Mordor has a photo mode that can drastically change how the game looks depending on how long you're willing to tweak it, the same is true for any game with photo mode.
Ergo, when I see something taken via photomode, while shots taken without photomode don't look nearly as good, I assume that the visuals are propped up using photomode.
I mean, if they're not then it's very simple to just take a regular screenshot and prove me wrong, I don't need to make that assumption with OP's BF1 screenshots because the actual screenshots I see posted of actual gameplay look just as good.
>>
>>383330659
Why are you the arbiter of what types of screenshots are better than others?
The graphics are literally the same, the player just has a chance to take control.
Literally the same graphics.
>>
>>383331049
Uhh no, the graphics are not the same, by that logic we should all post touched up images from photoshop to represent actual visuals.
Or better yet, those stupid little benchmarks/architecture rendering examples, since you can technically "play" them.
>>
>>383331659
Can you look up what the definition of "Video game graphics" are ?
>>
>>383332146
Why would I?
>>
>>383278015
Does this building looks weird to anyone else? The best way I can describe it is that it appears as if someone splashed white out all over it.
>>
>>383332265
Because you just said that the graphics aren't the same.
What tech gets replaced when using photomode?
>>
>>383332765
Do you think games don't use post-process filters outside of photo mode?
Are you baiting me?
Photo mode changes those post-process effects, ergo it changes the graphics.
>>
>>383332886
What effects does it change exactly and how?
>>
>>383272797 They made a GDC about it
Different lod of texture, and photogrammetry.

https://youtu.be/U_WaqCBp9zo?t=23m54s
>>
>>383326369
Seriously? The snow is a dead giveaway. Also the jaggies on almost everything that isn't a car as well as the terrible draw distance.
>>
File: 20170619181302_1.jpg (482KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
20170619181302_1.jpg
482KB, 1920x1080px
Is this considered good graphics?
>>
>>383333365
Anything from DoF injection to changes in tone mapping to changes in color correction.
Most post-FX graphical effects can be altered using photo mode.
>>383333674
A better question is, is it running at higher than 25 FPS?
>>
>>383332886
Literally who are you trying to convince? You know you're full of shit, and everybody else here does too. You're deliberately wasting your own time and it's not even entertaining.

Take a good look at yourself, man. I legitimately feel bad for you. Seek help, you can beat this.
>>
File: 1356942734670.png (337KB, 650x269px) Image search: [Google]
1356942734670.png
337KB, 650x269px
>>383333952
>>
>>383333858
And why is it post effects that can be changed? Post effects aren't as heavy as the base tech.
>>
>>383333653
No shit there are a million giveaways if you enlarge the image and inspect the jaggies you fucking retard. It looks real at first look.
>>
File: 20170630164924_1.jpg (646KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
20170630164924_1.jpg
646KB, 1920x1080px
>>383333858
>is it running at higher than 25 FPS?
30+ with my 1080 around medium+ bases and 40-45+ everywhere else

If you want general good graphics and good fps you can use epic preset with ground clutter completely off and you will pretty much be 60+ fps except for big bases.


I personally just disable Terrain and General shadows along with reduced ground clutter, everything else turned on and maxed except for obvious stupid shit like film grain and motion blur.

Some of these photos are just taken for curiosity of max graphics look like.

Also leaks, crashes and dumps memory unlike anything else
>>
>>383334306
>Post effects aren't as heavy as the base tech.
Depends on the effect actually, ambient occlusion is often a post FX and some games rely on it pretty heavily when it comes to their visuals.
Hell, post FX is actually often just as demanding as something like shadow quality, especially in engines that make use of a lot of advanced post FX, like UE4.
>>
>>383331049
>>383332146
Not him but video game graphics obviously encompasses tone mapping, which is important for the perceptual quality of graphics. Manually screwing with tone mapping for a particular shot goes well beyond the game's graphics per se.

And there are infinite ways to skin a cat here. There's lots of literature about tone mapping in general, and for games in particular/
>>
>>383278839
This looks good though
>>
>>383334342
>It looks real at first look.
Maybe if you don't have eyes.
>>
>>383334907
I too enjoy games with shadows disabled.
Worthless noise IMO.
>>
>>383334960
ok kid
>>
>>383334714
>Manually screwing with tone mapping for a particular shot goes well beyond the game's graphics per se
Beyond the graphics huh?
hmmmm... so that means "not" the graphics right?
>>
File: DEQSAesXYAAFU2u.jpg (108KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]
DEQSAesXYAAFU2u.jpg
108KB, 1200x675px
>>383335118
Shadows are present in the game, but stuff like that doesn't load at certain distances.
>>
File: para 1.jpg (2MB, 3904x1291px) Image search: [Google]
para 1.jpg
2MB, 3904x1291px
>>
>>383336512
Which is sad, even GTAV which has a lot more to render can do distance shadows
>>
File: qDAS.jpg (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]
qDAS.jpg
2MB, 2560x1440px
Shame screenshots are far darker than in game is. Only game I have ever played that does this
>>
File: 1499452168292.png (589KB, 686x750px) Image search: [Google]
1499452168292.png
589KB, 686x750px
>>383336512
>>383338118
Any of you two have proof of any of this?
>>
>>383333450
Thank you for linking this.
>>
File: DDDA 2016-02-05 16-23-26-08.jpg (250KB, 1920x1066px) Image search: [Google]
DDDA 2016-02-05 16-23-26-08.jpg
250KB, 1920x1066px
This counts?
>>
>>383338448
Learn to follow replies
>>
>>383338717
So no, then
>>
>>383338717
So that is a no i take it? You didn't provide any proof.
>>
>>383338857
You're dumb
>>
>>383339006
No, you're just a troll
>>
File: 1449918384046.jpg (66KB, 477x324px) Image search: [Google]
1449918384046.jpg
66KB, 477x324px
>>383339223
>troll
>>
>>383339463
How buttblasted are you though?
Thread posts: 479
Thread images: 211


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.