>Today we’re thrilled to announce a new class of historical

Doesn't matter, they already fucked up the Rome games so we will never have another game in the timeline where Rome is at its prime.

they should make "Modern: Total War"

>>382947171
>Today we’re thrilled to announce a new class of historical Total War game on PC. Released under a new badge, Total War Saga games will be standalone spin-off titles focusing on exciting pivotal moments in history rather than whole historical eras.

So basically "we're thrilled to announce a new class of historical Total War DLC on PC".

>>382947171

so they're ditching the whole RTS aspect and going full RTT?

and with a specific event focus, that surely isn't going to get limited or anything.

I hate when you start off with like seven settlements. I like to build my way up so I know what I'm doing.

Also what interesting Roman time-period haven't they already done?

>>382947171

I'm tired of Rome though

So, another Medieval Total War?

>>382949736
What RTS aspect? Total war has always been TBS & RTT.

>>382947590
>There will never be a worthy sequel to the original Rome
Fuck.

1600-1200BC era when?

>>382950461
>If you liked Fall of the Samurai, and the kind of gameplay we delivered with it, then you’re going to enjoy what we’ve got planned for our first Saga title.
Now

What is the best mod for Rome? Particularly in my case a graphical overhaul primarily that keeps it mostly vanilla. Something like the mods in Rome II that give it Attila map textures and add more settlements/buildings etc visible