Graphics thread

>>382841179
Okay...

Personally, I think Witcher 2 had great graphics. It seemed romantic (in the literary sense) and victorian. Very fitting to the game. However chapter 3 was pretty atrocious.

Witcher 3 is probably the best optimized game considering it's stellar graphics, but they're a little too cartoony for me and I think the game is overrated.

>>382841179
Also keep in mind that's not really graphics but rather: rendering. And the rest of the game isn't going to look that detailed and shaded.

File: witcher3ultra.jpg (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1440px

>>382841489
I dunno, I think TW3 looks pretty great

File: witcher2.jpg (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>382841709
And TW2 looked like this. Pretty meh.

File: The Order_ 1886_20170705021249.png (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>382841179
Still The Order, nothing can compete with that game, especially not PC or Xbox games.

File: The Order_ 1886_20170705020436.png (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>382842196
Oh wow I completely forgot to mention Nintendo consoles in my post here >>382842204 but I guess that just shows how far behind and irrelevant Nintendo is. So sad!

>>382841575
>that's not really graphics but rather: rendering
What game has graphics that aren't rendered?

File: photo_mode.jpg (4MB, 3840x4320px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3840x4320px

>>382842204
>>382842429
The order look good but a little too blurred all the time.
>>382841179
You can make anything look great if you're only rendering 1 room at the time, also, that is in photo mode, otherwise it look like a blurry mess like the order.

>>382841709
> Witcher 3
The grown man's legend of Zelda
>>382841884
> Witcher 2
A man's game through and through

File: The Order_ 1886_20170705005104.png (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

>>382842458
Ignore him, it's just a salty PC guy who has to make excuses because his $1500 PC doesn't have games that look as good as this.

>>382842458
It's not real time rendering its moreso just a stage that is loaded into the world

>>382842458
That anon probably meant to draw the distinction between real-time and pre-rendered. OP's image is pre-rendered.

File: IMG_7015.jpg (161KB, 1080x608px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1080x608px

>>382842953
WOw nice 144p resolution and dark screen very jealous!

File: The Order_ 1886_20170703004438.png (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

>>382842985
Keep the excuses coming.

>>382842672
>Enables sharpening in photomode to make sure there is a difference
Pathetic.

>>382842204
Anything that doesn't look like its got vaseline on it can compete

>>382843026
>OP's image is pre-rendered.
No, that's in-game

File: The Order_ 1886_20170705005307.png (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

>>382843090
>console open world game
>best looking ever
>608p

top kek

>>382843206
Yeah, sonnyfags are this lame

>>382841179
Who cares, graphics don't make a game good. Go look at pictures or something.

File: Horizon Zero Dawn™_20170310234011.jpg (819KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

819KB, 3840x2160px

>>382843242
>vaseline
Anyone who says this is retarded.

>>382843482
Good graphics makes a game better than same game without good graphics.

File: The Order_ 1886_20170705020047.png (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>382843482
Good graphics make a good game even better

>>382843523
I'm sorry that nobody cares about your smeared game

File: photomode.jpg (4MB, 3840x4320px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3840x4320px

>>382842672
Here's the same image but with the top one (in-game) sharpened and vignetted. Barely any difference between it and photomode.

File: Horizon Zero Dawn™_20170312165650.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

>>382843734
My smeared game? What are you talking about?
Horizon doesn't have a soft presentation.

OP, I think you're confusing art style with graphic fidelity.
The order per example, have beautiful artstyle and lighting, it focus on highly detailed character models while using low textures and low poly models for the scenery, blurring it to hide that, but that work great, you see, in gaming you often need to use some techniques and optimizations to make something look better than it actually is.

>>382844032
Yeah it's just the gameplay that's smeared lmao

File: The Order_ 1886_20170705014229.png (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>382844384

File: Horizon Zero Dawn™_20170312201742.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

>>382844496
Yeah this looks smeared right?

File: U4.jpg (977KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

977KB, 1920x1080px

>>382844384
I'm sorry anon but I think you're mistaken. These interior graphics are unmatched by any game.

>uncharted
>4k

Maximum retard, it runs lower than horizon's resolution and that uses checkerboarding to scale up to 4k

What's the best looking game I can play for free?

File: Unreal.jpg (278KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 1920x1080px

>>382844706
See, in that very picture, everything is pitch black, so you can't actually see anything, but you can notice the barrell and pillow on chair have lower texture resolution than of the character.
On top of that, everything is blurred and you can't move the camera angle, so, you can just "bake" the lighting into the scene to make it look better, kinda of like this demo running on unreal engine.
Its shows a pretty artstyle but you definitively can't judge the "graphics" of that scene, at all.

File: unrealparis05.jpg (826KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

826KB, 1920x1080px

>>382845053
You call that a "Game", but nothing it it is interactive, the lighting is also fixed, there isn't any kind of dynamic movement in there.
When you don't have to move stuff, you can "bake" the textures so they look good, but that's all, they wont move, that's why you only see that kind of detail in that house only 1 time, never again in the entire game.

File: order.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>382845229
Well shit it tends to be dark when the only light source is a candle.

>pcúcks posting unreal engine demos again

>>382845229
>>382845442
It's really sad when PCfags resort to posting tech demos

>>382844974
Yeah a bit shit smeared lmao

File: u.jpg (3MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2560x1440px

>>382845531
Im just explaining how devs use tricks and optimizations to make some artstyles look incredible, like the games you're posting.
But graphically, that look blurred, because the game can't output a sharper image quality.
This is from a game, if you wanted a more "real" example, that run at whatever resolution you want and all the object and textures look sharp.

>>382845681
>>382845531
>sonyfags posting pictures of a game area where you all you do is walk around a house and it's literally the gameplay equivalent of an engine demo

Very sad.

>>382843367
Console anti aliasing kek

nuff said fag

File: Horizon Zero Dawn™_20170310203603.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>382845442
Why does it look like there is a sharpening filter that fucks the reflections up?

Also why compare a non-game to a real game?

File: 1470090143921.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>382845849
>that pic
>doesn't even look remotely realistic
>blurry ground textures

>>382845849
>>382845947
Let me know when you find a game with better looking interiors. I'll wait.

>>382846159
Why don't you post some screen shots of landscape or distance so we can see that shitty jaggy crapfest and not a few closely rendered plants and dirt.

Also 30 fps

>>382846241
Let me know when you find something that has more gameplay than an engine demo in interiors like that.

I'll wait.

>>382846241
Look at all those jaggies, zero anti aliasing just to keep it running at 15 frames per second. Real impressive.

File: u3.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>382846159
Zero Dawn look awesome too, again with most models of chacters/enemies.
>>382846241
Interior of what? That scene is static and its only 1 house wide, you could play unreal tournament right now with this kind of graphics and gigantic world maps

File: The Order_ 1886_20170705010902.png (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

>>382845947
t. buttmad pcúck

>>382845849
>WOW ITS SO BLURRY WELP LET ME POST THIS ULTRA SMALL MAP TO """""BTFO"""""" YOU

I'll take dwarf fortress depth of gameplay over some caked house interior lmao

File: Horizon Zero Dawn™_20170310212610.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>382846295
I don't have many pics that go far into the horizon.

>>382842204
>>382842429
>>382842953
>>382843116
>>382843367
>>382843690
>>382844706
>>382845531
Wow animated movies sure look cool

File: 1494956004557.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>382846368
>>382846412
>>382846536
>more excuses and still no PC game that looks better
As expected

File: 1492453824073.jpg (173KB, 618x618px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 618x618px

>>382841179
>>382845053
>>382846241
>reverse image search
>dumping pictures from some 'game photographer's pinterest
>again

>>382842953
>just a salty PC guy who has to make excuses because his $1500 PC doesn't have games that look as good as this.

While it looks like any other fps in the last 10 years...

What do you people get out of arguing about this?

>>382846664
Feel free stay out of graphics threads then lmao

>>382846845

I enjoy seeing them peck at each other and knowing they're not smart enough to play Dwarf Fortress.

>>382846797
See:
>>382845442
>>382845229

>try and say 'game' while posting pictures of areas where there's literally no gameplay

You may as well just post screenshots of Uncharted cutscenes and it would basically be the same argument

>>382846845
>Graphics thread
>board full with autists
Yeah what could possibly go wrong

>>382846845
An incredibly insecure sonyfat tries to justify his buyers remorse.

Everybody else gets to laugh

>>382842953
>a game no one played is some kind of benchmark for console graphics

File: 1498506443546.jpg (24KB, 317x284px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 317x284px

>>382841709
>pretty great
>that rock texture

File: pcry.png (4MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1920x1080px

>>382847012
There's gameplay in the house you have been proven wrong last thread already. Keep crying.

>>382844032
>>382844974
>a game made by slavshits ten years ago for $15 and a bottle of luksasowa has better looking rocks

File: b2eb313103238d1fb98aba3f16663cd32.jpg (1015KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1015KB, 1920x1080px

>>382847012
>keeps trying to use tech demos in the argument
Have you no self respect?

File: JCuJR4j.jpg (824KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

824KB, 3840x2160px

>>382846295
Horizon ironically has a horrible draw distance, photo mode screenshots never show this for a reason

>>382847409
You got BTFO last thread when you refused to show gameplay in any of the areas you were posting pictures of actually

Bit desperate that you just want to do it again

File: 1490962490484.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

This thread is funny.

>>382847389
Pretty sure thats not ultra because I play it on med and it looks kinna better
Also look at the draw distance

File: pckeks.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

This kills the PCúck

>>382847542
lmaoing @ that """grass"""

File: Nox_profile_color_black.jpg (700KB, 4040x1938px) Image search: [Google]

700KB, 4040x1938px

>>382846797

>>382847621
The people on this thread

>Graphics will start reaching the point of diminishing return soon
>Sony, who's been focusing on GRAFX, won't be unique anymore when everyone else catches up
>They can't make a game fun to save their own asses
>Other companies will have fun games and have GRAFX
>Sony dies and all sonydarkies get subjugated to the day of the rope.

>>382847521
Unreal has as much gameplay as the areas you keep posting. Why do you keep calling it a tech demo?

I mean its a game by your own definition

>>382847542
Is that Wildlands? Looks kind of comfy

File: IMG_20150715_173202.jpg (3MB, 2712x2488px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2712x2488px

>>382847704
It's okay anon, we all know you don't go outside.

>>382847704
Wildlands grass has physics, some of it will even bend realistically when you step on it

HZD has no grass physics except for some patches of tall grass

>>382847717
>they couldn't render this in an actual environment
lmao

>>382847704
The AA is probably TAA which makes things blurry in motion

>>382847875
Wait, what is this from?

>>382848263
It's a photo of a field.

>>382848263
Skyrim Re-remastered

>>382848263
It's a picture you donut.

File: 332712560c96c9a06109043dc5cc827b.png (528KB, 539x433px) Image search: [Google]

528KB, 539x433px

>>382847875
lul

File: 30451068460_e756d35a51_o.jpg (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>382847542
*Also on PS4

File: 89c45b4a6c4ae6e2b4e5b886d5fc93b4.jpg (522KB, 1272x611px) Image search: [Google]

522KB, 1272x611px

>>382847862
Yes it's Wildlands IT LOOKS SOOO GOOD!!! *brofist*

>>382848606
Ubishit does it again

File: Grass.png (951KB, 799x521px) Image search: [Google]

951KB, 799x521px

>>382848435

>>382847601
You're wrong

>>382848890
Stop proving yourself wrong

>>382849029
Proving myself wrong about what?
I'm not the anon that doesn't go outside and doesn't actually know what grass looks like.

File: Nox_Hanger_1.jpg (710KB, 4000x1938px) Image search: [Google]

710KB, 4000x1938px

>>382848016
https://youtu.be/STwVI6_xWqc?t=917

>>382848469
PS4 (even Pro) version looks laughably worse, it's probably why Digital Foundry didn't compare it, it's the one current gen AAA game where the PC version is far ahead

File: 1fe747bd3c5d20ff3947aa50adb57318cb2ce8ae_hq.jpg (62KB, 584x576px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 584x576px

This game came 2 years ago and no console has ever had these graphics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGyaR2sSBkA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23tAZqWfe5M

File: 35506580451_a5c7b43372_o.jpg (932KB, 2800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

932KB, 2800x1200px

>>382849148
>Has to lie about PS4 to make his favourite Nvidia platform look good
The game isn't out on PS4 yet. Keep lying though.

File: PC best graphics.jpg (315KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 1920x1080px

>>382849095
Nice interiors bro
Where are the shadows?

File: 1489866745367.jpg (239KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 1920x1080px

>>382849538
>The game isn't out on PS4 yet.
GRW?
Are you retarded?

>>382849538
that draw distance is shit, it's hidden by fog m8

>>382849075
Real life grass obviously doesn't look like the grass in Wildlands.

>>382849806
No game has grass that looks as good as real life grass (except maybe >>382847557), but GRW's grass is easily among the more accurate.

File: The Order_ 1886_20170703125514.png (4MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3840x2160px

>>382849378
Yeah too bad that game is also on PS4

>>382849701
>posting the outside of a map
>WOW IT LOOKS BAD LOL

I hate consolefags so much

Wasting my time

File: DDuE-DTVYAAb5AJ.jpg (96KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 1200x675px

>>382849701
Thought it was the hunter. Regardless. Looks the same on console.

File: 1489614486400.jpg (1012KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1012KB, 3840x2160px

>>382850041

>>382850120
>Regardless. Looks the same on console.
Nah, the console version of GRW looks nowhere near that good.

File: noblur.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>382849924
>aliasing, artifacts and a blur effect to simulate motion instead of ACTUAL motion
>JUST LIKE REAL LIFE!

File: 1491636494247.png (313KB, 512x382px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 512x382px

>>382850041
But it doesnt look anything like that

Stupid idiot you better be trolling with all this ''no game on pc has better graphics than uncharted 4'' shit you are spouting because I just proved you wrong

Consoles cant compete against pc for the simple fact that pcs are constantly getting new hardware releases

>>382850231
>Motion blur is bad because it's not real
Uhh...no shit?
Your eyes can't accurately simulate motion blur on a stationary monitor while you're looking at the same area, that's kind of why it exists.
Is it overdone often times? Sure.
Does that mean it's bad all the time?
No.

>>382850274
Too bad there's nothing you can do with all that new hardware since all you get is console ports that look like shit

File: pzkVpH2.jpg (709KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

709KB, 1920x1080px

>>382841489
>Witcher 3 is probably the best optimized game
heh nice optimization you got there marcin, game drops frames for no fucking reason in forrest even tho i have oced gtx 1060 + i7 7700k. Game has bad optimization if open world game doesn't even use cpu property.

File: 1498232791-driveclub-tm-20170623171814.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>382850174
Draw distance is the same.
Regardless Driveclub has a better draw distance and graphics all together.

File: walker simulator.webm (3MB, 768x432px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 768x432px

i wish we had more of this instead of grafx

File: 1455526881496.jpg (281KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 1920x1080px

>>382850461
>Draw distance is the same.
It's not actually, no console game has the same draw distance as their PC counterparts, and Driveclub isn't an open world game and the environment itself is pretty basic-looking and lacking in interactivity.

File: 1447782540434.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>382850612
Pre-emptive .png in case I've triggered your autism.

File: 35616650195_a6d4b1bfa4_o.jpg (1MB, 2160x2880px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2160x2880px

>>382850612
GRW has shit physics, animations and effects all-together anyway.
Why bring it up?

>>382850764
So does Driveclub.
What's your point?

File: 1449356018537.jpg (85KB, 808x805px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 808x805px

>>382850612
>>382850691
>Driving game optimized to look its best at high speed
>Intentionally stops the cars with the worst paintjob possible to get the worst screenshots he could
Geee i wonder who is behind this post.

File: 1447782067108.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>382850865
>D-don't look at the grafix, t-the blur's supposed to cover all the parts that look bad
My fucking sides.

how can ps4 pro do 4k yet the more powerful X has to do checker scaling or whatever

>>382851090
Neither of them can do actual 4k in 90% of games and both make extensive use of checkerboarding.

File: 1482050455-driveclub-tm-20161217163857.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>382851018
>Posts screenshot that looks amazing
>"WOOPS"
Damn son why you do that? That pic has more trees than GRW has polygons lmao.

File: 1436230687134.jpg (583KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

583KB, 1920x1080px

>>382851332
>>Posts screenshot that looks amazing
Kek, is that a joke?

>>382851090
>>382851148
Wait what? The X uses checkerboarding too? I thought it was supposed to be more powerful so it could do native 4k. Damn consoles are pathetic.

>>382845119
The game of life.

>>382851482
Shit game. Good graphics but horrible luck based gameplay with artificial difficulty.

File: 28650902201_c05d828925_o.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>382851435
>Trying to make a bad screenshot in order to misrepresent a game
This is desperation people.
Regardless the game has been patched.

>>382847181
As an idort, I laugh at all of you. I love Zelda, I love Horizon Zero Dawn, I play mostly on PC, and my Xbone is really good at filling in what would otherwise be an empty spot in my entertainment center.

File: 1481943219606.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>382851787
>I-IT DOESN'T COUNT
Kek, keep going, this is funny.

File: 35181280205_1356a65d48_o.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>382851887
You are just showing how pathetic you are. Taking unflattering images and saving them just to shitpost. Hahaha. Happy to know that i am not wasting my life with something like that.

File: 1497390677416.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>382841179

That's all baked lighting, not than consolefags would know what that means.

If you don't want to deal with the sony shitposters, just let them circle jerk in their own shitty thread instead of giving them attention.

File: 1491774115571.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>382852126
>Shitpost on /v/ while playing DaS 3
>"Y-YOU'RE SO PATHETIC!"
Kek, this is amazingly hilarious.

>>382842953
>>382843116
>>382842429
>>382842204
>>382844706
>>382845531

Is this worth getting now that you can find it most places for under $10?

>These threads always devolve to game system faggotry.

You do realize that nobody cares what you play your games on, right?

File: 34727694223_d57ce60496_o.jpg (683KB, 2160x2880px) Image search: [Google]

683KB, 2160x2880px

>>382852272
Why don't you post pics of good graphics? By your logic you must be derailing this thread.

File: large.jpg (87KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 600x800px

>>382852527

File: 1465604026140.jpg (613KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

613KB, 1920x1080px

>>382852615
But I'm not, this thread turned into arguing 100 posts ago, I'm only contributing to that.
If it triggers you, you could always just filter me.

>>382846797
>>382841179
>>382845053
>>382846241
>>382847521


>ywn live in a house this comfy

>>382852574
It's because it's always started with
>WOW UNCHARTED/HORIZON SO GOOD
and then people explain that that "so good" is with shitloads of qualifiers like running at a low framerate with a dynamic/checkerboard resolution and also that in more common spots it looks fucking awful

>>382852687

Im aware what kind of game it is.

File: ssxiew.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>382852691
>I'm only contributing to that.
Hmmm what did he mean by this?
>If it triggers you, you could always just filter me.
What do you mean? Are you here to trigger people?

File: 1482799583177.jpg (366KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 1920x1080px

>>382852862
I'm here to trigger faggots just like the guys who originally started shitposting, like >>382842204, >>382842429, and >>382842196
I mean, if you didn't want this you wouldn't post shit.

>>382852796
OP did nothing wrong, you're just triggered because he started the thread with a game on a system you don't like. Grow up.

File: 1498838384882.jpg (312KB, 648x615px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 648x615px

>>382852823
>>382852691
>>382852687
>>382852272
>>382852139
>>382851887
>>382851435
>>382851018
>>382850691
>>382850612
>>382850174
>>382849701
>>382853009
So he triggered you so hard you just had to find the worst screenshots of Sony games specifically so you could "trigger" him? Why didn't you shit on The Order 1886's graphics then? You just shit on anything Sony related.
Also...
You done?

File: 1489163326936.jpg (522KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

522KB, 2048x1152px

>>382853145
You do realize that The Order 1886 is a Sony game, right?

>>382853212

>make false claims
>cry one people prove you wrong

File: 1489615138714.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>382853328
Whoops, wrong anon.
>>382853212

File: Arma3_x64_2017-07-03_15-33-49-08.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

jpg so quality isn't best

>>382852574
>Devolve
This thread literally started as a console war. OP has been posting the same flame bait for how many months now?

>>382853212
SEETHING

File: 1496904872-gran-turismo-tm-sport-version-de-test-beta-fermee-20170608084244.png (2MB, 1877x763px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1877x763px

>>382853412
Yes i am aware. But he only posted The Order 1886 not all Sony games.
He triggered you with The Order 1886 screens not with Driveclub screens.

>>382842196
What even prompted this lol. The Switch wasn't mentioned at all.

And, as I'm sure you're already aware, the Switch also doubles as a handheld. Comparing to a console that is completely stationary is disingenuous.

>>382852796
Reminder, there is a report function.

>>382848606
>>382848868
>muh compressed youtube image i sure proved them that wildlands looks like shit XDDDD

File: witcher 3 downgrade grass.jpg (246KB, 946x1000px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 946x1000px

>>382848435
>>382848890

>>382854304
Weak bait

File: 1474048185506.jpg (509KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

509KB, 1920x1080px

>>382853784
The point isn't that he posted TO1886 screenshots, it's that he shitposted.
If you don't want people shitposting, don't shitpost to begin with.

File: XR_3DA 2017-07-04 18-33-10-279.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

2006 btw

File: aae69efdcb8a3954bd12a97a840b4cc2.png (249KB, 345x383px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 345x383px

>>382854758
What do you mean?
I wasn't the guy who posted TO1886 pics.
Besides. If you get triggered do you think it is a good idea to trigger him back?

>>382841179
that room looks comfy as fuck

Sony is fine, they offer the best platform for Japanese games. Sure the hardware isn't the latest but not everyone feels the need to constantly upgrade for a few extra pixels, it's not nearly as bad as having to deal with 240p because devs are cheap as fuck. Mustards just need to be arrogant about everything and hate fun.

File: starwarsbattlefronttrial_2016_12_16_11_24_30_232.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

>>382855582
It's always a good idea to fight fire with fire.
Again, if you don't want people to shitpost, don't shitpost.
That's kind of why these threads have been so shit for the past year or so, they've just been shitposting threads.
It's like making a TLH thread on /co/ and being surprised when most of it is people posting borderline porn and bad fanfics.

>>382850553
>richard hammond pops down to the shop.webm

File: 00f14ef3c7c31200ea4128a0dd7ee55b.png (218KB, 532x238px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 532x238px

>>382855865
>Again, if you don't want people to shitpost, don't shitpost.
Why do you say this?
I can only assume that you like being triggered cuck.

File: superposition_2017_04_20_11_44_59_869.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>382856012
Kek, go on, post it.
Please, I'd love for you to start posting cuck porn.

>>382855729
...unless they choose to release those games on PC.

File: iz62Ren.png (4MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1920x1080px

>>382854630
Weak memeing, and that's just high settings, game looks even better on ultra settings but is demanding as fuck

>>382855729
Say what you will but the 3DS is a goldmine for Japanese developers, far lucrative than the PS4. Over 4 to 5 times the install base of the PS4 in Japan with games a fraction the cost to make.

>>382845053

I don't think naughty dog has the best-looking games on the market, but the team they have that does flesh out the interior of buildings has got to be the absolute best in their category. When I played TLOU on PS3, the interior environments were just so incredibly natural, compared to so many other games where they just seem off.

>>382856359
>Ubisoft downgrades is a meme
Sure anon, post the area of the E3 footage that supposedly looks the same with ultra settings

>>382856514
Just like cheap mobile games, cancerous

File: Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon® Wildlands2017-5-18-17-40-6.jpg (674KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

674KB, 1920x1080px

>>382856731
even if there was downgrade it was pretty slim since game looks pretty good and only arma 3 can have as big render distance as this game. Also comparing ps4 footage to pc e3 one. kek

>>382857661
>those textures
Yeah definitely bait

>>382857356
Not really? The problem with mobile is the lack of physical buttons, as it severely narrows how you can interact with the game. Handhelds don't have that issue.

File: Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon® Wildlands2017-5-13-21-56-52.jpg (483KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 1920x1080px

>>382857786
>i don't like it
>IT'S A BAIT!

no shit some textures looks bad since it's an open world game not cinematic game with non-open sections like uncharted or the order 1886. Witcher 3 and Gta V also looks like shit up close but vistas are top notch. For me what matters is nice looking background with varied locations.

>>382852204
is that like making a cake in an oven?

File: 1499224143429.jpg (8KB, 323x343px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 323x343px

>>382856202
Why do you like cuckporn?

SW: Battlefront on PC
The Hunter: Call of The Wild on PC
Forza Horizon 2 and 3
Horizon Zero Dawn


Anything else drops frames or have a blur filter ALL OVER the screen

>>382856202
>tech demo with ultra super advanced grafix
>they couldn't even put in decent table textures
>most of the objects like the pencils and the open book don't even cast a shadow

>>382858589
hes not nearly on max settings
i dont blame him because its very unstable on my 1080 at max graphics and crashed
looked great though

Witcher 3 is a bit overrated, but it's well-optimized and looks great.

>>382856202
why is so painfully blurry? where the fuck is the definition? it's like watching a movie in an old theater, kek...take the blur away and it will look like fucking shit from last gen, you guys are so gullible it hurts...must be the ADHD

File: PC graphics.webm (3MB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 960x540px

>>382846797

File: hulk.png (24KB, 426x591px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 426x591px

>>382859410
Isn't this like a 5 year old demo? Why does it still look better than console games if this where we were literally 5 years ago?

File: xrEngine 2017-05-31 16-44-07-762.jpg (2MB, 3072x1728px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3072x1728px

>2008
>had volumetric lighting when no other games did

>>382859581
and volumetric fog

I have a 1080 ti and a good i7, what are some super pretty games I can run at 60fps and above?

File: BatmanAK 2017-06-09 19-50-23-726.jpg (963KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

963KB, 3840x2160px

>>382859728
Looks so good, felt like COP lost some of that.

>>382860040
all of them, arkham knight at 4k is pretty.

>>382859482
Because it's a tech demo dumbass. It also looks better than PC games.

>>382860237
I remember Arkham Knight having terrible performance issues on launch, I assume they fixed that? I guess I didn't really mean to ask what I can run but what I should run, I'm having trouble finding good looking games to play which I haven't already beaten.

>>382859581
>what is Crysis

File: record scratch yup thats me.jpg (688KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

688KB, 1920x1080px

wow look at these GRAPHICS #fortheplayers

File: charted (1).jpg (673KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

673KB, 1920x1080px

>>382860695
truly the best experience in gaming

File: charted (3).jpg (706KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

706KB, 1920x1080px

>>382860817
how can pc cucks even compete?

File: NzWs3bA.jpg (425KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 1920x1080px

hoohoo haahaa

File: YzSQpf1.jpg (874KB, 2560x1080px) Image search: [Google]

874KB, 2560x1080px

>>382860994

File: 6445vLR.jpg (338KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 1920x1080px

>>382861246

>>382861314

N E V E R E V E R

File: 1498838347455.webm (3MB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 960x540px

>>382861314

File: 493340_screenshots_20170521222024_1.jpg (715KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

715KB, 1920x1080px

>>382861323
hey unchartedfag
can you please come out again with that photomode crap

>>382852827
I got it since it was on sale for like, 4 bucks. I'd say I got around halfway through before giving up. The dialogue and attention to detail is slightly higher than your average vidya(which honestly surprised me) but not as good as a decent film. And the story takes forever to go anywhere, if it does go anywhere. The point where I left off is I assume where it's supposed to get "good" but the "twist" didn't really seem worth it.

>>382861525
That looks laughably bad dude

>>382861314
>>382861441
what is this?

>>382861864
GTA V.
The first webm it's really hard to tell, but that's Del Perro pier at the end.
Also the "LOS SANTOS" freeway sign in the 2nd webm gives it away

>>382845442
>chromatic aberration
>obnoxious sharpening
>whiteout windows
>floating spoons
Despite that, it doesn't look bad as an image, but playing with that as part of a game would be hard on the eyes.

>>382841179
wow, looking at pictures is considered gaming nowadays...

>>382861864
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uN71W_Ke9M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZqH11eKp44

>>382862669
It's The Crew, it doesn't have mods

File: XR_3DA 2017-05-21 15-52-47-588.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>2006

>>382862979
2007*

File: Doom3.jpg (2MB, 2049x1025px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2049x1025px

>>382862979
>2004

File: 1489212268237.webm (3MB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 600x338px

hi guys

>>382864467
Doom 3 was the Crysis of 2004.

>>382862596
>>382862171
Welp that's convinced me, I'm selling my 390 while miners are in a frenzy and going to wait a few weeks to get a 1080 ti.

https://youtu.be/PECqrhxhpTA

>1000 + 800 + 200 + 5 + 2

File: 1366445060410.png (83KB, 222x287px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 222x287px

>>382862596
How does a simple lightning mod accomplish this.

Am I being memed?

File: 1489048520234.webm (3MB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 600x338px

a bit pungent indeed

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MGyaR2sSBkA

Star Wars Battlefront for PC as shitty as it is objectively has the best graphics, and is nigh photorealistic with the right lighting mod.

File: DriveClub.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

>>382864480
hello

>>382864917
Lighting is the most significant aspect of graphics

File: smh.gif (81KB, 182x249px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 182x249px

>>382865250
>Chromatic abberation

Ugh, my fucking eyes dude. Stopped after 2 seconds.

>>382865348
I'm sorry about your brain damage. It doesn't bother me one bit.

>>382860695
>>382860817
>>382860895

fucking kek

>>382865337
I guess that makes sense. After all, the STALKER games, when modded with more respectable textures so they don't look dated, look really good because they have really good lighting.

File: IMG_0380.jpg (288KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 1920x1080px

>>382865348
What's funny is the game doesn't even have chromatic abberation, I've played that game before and it looks like the faggot edited it in.

File: 1448408444878.gif (935KB, 285x235px) Image search: [Google]

935KB, 285x235px

>>382865427
>Defending chromatic abberation

This is nu-/v/

>>382865553
I'm just saying, if you are actually physically hurt by it, you have brain damage.

>>382865337
It triggers me how much people, even devs, don't realize/respect this. So many games, even modern games with fancy PBR pipelines, still rely on bruteforce postprocess filters to achieve lighting changes instead of, you know, actually competently lighting their shit.

>>382865710
No, you weren't just saying that. You thought it looked good and now you're embarrassed that you made a fool of yourself.

File: IMG_20170705_073619248.jpg (3MB, 5344x3006px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5344x3006px

>>382865250
nice framerate and nice chromatic aberration right there m8, also top notch illumination right there m8


>mfw I got baited into buying DC thanks to youtube videos
>mfw the game looks "meh" for 80% of the time in-game

>>382866035
There are so many things I dislike in this photo but I'm not going to tell you what they are.

>>382865940
Nope, if I thought it looked good I wouldn't say "it doesn't bother me", I would say "I like it". I thought the webm looked good despite it.

>>382866141
The fact that you posted it tells me everything I need to know.

>>382866141
>I never said I liked it
>By the way, I liked it

ok kid

>>382866035
There's a reason the guys who made the game went defunct.

https://youtu.be/L-klt1u_7RM

Lmao people think console graphics can hold a candle to PC graphics. Sad!

File: twinkle twinkle.webm (3MB, 720x396px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 720x396px

>>382866268
I don't think BF1 looks good at all. That shitty art style ruins any technical prowess it might have.

>>382866205
>reading comprehension

>>382866338
>shits on BF1
>thinks any aspect of TW3 looks good

>>382866338
I agree with you but TW3 also looks like shit

File: fireboi.webm (3MB, 800x412px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 800x412px

>>382866659
>>382866747
I also agree TW3 is a downgraded mess.

>>382866035
>top notch illumination right there m8
what does that even mean

>>382859482

Consoles are literally that far behind.

Like ARMA 3, which was made in 2012-2013 is still far more impressive than anything on the latest gen consoles.

>>382867090
He's making fun of your webm because the lighting is shit.

>>382866881
I'm glad we're in agreement anon

How's Arma 3 if I don't intend to play online a lot? I just want a milsim with some missions on a big landmass like Arma 2, but better.

>>382867190
It's not my webm retard

>>382867545
Yes it is

>>382867573
I bet you're the anon with the brain damage, makes sense

>>382867712
clearly same guy lol

File: arma master race.jpg (715KB, 1271x2027px) Image search: [Google]

715KB, 1271x2027px

>>382867128

>>382867712
congrats, someone just baited you into outing yourself as a samefag. Really fucking smart, faggot.

>>382867826
>>382867870
I AM the person who posted the webm, but I'm not the person he was replying to. You guys are dumb as fuck.

>>382841709

except it doesn't

>>382852527
I got it for $5 for the purpose of it being a neat tech demo. It's worth $5. Especially if you can appreciate some of the detail work they put into some of their scenes

>>382868026
Sure thing, buddy. Whatever you say.