More people are playing old CoD4 then the newest CoD's on PC. Kinda sad to see really, coming from someone who put in 600+ hours in CoD1, 2, WaW and CoD4 individually.
The new CoD games on release date doesn't even reach the top ten on Steam anymore.
Because the PC ports die and have the same few thousand people playing them moving from one to another, you literally can't find people in advanced warfareo n PC anymore, almost 100% of them moved on to blops3, then a good chunk of those players moved to infinite warfare (then back to blops 3).
>>382154307
Because the old ones had free content on PC and dedicated servers.
You just explained it in your image.
PC gamers don't like that stupid p2p crap with awful matchmaking and no mod tools.
BO3 tried to add in a server browser with dedicated servers and mod tools, but unfortunately for them this was over a year after release and everyone had already moved on and stopped caring.
because everything post mw2 is garbage
>>382154453
>then a good chunk of those players moved to infinite warfare
Define "good chunk."
IW peaked at like 15k, BO3 peaked at 64k.
>>382154307
Because it's fucking boring
>>382154307
Because its a hacker fuck fest
PC has so many options for FPS
Its not like console where they only have like 3-4 FPS shooting games
>FPS shooting games
>First Person Shooter Shooting Games
>>382154307
now add a column foraIWnet;_;
>Not balanced for lean
Pc players are smarter and realize titanfall2 is the better cod. They also have better fps games then console
>>382154307
Dead because cheaters
>>382156490
>14k players worldwide at this very moment
It's dead.
>>382154307
>then
It's 'than'
I'd guess it's fatigue. If they just updated MW over and over again, it'd have more concurrent players than all cod games out now.
Having said that, I just bought Bops 3 and really hope there are enough players for some zombie games.
>>382154307
>COD2
>64 players
I'm sold. I did not know this.
>>382157505
Aw shit, I meant to put down 4. Oh well. I'm sure no one will notice.
>>382154307
Your pic answer why. Terrible design decision.
Pc has like, a million different FPS to choose from. People just went to a better one.
>>382157379
>I'd guess it's fatigue.
You'd be wrong, it's because the games went from being PC-centric with typical PC features (mod tools, dedicated community servers, console commands, custom map tools, etc.) to being console-centric with DLC that fractures the community, loot drops, p2p shit, and awful matchmaking.
The only AAA game with the right philosophy towards DLC is Titanfall.
>>382154307
>do consoles get pic related and similar
>no
>would cod die on consoles if they did
>probably not as much, but yes
>>382157790
But pubg coming out on consoles soon
>>382157854
And an awful lot of the cod crowd will move to it. However it's not the same as having lots of popular shooters to choose between.
>>382157601
It's a clusterfuck above 8v8, and most servers are bigger than that unfortunately.
>>382154307
>dumbed down for console
There you go.
Same with battlefield
Bfbc 2>bf1/bf4
>>382159058
bc2 is literally a console game, with 32 players, barely any vehicles and on much smaller scale
Because the ports are fucking garbage and PC gamers at their own alternative garbage games like Dota2 and CSGO.
>>382154661
This was mainly because Activision absolutely didn't like the idea of both things interfering with their profits from dlc to add content. Treyarch still managed to get both in by striking a deal to add those after support for bo3 has been dropped and iw became the new game.
Its sad but this is the best we'll get. It's the same publisher that resells old maps as dlc in a remaster, forces you to pay 90usd for the bundle and add p2w microtransactions in a 10 years old game.
I hate Call of Duty on PC. No where to play vanilla anymore, just retarded 64 player death matches the maps weren't designed for.