name a company thats fallen from grace harder than this.

Capcom

>>381978098
>implying it ever rose in the first place

>>381978098
Really didn't have far to fall.

>>381978215
REVII was okay. Although they shit the bed with that DLC campaign that got delayed indefinitely.

nobody can top Blizz

>>381978098
Konami.

File: Rage_cover[1].jpg (93KB, 300x370px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 300x370px

Remember when id did this?

File: leonardo-1075829-MA018exterior1_S-image.jpg (56KB, 650x357px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 650x357px

There will not be a GTA6.

Just a Standalone GTA Online 2.

Anything EA touches

>>381978408
It's honestly still alright. A solid 7/10

>>381978098
Gearbox.

At least they aren't releasing a yearly GTA yet, you know EA or Ubisoft sure as hell would with the amount of power that IP has.

>>381978098
Square Soft/Enix

>>381978098
Valve; they don't even make games now, just micro-transaction vehicles.

>>381978521
They literally just released Automata, and KH3 looks pretty good.

>>381978098
Really, they have all become disgraceful, the only way forward is backward.

File: Screenshot_20170627-012127.png (425KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 1440x2560px

>14 games from 2001-2004
>1 game (port) this gen first 4 years

>>381978215

fpbp

>>381978098
Konami
Capcom soon to be Konami tier

>>381978331
>REVII was okay

no

>>381978098
I'm glad rockstar is getting shit on by the pc community, fuck 'em. Hopefully it'll mean R* won't release another fucking game on pc for awhile.

File: 220px-Taketwo_logo.svg.png (3KB, 220x157px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 220x157px

>>381978098
Take-Two

>>381978098
Ubisoft.

>>381978408
they spent way too much time on their new engine (at the time) and megatextures that they forgot to actually make a game.

the only good thing that game had going was the female character models.

>>381978098
>>381978231
>>381978303
>>381978759
>>381978904
The hell are you guys talking about?

When have they made a bad game? What did they do? The last game they made was GTA and that came out 4 years ago

Did you hate the new GTA DLC so much it irredeemably tarnished the company in your eyes?

>>381978761
Rockstar didn't even develop all of those

Rare... Fallen so hard you forgot they existed.

File: $50.00.jpg (74KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1280x720px

>>381978098
This multiplayer exclusive rocket bike is worth nearly 50 american dollars of in-game currency. How is this allowed?

>>381978098

A fall from grace would imply that they ever had grace in the first place.

>>381979014
This, how the fuck was rare not listed first?

>>381978098
Rare

>>381978998
Everyone hates on the online because its the most bullshit sharkcard money grab imaginable.
Except that is all Take-Two's fault... Soooooooo...

Valve.

>>381979090

Because we've forgotten that they existed at this point.

>>381979049
because 10 year olds can use their moms credit cards

>>381979009
Developers or not, R* at least funded the games they didn't make on that list. OP asked about companies, not developers.

>>381978215
Capcom is slowly redeeming themselves.
Slowly.
>>381978720
Are we talking companies as in developers or publishers?

>>381978761
Online popularity ruined them. They can sit back and rake in the cash on a last gen port now without making a new GTA all gen if they want. GTA VI will take away everyones progress online and they'll have a screaming fit.

Valve by far. They will never make a game ever again. At this point I don't want them to, all of the talent moved on.
>>381978231
>$10,000 has been deposited into your GTA Online account.

>Konami
>Capcom
>EA
>Bioware
>Bethesda
>Nintendo (I won't believe in comeback until I see those games)
>Ubisoft
>id Software
feel free to chose
you shouldn't blame companies that you can't take same amount of revenue as you did before

File: 1346389498367.jpg (230KB, 597x575px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 597x575px

>>381979049
Hover bikes in TERA cost like, $99 or $199. I wanted one so bad until I saw how much gold, money, or luck with loot crates they required. Every time I'd see one in game I'd just become depressed thinking about someone blowing that much time or money into something so cool but so fucking dumb. $50 should get a full blown expansion, not a fucking rocket bike.

>>381979049
Can it fly?

File: peebee.jpg (407KB, 3481x1964px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 3481x1964px

>>381979067
but mass effect andromeda is good

still waiting for Midnight Club 5

>>381978408
its a good game.

>>381979090
they were only good when they worked hand in hand with Nintendo, Golden Eye and Perfect Dark sucked, people only like it cause they played it with friends.

>>381979273

>Ubisoft

This one hurts. They were damn good prior to the 7th gen.

>>381979273
I think Ubisoft wasn't really ever that great, our standards have just gone up

Blizzard
Rare
Valve
Bioware
Raven Software (seriously, reading through their game history is depressing)
Bethesda
Too many to count

Is this a meme or are people literally that upset over the existence of GTA online despite V being an email excellent addition to the franchise even only considering the single player

>>381979331
pretty much. If you've got the wings extended and hit the boost, you can take off from flat ground. the boost only recharges if your wheels hit the ground though.

nintendo

>>381979419
fuck off phoneposter, if GTAV had actually gotten the single player content alongside the multiplayer updates, things would be different. There's all this content they just won't let you have fun with unless you grind like a slave or pay them stupid amounts of money. I honestly think it would be more cost effective to get a second job just to fund GTAV online purchases, rather than earn the money in game.

>>381979259
If they do try and make another one it's going to be another multiplayer esports game. Maybe TF3 or something to compete with Overwatch if people start getting tired of Dota 2/CS:GO.

>>381979419
I quite enjoyed GTA V, it was definitely a step up from IV in my eyes. The problem is the multiplayer has refused to stop growing, leaving the developers to only focus on more multiplayer shit. I'm curious if single player expansions were planned until they realized they could add in some new vehicles and get nearly free money for doing so. It's also worrying because if this strategy is working so well, why would they ever hop off of it? I'm worried RDR2 will focus on multiplayer to the detriment of the campaign

>>381979419
The single player was kind of weak. It has like 40 less missions than GTA IV with a big swath of desert and wilderness with nothing interesting and few criminal activities on the map.

>>381978098
Rare

>>381979397
>last non-CoD game they made was Singularity
At least they went out with a bang

>>381979693
So if they did something they haven't done for any other gta ever in the history of GTA except randomly for 4 that would make it all better but because they decided to develop something that wasn't single player they feel from grace? That's indefensibly retarded.

>>381978998
I think you might have missed the memo where take-jew killed off the entire modding community so they could shill their scummy online practices harder

>>381980000
I actually enjoyed the RDR multiplayer. If they fuck it up and turn it into RDR:O I'll never forgive rockstar.

>>381979419
When is singleplayer getting
- Insurance
- Bunkers
- Hydras
- Savages
- Yachts Even though they are useless
- Mark 2 Guns
- Special Vechiles like the Jetcar
- New cars like the fastest cars in the game
- New missions
- Literally any updates ever.

>>381978098
GTAO cheater spotted

>>381980267
I think you might have missed the memo where take-jew took that back when rockstar told them to cut it out
https://www.bleedingcool.com/2017/06/25/openiv-is-back-with-an-update-after-chatting-with-take-two-rockstar/

>>381980202
Not at all. DLC was not really a thing for early GTA. Rockstar then started producing single player DLC for GTAIV and Red Dead Redemption. Now, they'e refused to add the content they make as DLC to the single player because they think nobody would buy the shark cards and use the content in multiplayer. Which may be true, but it's indefensibly retarded to say that rockstar is still a gamer friendly company.

>>381979181
>slowly redeeming themselves.
how so?

File: PantherXL_sm.jpg (13KB, 405x302px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 405x302px

>>381978098
Madcatz, the decade before the last decade.

NEC.

Atari.

Capcom. EA.

>>381979419
The entire single player experience got shafted due to the existence of online. We could have had DLC on the same level as IV, but Rockstar figured they could rake in more cash by adding a never ending supply of inconsequential shit to multiplayer which they knew people would spend real cash on to use, mainly for the sake of stroking their e-cocks in front of other players

>>381980467
GTAO cheaters are heroes. Give everyone infinite money, make the game fun, screw R* over for screwing the players over.

>>381980543
That sounds like an elaborate way to say "they didn't make any single player add on to V" and frankly saying a Dev is shit for something they didn't make has always struck me as asinine, especially considering that what they did make was solid by any account

>>381980467
Fucking autist. Nobody wants to grind for money in any sandbox game, especially one as laughable as gta.

File: 1496608140588.jpg (601KB, 1487x1243px) Image search: [Google]

601KB, 1487x1243px

>>381979345
You don't have to lie

>>381980940
On the level of IV, so one okay and shirt one and one mediocre one

Woo hoo
But instead they made an entirely different thing
What a fall from grace

>>381980996
They won't even add the new cars and guns in SP which they could easily do

>>381980996
If that's what you gathered from my post, you're retarded.
>saying a Dev is shit for something they didn't make has always struck me as asinine
but they DID make the content you mong.
Yeah, I'm a bit let down that there was no single player add on that continued the lackluster story or told a different story, like in GTAIV. What's actually infuriating is that the multiplayer DOES get new content. I am mad that literally none of this content can be accessed outside of the multiplayer. I don't want to play GTAV multiplayer, it blows donkey dick. I want to play GTA by myself, and I want to be able to do it in single player. Literally the only thing Rockstar would have to do would be to release the content they create for multiplayer in the single player. Hell, charge me 5 bucks for the rocket bike, or the KnightRider car if it satisfies their jewy ways.

>>381980492
too late anon. Once you've lost trust, you're not getting it back

>>381981240
>Oh wow they didn't add two entire campaigns worth of DLC, which added new story and characters to the game along with a variety of additional weapons, vehicles and so forth which can be used during the main game and isn't restricted to the shitty online mode that they were shilling
>Haha that's nothing faggot, I can spend $50 on a bike with a rocket engine and clothes along with other shit I'm never going to use
How much money is being deposited to your online account right now

>>381978845
>no

Umm, no sweety it was good. For that time I will forgive you, but next time check your privileges first before starting writing stupid thing drumphy, okay?

>>381979181
LMAO

>>381978215
Came here to say this.

>>381981427
Oh I understand what you're saying
Cars added to MP that aren't added to so
I can see the frustration the, that makes way more fucking sense to me.

I don't feel it, but I understand it

>>381981643
What vehicles were added to the IV story by gay Tony and lost and damned

Like one bike?

And a shotgun?

File: Valve_head2.png (40KB, 320x239px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 320x239px

>>381978098
Valve

>>381979383
They killed M&M series and Lunar, they are shit in my book with some good published games here and there.

>>381981835
Don't forget the parachute, hombre :^)

>>381979067

this.

Are you all too new to remember the tortanic? dragon age 2? hamburger hepler?

>>381981835
Still more than been added to GTAV single player

File: 07d.jpg (16KB, 427x300px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 427x300px

This thread is reminding me that all of my favorite developers have become soulless corporations and I hate every single second im aware of this fact

>>381979331
glides a bit

>>381982171
The chosen people ruin everything anon get used to it

File: Daikatanabox.jpg (67KB, 410x500px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 410x500px

>>381978098
Still №1

Close followed by 3D Realms/ Gearbox fiasco.

>>381981943
I really got btfo'd

>>381982132
Goes right back to what I'm saying
They decided to do something different
And they did far more with it
But because it wasn't the same thing thing that there was no actual expectation of somehow people threw a fit. Which makes no sense.

It just seems dumb, I have difficulty finding any point of empathy
>Make a thing
This thing was alright
>Make a different thing
THIS THING IS NOT THE OTHER THING

>read this thread
>go outside for a cigarette
>two groups of teenage boys walk past my house on the way to school
>both groups are talking about GTA Online
It's not going anywhere.

>hurr durr modding
whatever keep defending cheaters online ruining the experience for everyone

>>381978530
honestly its the community thats to blame

why get mad at a company if they can earn more money doing less?

>Gta 4 dlcs
>entire new games
>GTA V DLCS
>online only expansions
best timeline am i right my dudes

File: 1498337689547.gif (203KB, 248x225px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 248x225px

>>381978098
>fallen from grace

???

I don't care about some autistic 10years old youtuber who could no more uses Superfags Mods into the game.

But I'm pissed about how little Rockstar cared about the Single Player in GTAV.

>>381982715
Am I The only person who, even in games like BC MW2, found modded lobbies to be fucking hilarious and fun as shit?

Like, a fucking excellent break from the same ol' same ol'

File: 11248963225-Blizzard_Entertainment_Logo.jpg (117KB, 1600x960px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1600x960px

>>381978098
Blizzard is the Lucifer of video games

>>381982510
it's not just that the thing is different, it's also that it's exploitative. The amount of content in GTA online is extremely limited compared to the monetary reward and the items you are supposed to buy with it. R* doesn't want you to play the content they design, they want you to buy shark cards so you can drive around the city in a tank and shoot people, because that's honestly mroe fun than playing a heist with mouth-breathers 20 times.

>>381978393
>>381978489
>>381978530
These are good answers.

R* fell pretty hard too though.

>>381978365
Bioware

>>381981835
More than a dozen of vehicles for each dlc, a few helicopters, an apc and a bunch of explosives. Not to mention more story and mission.

Bungie.

>>381981835
20 new vehicles and 7 new weapons in Tbogt
23 new vehicles and 6 new weapons in Lost and Damned
Cry more nigger

>>381982978
On the one hand I get that it sucks to feel like you're being coerced into spending money

On the other, we can boil this down to being upset at being made to spend money to access cars and weapons instead of being able to spend money on a car and a weapon, like in the good old days

File: 1469500048182.png (145KB, 314x371px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 314x371px

>>381978098
>BioWare
>Bethesda
>Valve
>Blizzard
>Ubisoft

Damn, you know the industry is fucked when there is an actual and hard competition for that shit.

File: 1484066439303.jpg (151KB, 500x360px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 500x360px

Everyone is still going to buy RDR2 and it'll be like this never happened. Nobody learns from their mistakes and history just repeats itself.

>>381978098
bioware

>>381981469
>publisher does stupid shit that's outside the developers control
>WOW FUCK THIS DEVELOPER
>developer tells publisher they might want to cut that shit out because it's generating tons of backlash and the publisher agrees
>WOW FUCK THIS DEVELOPER STILL IT SHOULDN'T HAVE HAPPENED IN THE FIRST PLACE

>>381980467
Online was actually fun when there were no repurcussions for using a menu. Right after the PC release in April/May/June 2015 you could do whatever you wanted without a chance of a ban.

>>381983272
Sure, but before it was 15 bucks for several guns and cars, now its 50 bucks for one

>>381979181
Try that again when Edgeworth 2 and Great Ace Attorney come out worldwide.

Blizzard

>>381978098
>Implying they fell from Grace

You'll all be back for rdr2.

And the new bully.

And the new IP.

>>381978098
I don't think they even fell... a few randoms got upset on the internet, but it didn't seem to affect the playerbase. actually playing (and possibly paying via shark cards) for the game.

But to answer your question:
Konami, 3 times.
Valve
Squaresoft
Square Enix
Bethesda/ZeniMax
Epic Megagames
Activision
Edios

The list goes on.

>>381983272
How the fuck can you not distinguish between the quality single player content rockstar used to produce and the multiplayer drivel they churn out now? How is it wrong for people to be upset when rockstar was making things people generally liked, and now they are not only apparently giving up on that, but in the same move, milking their customers for every dime they possibly can? How can you defend that?

>>381978215
watch them fuck up mvci too

>>381984457
They put in autocombos. It's already fucked

File: PS_Messages_20170608_160106.jpg (820KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

820KB, 1920x1080px

>>381979049
I got it for the price of free.

>>381980000
GTA V SP DLC is nearly done. It simply needs further development. But they are too busy making red dead 3. Plus the Online team is extremely small. Probably like 10 people are only working on GTA online.

>>381978421
Having friends to do stuff with is a sort of multiplier for content. I enjoyed GTA online more than the single player. GTA 4 single player was more fun in my opinion than the multiplayer though, but that was because there was nothing to own and no progress to make

>>381979049
>tfw you got the $8 million shark card for $30
Would buy it under no other circumstances. Even 50 is just ridiculous despite it being half price. It's hard to comprehend a $100 purchase of in game currency. At least in one go

>>381988220
>buying shark cards
Just search for a modder dropping money if you want to cheat to get money

Everyone sucks now

File: 1476526200116.png (727KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

727KB, 1024x768px

>>381978331
>REVII was okay

File: Eclipse time.gif (710KB, 140x130px) Image search: [Google]

710KB, 140x130px

>>381978098
BLIZZARD

>>381978408
GOAT for horrible ending

>>381978098
How have they fallen?
They are probably the last non-sjw company in the west

>>381988331
>>381988220
Pretty much this, Rockstar takes a dim view on money hacks and has banned people, but never the first time they've been caught unless using mod menus themselves.

Find some modder, get money buy (in order until you run out of money)
10 Car Garage wherever you want
CEO Office
Buzzard Attack Chopper
40 car Vehicle Warehouse
Crate Warehouse
Bunker + whatever buytime upgrades you want
Fully Upgrade bunker at laptop
MC Garage
Coke outfit (forget the rest)
Fully upgrade Coke outfit
Shotaro + all performance upgrades
High End Apartment
Armored Karuma

>>381988906
spot the ff14 cuck

>>381978098
Konami
Bethesda
Sega
Capcom
Blizzard

>>381979181
>Capcom is slowly redeeming themselves.
KEK

>>381988981
With all above, you can make solo (but with others in the session, always have atleast 4 players in session to defeat AI shittery)~$1.4million in just over 3 hours. (226k*2 for bunker, ~$100k*2 for Coke, 75K*12 for vehicles - I haven't even done crates, but they make dosh too)
Nothing that isn't showboating bullshit costs more than $3million, so you can in reality buy anything for ~6 hours of grind.
If you like driving, it's pretty fun too with the vehicle sales.

Buzzard is necessary early for CEO, it's a Pegasus vehicle so it noramlly costs $200 to 'summon' and you have to pick it up from an airstrip/public helipad. But if registered as a CEO and you own it - you can call it in for free and it spawns at the nearest roadway - fucking excellent for getting around the map really quick.

>>381978098
>Hating on rockstar when its obvious that Take-two is the one inflating GTA Online and killing mods

>>381978998
This. Too many retards itt
Since rockstar told take two to back off of mods, they've redeemed themselves in my eyes after the fuckup with San Andreas mods and removing a bunch of tracks from the radio.

>>381989345
Thats neat and all but its still a grind to get all these things set up

>>381989550
>Take2 even broke up gaming's biggest bromance
Sam and Leslie LOVED and NEEDED each other, THEY WERE GOING TO THE TOP TOGETHER and WITHOUT EACH OTHER THEY WERE NOTHING.

Thanks Take2.