HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN TO ME
>dev heavily shills his game here
>fucks up and reveals himself by accident
>game fails due to incompetence and failed promises
this game failing is literally boner-inducing
>>381822196
redpill me
>>381822196
>>fucks up and reveals himself by accident
no way
screencap. i honestly thought the angry strafeposting shill guy was trolling.
>>381823749
all women are souless whores who want to be choked, slapped and facefucked by chad even the feminist ones, also they will trade you for a better looking man the first chance they get
they all dream of having a dominant sugar daddy. Every single one.
>claims to be a 1996 Quake-like with infinite levels
>is modern shit with a pixel filter
dude never played the classics
>>381822196
give me whatever you've got, the quick rundown or the whole enchilada
>It's quake i swear!!
>everybody who actually played quake could see that's horseshit from 10 miles away
>stupid ass journalists who haven't played a single game that came out before 2011 eat it up like the fucking idiots they are
>blocky indie aesthetics with shit textures instead of actual quake looks
And nobody wanted that shit.
If you want something reminiscent of quake I recommend waiting for Dusk.
Soundtrack was done by the guy who did the Doom remixes for brutal doom i think
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VN1N05WmiqU
>>381824716
muh sonny jim, you wanna reuben sandwich?
Bunny hopping faggot dev
>>381821581
>start aggressively marketing your game nearly a year before it's released
>do it so hard people think there must be some ruse and it's actually a stealth sequel to an existing hit, or in any case somehow much more than you're letting on
>people get it confused and mixed up with other similar self-aware retro-shooter homage games coming out while you're doing your early marketing
>by the time of launch everyone's tuned out your aggressive marketing, many are genuinely surprised that it wasn't already out yet
>it's a simple and repetitive 6.5/10 game
That's how it happened.
>>381824817
Sonny jim, that's not funny?