>90ºC idle

File: b69.jpg (75KB, 636x464px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 636x464px

>>381747632

File: IMG_3626.jpg (29KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 600x600px

>>381747632
ITS WORTH IT FOR THE PERFORMANCE GOY

File: intel i7 7700k.jpg (510KB, 1315x794px) Image search: [Google]

510KB, 1315x794px

>>381747632
DELID THIS

File: 14624568450319.jpg (941KB, 1906x1536px) Image search: [Google]

941KB, 1906x1536px

Dumb Intel fanboys.

File: consider suicide.jpg (33KB, 840x405px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 840x405px

>buying X299
>ever

Is a Ryzen 5 1600 worth it?

>still have i5 4690k
>zero issues
who actually buys these stupid high level cpus? can't be for vidya.

>>381749934
I recently bought the 7700k because it was on sale at microcenter for 199.99.

Dungeddit, what's wrong with the new intel chips? Are they that poorly made that they just catch fire at the slightest overclock?

>>381749579
Yes.

>>381749579
No.

>>381749934
PC mustard race autismos from Reddit buy them to build "rigs" for their wifes son. Gotta install some RGB lights in there too, brother!

PC's are so fucking cringe lmfao.

File: 1480885182129.png (301KB, 465x506px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 465x506px

>>381747632

File: 1498352058538.png (330KB, 841x720px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 841x720px

>>381749579
>AMD
>video games
you buy them to mine, not expect high stable fps

File: 1492736241396.jpg (12KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 480x640px

>>381748847
Underrated

Delidding my 7700k dropped the temp by literally 30c

>>381750227
But the current AMD GPUs get higher fps than their nvidia counterparts.

File: BBC GPU.png (16KB, 622x581px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 622x581px

>>381750279
Show me the AMD GPU that gets higher FPS than a GTX 980 TI, GTX 1070, GTX 1080, GTX 1080 TI, GTX Titan Pascal, or Quadro P6000

I'll wait

>>381750113
They hacked off the igpu of the last gen and stuck it into a new socket with higher ghz basically expecting it to not explode

>>381749579
All you need to know is that when streaming and playing dota 2 at the same time a ryzen is 20% slower than a i7.

>>381750364
>counterparts
try reading

>>381750364
>reading comprehension
lmao at you weeb shill

>>381749579
Yes

File: confusion.png (4KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 500x500px

>>381750474
>But AMD GPUs get higher FPS than my arbitrarily chosen NVIDIA cards!
>what about these cards?
>N-no! AMD cards don't get more FPS than those, so they do not count!

File: 1455921121751.jpg (146KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 1200x675px

>>381750630
>showcase a 300 dollar GPU
>BUT THESE 600+ DOLLAR GPUs ARE STRONGER

File: 1497769737122.jpg (607KB, 1846x1923px) Image search: [Google]

607KB, 1846x1923px

Is there anything worse than Intelshills?

File: 1487524295124.png (667KB, 3882x2171px) Image search: [Google]

667KB, 3882x2171px

>>381750750
No need, the GTX 1060 is 4-5x cheaper than the RX 480 and outperforms it enormously.

>>381750430
>All you need to know

I can't help but feel like people really mean "All I want you to know" when they say this.

File: 1454176825666.jpg (262KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 653x726px

>>381750810
NOH SHTOP! YOU MUS DELID DIS!

>>381750364
>Show me the AMD GPU that gets higher FPS than a GTX 980 Ti
Try reading your own chart, faggot.

>>381750113
This video sums it up nicely, and it's even made by someone who has a reputation of being a bit of an Intel shill.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWFzWRoVNnE

>>381749579
The most worth-its-price CPU on the market right now, actually.

>>381751952
repill me on ryzen. I don't ever keep up on amd products. 16 cores is what intel scared of I'm assuming?

>>381752563
Yes, AMDs upcoming Ryzen Threadripper is going to have 16 cores on the flagship.

16 cores but all game devs are incompetent so enjoy those 12 sleeper cores nerds

>>381750758
Nope, they're the scum of this planet.

>>381753264


Oh yes, more cores MORE CORES for gaming
What's the matte gramps, surely aren't using 4 cores/8 threads for gaming considering that more than 95% of all games don't use more.

>b-but any year all games will magically use endless amount of cores and will be optimized for it, a-also older don't matter

>b-but muh 7zip
NOT GAMING FAGGOT

>game devs are incompetent
Hello faggot who doesn't know how programs work. It's not like we had hardware which is good at mutlithreading for YEARS now It's a GPU you faggot
But no, fags like you think that CPUS magically didn't focus on 1000 cores or some other shit. Gee it's almost like they had a different role.

File: 1454176825221.jpg (185KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 653x726px

>>381750810
WHAT THE FUCKKKKKK?!?!?!? THEY TOLD ME RX 480 WAS BETTER THAN 1060 NOWWW

DRUUUUUUUUUUUMPFFFFFFFF

>>381753431
I agree fellow amd shill, the other side shills are terrible, we are fighting the good fight XD

File: 1494233257082.png (2MB, 3072x3118px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3072x3118px

>>381749934
>have an i5 4690k
>never overclocked, didn't feel the need
>Only went on 90s a long time ago and only because I had to use stock cooler for a while, only happened during high load and made sure to never extend these high temps, switched to regular cooler master heatsink after a week and everything ran perfectly for a year later

>pc suddenly won't boot since yesterday and I'm 90% sure it's the cpu after extensive testing and swapping
What the fuck, I tought cpus were the most reliable thing

>>381749934
>who actually buys these stupid high level cpus? can't be for vidya.
If you're doing work that is CPU dependent like 3D rendering (non-gaming), video editing/rendering or other stuff like that you need something better than a 4690k. It will save you so much time it's not even funny. Just an i7 4790k would be a huge boost but some of these new CPU coming out? Holy shit man. People who 3D render are so fucking hype right now.

>>381753714
>What the fuck, I tought cpus were the most reliable thing
They are. In my experience they are literally the most reliable part in the pc.

>>381753587

Better at higher temps and power consumption. Amd trying real hard to dethrone the Nividia meme.

>>381753714

might just be your MOBO, but then again every time my mobo has died my cpu has also gone to shit.

>>381753714
How the fuck did you get in the 90's? I use a stock cooler and mine is like 40c idle and maybe 60-ish on load. Use a damn air conditioner.

>>381750758
Linus has been riding amd recently.

File: chart.png (39KB, 621x681px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 621x681px

>>381754291
Even techpowerup shills for AMD these days.
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/Radeon_RX_560_vs_GTX_1050/

>>381754797
But I remember they were called intel shills couple months back.

>>381753714
you fucked up your motherboard
post an image so I can see where you cummed thermal paste all over the board

File: intel.png (244KB, 878x756px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 878x756px

>>381755174
STOP

>>381755481
So they are only shills if they post benchmarks that show intel is superior in something?

I bought a i7-6700k a year back, am I a jew?

>>381755586
GOY! WHAT ARE YOU DOING! SUPPORTING THE INTEL JEW!
YOU NEED MORE CORES! GET RYZEN AND THREAD RIPPER!

>>381755664

B-but I got it for 150€! Isn't that a good shekel saving deal for it!?

>>381755752
NO!!!!!!!! You don't want to be a CORELET?! DELID THIS! YOU ARE MOMENTS AWAY FROM A HOUSE FIRE!

It's a very good deal I am jelly.

>>381747632
does it help with 4k gaming

>>381747632
What I want is a really powerful single-core CPU that I can use exclusively for Dwarf Fortress.

Is overheating i9 the hot new /g/ meme

I like it

File: Mayorin.jpg (38KB, 704x528px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 704x528px

>>381749203