Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
Anonymous
Mount and blade thread 2017-06-25 02:34:21 Post No. 381730092
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Mount and blade thread 2017-06-25 02:34:21 Post No. 381730092
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: MOUNT AND WHAT.jpg (83KB, 627x500px) Image search:
[Google]
83KB, 627x500px
Just got the collection for Mount and Blade. Which game should i start with, it gives me the orignal, warband and Fire shit.
>inb4 hurr durr play the first retard
people are telling me that warband is literally the same game but patched.
Help me out /v/
>>
Just play Warband.
>>
File: 1464829609225.jpg (367KB, 800x1131px) Image search:
[Google]
367KB, 800x1131px
There is no point in playing the original unless you desperatly want to play one of the few unique mods that weren't carried over to warband.
WFaS is very different and plays more like an extensive overhaul mod. Most people tend to think poorly of it but you have nothing to lose by giving it a shot. Definitely play Warband first though.
>>
>>381730369
>>381730384
thanks
>>
File: mb_warband 2016-09-23 12-59-31-13.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 1920x1080px
>>381730437
Mountainblade has a pretty good general over on /vg/ with useful info in the OP and the anons there will likely answer any questions you may have while learning the game.
>>
>>381730884
what mods are you using in this screenshot?
that desert area looks fucking great
>>
>>381731502
that's just sands of faith
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3