ITT: Flawless games
>>381713614
>Rubber banding AI
lol no
>>381713614
Yeah it's 9/10 it would be 10/10 ifthe resolution wasn't so bad that I regularly drive into oncoming traffic
Also I ordered Revenge and hope it keeps me occupied for a little while.
>inb4 people say Revenge was better
>>381716796
Revenge WAS better though
>>381716937
Here we go...
>>381716937
Objectively wrong. Traffic checking ruined the precision and thus tension that made 3 superior. Revenge was still good, but there's no question between the two.
>>381713614
The AI is shit.
I am not a fanboy, I swear
>>381713684
i was just playing today and i was able to get like 30 seconds ahead