How the hell did we go from this

>>381601812
I don´t understand remasters. There´s already the original one, why the fuck would I need a remaster? Just because muh graphics? Useless junk, give me good games that I haven´t already played.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (92KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1280x720px

to this

>>381601945
Because there's people like me who hate playing games that look like shit

>>381602061
Well, you're a retard.

File: STRETCH HIS NECK OUT JUST 4U.png (239KB, 3292x3264px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 3292x3264px

... to this?

>>381601945
Different generations

Not everyone grew up on old graphics, and some find it very unappealing

File: Boulder Dash.png (2MB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x1080px

This looks like shit according to /v/ but the sloppy animation from the remaster is perfectly okay.

>>381602163
>I don't understand
>helps you understand
>you're a retard

really makes me think

>>381601965
Indiana JONER?

>>381602061
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODS

>>381601945
its 20 years later.
its not possible to play those games on modern platforms so easily to like childs (which is main platform) childs and their family.

just stop being contrarian for sake of it.

its not like they butchered animations or graphics its fairly honorful to original releases.

>>381601945
Coco is playable and they nerfed the unnecessary difficulty of Crash 1. Plus Time Relics for all the games instead of just 3

That sounds like a logical reason to get the games to me

>>381602061
Casual

>>381603383

>Unnecessary difficulty

I 100% it when I was 12. I don't even remember it being difficult and I'm shit at games.

>>381601812
Mario 64 was better than Spyro and Crash put together. Just sayin'

>>381603701
Try it again these days. Crash 1's 100% system is pretty fucking ridiculous, having to essentially go through whole levels without dying just so you can get those Box Gems all for an ending that isn't even worth it. Not to mention not even having the Slide from Crash 2 or 3

If you're so shit at video games then you wouldn't be saying Crash 1 isn't hard

>>381603701
>and I'm shit at games.
If you 100% Crash 1 you definitely weren't shit at games, stop humble bragging. Even Naughty Dog agrees Crash 1 was too hard to be fun for most people.

>>381601945
>I don´t understand remasters

Sounds like you actually don't, because this game is in fact a remake, not a remaster.

>>381603892
If it's so good how come the emulation is so bad? Mario 64 sounds real crucial but not even nintendo fans can get n64 emulation right.

>>381604002
Not that guy but I think this is a weird mix of the two.
The fact that they recoded the whole thing would suggest it's a remake, but the aim is to make it play nearly equal to the originals like a remaster.

>>381603892
Mario fuckin sucks

>>381602061

It's nice to see someone who has just started playing video games.

>>381602359
>textures are so low-res you can see the pixels
That's pretty shit, m8.

>>381601945
Improved visuals for games that you like. Plus possibly being able to play them again after the old system breaks.

>>381604557
A remake is a remake. Plain and simple. Activision might be using the word incorrectly but it is not a remaster.

>>381604557
You're a fucking idiot.

>>381602359
Wait, why this looks like shit?
Fuck, it's bettter than I remember.

>>381605616
Because it's not the N64.

>>381603892
You're right but crash isn't bad. Fuck spyro though.

File: n64 graphics.jpg (226KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 1280x960px

>>381604816

>it's OK when Sony LITERALLY rehashes
>It's only bad when Nintendo puts Mario in a game that's vastly different, but it has Mario in the title so it's a fucking rehash.

>>381603383
Why are children such shit at games now? Have they just been babied too much?

>>381606221
kek

>>381606263
NSMB was a pretty bad "series" that probably shouldn't have been exploited as much as it was. Only DS and U are really worth playing

3D games were always original though. They clearly put more effort into those even if they never sell as well

>>381606472
You seen the streams? These people are mind-bogglingly terrible.

>>381601945
Some people can't get past a game's graphical look, like the faggot that replied to you.

>>381603383
>unnecessary difficulty
Nigga please. I 100% it as a kid. You learn the layouts, you git gud and you beat the game.

>>381606472
Only Crash 1 is unreasonable given the 100% reward and how it's set up. Crash 2 and 3 are perfectly fine, even with annoying stages like Cold Hard Crash

>>381606263

Calm the fuck down, ninten/v/

>>381601812
Was this the scariest level in Crash?

>>381606624
Right, but the 100% is to add replay value to the game. It is meant to be difficult, and that is a good thing. It is incentive for those who have beaten the game to master it.

File: Generator Room.png (653KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

653KB, 960x720px

>>381606898
No.

>>381601945
Agreed. They should have ported it to SteamOS instead so that PC mustard race can also play it, and maybe just slightly increase the graphics. The remaster feels badly optimised.

>>381602359
This has more detail, and color than anything i've seen in the remaster still.
>>381603892
64 is experimental, but jank

>>381607765
>64 is experimental
explain

>>381602359
Z. BUFFERING.

>>381603892
>baiting this hard

>>381603901
>>381603907

I guess I gotta give it another run. I remember 100% crash 1 and 2 but quit 3 because I sucked at the racing games.

>>381603383
To be fair they should have kept a challenge mode that still requires you not to die.

>>381603383
>>381603901
>>381603907
>>381608539
You know what's more cancerous than Crash 1 on 100%? Crash Bash on 200%. I never made it past 174%, at least when I was soloing.