Best Total War

>>381498196
Warhammer is pretty nice for beginners, and all-round pretty good. If not, Shogun 2 or Attila is the go-to, the last one harder than the first

>>381498417
Difficulty isn't really a factor for me (as long as it's not trying to hold my hand 24/7). I would also prefer a european version. Is there mods for any of the games you mentioned that allow you play in europe?

>>381498615
Attila is set in Europe during the great migration, and has a early medieval DLC and a nice Medieval mod (Medieval Kingdoms Total War 1212AD) which is getting a campaign part soon

>>381498902
Thanks, Anon. I'll check it out.

>shogun 2 with vac
>fall of the samurai without vac

So does FotS have it or not since I assume it still uses Shogun 2 as a base. And how likely is vac to screw you over when it comes to modding the single play game? Or better, how exactly are the game files sorted and is the multiplayer portion isolated? Is it also an always on thing for any multiplay/coop, or is it an option? Because how do multiplayer mods work?

File: Capture.png (416KB, 625x594px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 625x594px

Why is this allowed? Why isn't the titling done properly. I'm literally shaking now from how triggered I am.

Attila for melee, Fall of the Samurai for guns.

Rome 2 is okay now, especially with all the mods, so if you really prefer that setting, go for that.

CA are largely incompetent and every one of their games has some kind of major flaw. Your favourite total war will no doubt be the one set in the period you are most interested in.

bump
Interested in more recommendations. I kinda like the gunpowder periods but in medieval 2 you had to play really long before you got to that and the "world is round" event and the timurids.

File: total-war.jpg (131KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 1280x1024px

>>381498196
Best Total War is Medieval 1.

>>381502821
That shit don't exist, get out

>>381502964
what