Are the newer Obsidian games good? Sell me on them.

>>381464576
No, they aren't.

File: Tyranny 2.jpg (363KB, 1916x1074px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 1916x1074px

Nope.

Pillars is an SJW wonderland and Tyanny is a visual novel not a video game

As per usual. Obsidian cannot create good content on their own. They can only ride on the coat tails of better dev teams

>>381464576
no

>>381464823
One changed backer message does not equal SJW. I mean there's little excuse for it but that doesn't mean the entire game isn't worth playing. Do you have any other reasons?

What's wrong with Tyranny having a lot of dialogue?

>>381464968
Tyranny doesn't have a lot of dialogue. It is wholly dialogue with a shitty combat aspect tacked on. Have you ever heard the phrase "Show don't tell"? Because Obsidian clearly has not.

>>381464576

I liked Tyranny quite a lot, and it just got some DLC that expands the main campaign a little (which I think it needed). They're going to do at least one more DLC, not sure what it will provide. It's a very linear game, but with choice and consequence within that linearity.

Pillars of Eternity is much less linear, larger, more complex, but it has a reputation for being boring. Maybe it was the mood I was in, at the time, but I enjoyed it quite a lot. Though I don't think it's the best game of this type I've ever played. I much prefer Tyranny. I still think it's worth playing.

I'm in a similar boat, considering getting Torment Tides of Numenera. Haven't played it yet. Mulling over whether it's worth the price.