Shitty, overpriced remasters are okay when Nintendo does it.

Is it a shitty remaster? Any comparison screens?

>>381165714
This, Twilight Princess is my favorite in the Zelda series

>>381165714
It's really not. OP is probably just salty he was getting called out in the SotC thread since that one's getting NO new content. Twilight Princess HD actually looks pretty good and adds a fair amount of content and QoL changes. It's pretty much the definitive version of the game, especially since you can play with the Pro Controller.

>>381165714
not just that, it's just a texture pack

>>381165607
Forgot this existed desu

>>381165714
The original looked like a 2006 game, the remaster looks like a 2008 game.
It doesn't add any new content either

>>381165945
It's also in HD so it doesn't look like shit, and removes the redundancy in some sections.

>>381166040
>it doesn't add any new content either
Wrongo.
>inb4 "b-but physical DLC!" when the physical release came with the amiibo packed into it

>>381166087
>It's also in HD so it doesn't look like shit
No, it does look like shit. Its not true HD, they just brushed up the original textures.
The character models still look like complete shit.

>>381166216
It adds a challenge dungeon. Its basically the same as that 50 floor fight dungeon already in the original game, but you use Wolf Link instead. It barely qualifies as new content.
And they charge you for that shitty amiibo even if you don't want it

File: come on now.jpg (63KB, 315x332px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 315x332px

>>381166242
>Its not true HD
since when is 1080p not HD

>>381166447
Its not built from the ground up in HD. They just upressed the textures, and it looks like shit.

>>381166242
You realize when I play it on dolphin with widescreen hacks in 1080p its in "true HD" right?

Texture resolution and graffix dont magically change the definition of HD

>>381166657
Whatever, maybe my wording was wrong but the game still looks like ass.

>>381166520
You know that's what every "remaster" does, right?

>>381168395
Yeah but with most remasters they at least make it look quite a bit better. TPHD only looks marginally better than the original. Its not worth anywhere near $60

>>381165607
Well, yeah.

>>381168605
I don't know what you're talking about. Remastering is a pretty exact science. Even so, buying any remaster for $60 is a fucking waste if you already have the original.

>>381169124
I'm saying other companies put more effort into their remasters than TPHD.
TPHD was handed off to the garbage company who ported Mass Effect 3 to the Wii U, just so they could shit something out for 2016, because they knew the rest of the 2016 games were pure garbage.