https://strawpoll.com/e75adc6
What do you rate BotW /v/?
8.8
>>381160336
this
>>381159820
solid 7
Extremely playable
also extremely forgettable
probably a 9/10, might even be my favorite game of 2017
It's an 8/10 for me. The lack of any challenge put me off and it just became an exploration simulator.
>those 1s
Did anyone vote that in earnest? If so, why?
>>381161149
Because it's boring as shit. the game is nothing but run around simulator. It has some cool systems yeah, but ultimately it's a game about nothing with nothing going for it. I was going to give it a four because fucking nothing is better than downright awefull but the fact that you have to buy a switch/wii-u to play it. both absolutely garbage consoles with nothing on them brings it down.
>inb4 sonybro/microjew
Pure pcfaggotry here.
Now that Breath of the Wild has been out for a while, what do you guys expect from the next Zelda game? I think besides the common complaints of the game feeling easy and inconsequential, which are no small complaints by any means, people did seem to like managing Link's stuff and a lot of the little things like how your shield could attract a lightning strike and so on.
A lot of people also seem to have liked Link Between Worlds with the system where you rented items so you could go to any dungeon you wanted at any time, for the most part. Do you think these two could be reconciled to make a better game? Or do you have an entirely different idea in mind to make the series feel viable in the face of having several other competitors like the Witcher and Dark Souls games?
Interestingly BotW is rounding up as 8/10. /v/ bashing BotW and saying it was shit was a lie all along.
>that 7% of butthurt xbots/sonyfags