He's right and you know it
>quoting neogaf
forgot to mention: they're talking about swastikas exclusion in COD WW2 and WEWUZ nazi women
So what it doesn't change the fact that it's cowardly to exclude a historical symbol in a WW2 game if you're trying to be realistic and accurate.
>Crossing Eden
Almost as bad as Lime
And nah, I don't want to play a nazi. I just don't like people being coddled
>>381116661
> realistic and accurate
To be fair, COD pretends to be neither
>>381116304
>Unironically going to Neogaf and then posting their garbage here
You realize this makes you just as bad as /pol/ right? Actually maybe even worse because at least /pol/ isn't filled with console warring retards.
>you can only roleplay when you have flags with swastikas
No, you fucking shitters. This is solely about not to fuck with history just to sooth some pussies because they get vietnam flashbacks when they see the flags.
>>381116781
That was a good webm
thanks for posting it
>>381116728
>Almost as bad as Lime
also he's in an open relationship with his wife and her bull
People who are pissed about this are faggots.
Call of Duty always had no swastikas in multiplayer, not even the edgiest game in the series aka World At War.
The reason why there are no swastikas in multiplayer is simple and easy to understand. Certain countries have them banned.
If you have multiplayer maps with swastikas germans and several other nations won't be able to play on them at all.
'Simply replacing textures' means it's a different game client. To make everything work requires to much time and money, so it's easier to cut them from multiplayer completely.
>>381117049
/v/ needs more content like it.
>If you allow people to have fun in your video game, you're part of the problem
>>381116614
>American devs
>Call of Duty
>No swastikas
>Black women serving the airborn
>Swedish devs
>Wolfenstein and Hearts of Iron
>Swastikas absolutely everywhere all the time
>No problem showing Hitler