Is this OG Xbox vs PS2 all over again?

no
both original xbox and PS2 had games

>>381089209
>Ark 60fps
>Anything that isn't literal super computer

Pick one

File: 1497005244021.jpg (27KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 499x499px

>>381089209
>only multiplats

How hard did Xbone X lose?

>creating a console without any exclusive

>>381092453
This. If it can run ark at 60 fps 1080p then it must actually be strong as fuck. That's the most poorly optimized piece of shit game in fucking decades.

>XboneX doesn't sell
>Devs don't even bother optimising their ports anymore
Xbox vs PS2 all over again

>>381089209
These are all shit games so it doesn't really matter.

File: 1472800229026.png (328KB, 429x480px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 429x480px

>minecraft
whoa

File: 1498013476752.png (670KB, 970x723px) Image search: [Google]

670KB, 970x723px

>>381089209
No it's not. The difference is that sony had decent games back then

>>381089972
This

>>381089209
How well can it run Bloodborne though?

>>381095009
the ps4 is still shit at playing bloodborne. I won't buy it until they make a Pro patch to fix frametiming and judder.

File: IMG_3321.jpg (89KB, 476x960px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 476x960px

>>381095120
Don't buy it then

>>381095317
I won't

the sad thing is I already have a fucking ps4