Guess the Metacritic score
One.
F*cking.
Hundred.
rolling 2 last digits of my post
99, Jim Sterling exists
>>380874404
wtf i hate nintendo now
96 or 97
97
18+ site
>>380874205
94
96
Probably be 98 if there wasn't any hype.
94
People will get mad about it though
Be honest now, how many of you are going to shitpost when the Metacritic score comes out?
>>380874205
Most likely the highest possible because mario and Nintendo. Remember skyward sword?
>>380874205
Low 90s. Like 91 or 92.
>>380874205
7.8 too much red on the main character.
90
koizumi did it again, lads
>>380874205
97 meme rating
76 actual rating
90 because reviewers will complain about cultural appropriation and arbitrarily dock points.
If you didn't love 3D world you're a dick sucking faggot
score will be may last two digits
8/10
e3's PV looks not very fun
100
Greatest game ever until the next Mario or Zelda mainline game, which will get 101
>>380875373
it was a decent game, but nowhere near the actual 3D sandbox-ish mario games. The first 4 worlds are so criminally piss easy, it's insulting. It does pick up towards the end and some of the levels are amazing but compared to 64 or Galaxy 3D world stinks
>>380875373
True, I need to play it again sometime
>>380874205
Guranteed in the 90's
There hasn't been a single 3D Mario that wasn't in the 90's
Unless you want to count 64 DS which is 85
94get
95
>>380875373
I understand people's problem with the game
But the game itself is still fantastic
>>380874205
Like always, it'll be however much Nintendo can pay for.
If BotW could get to 98 (Jim Sterling being a faggot doesn't count), I believe so can Odyssey. The Galaxies have 97 after all, and this seems a revolution on par with those.
easily over 95
It's a mainline mario game so 90+ on it's brand alone
>>380876230
And another Sony shill magazine that gave BotW a 6/10 while rating No Man's Sky 9/10.
>>380874205
97 to go along with BotW
>2 game of a generations contenders in 1 year
Only nintendo.
Seriously, can you find a big flaw in this game?
The only one I can think its the showed moons are too easy to get.
But Mario always had many easy stars/shines and then some hard ones.
>>380876536
not all of Sony shill magazines do that
>>380875373
One of my favorite Mario games of all time. Hope we get another one like it at some point in the future.
>>380875676
>it was a decent game, but nowhere near the actual 3D sandbox-ish mario games
It was never meant to be in the first place, why is so hard for people to grasp? Nintendo even made an info graphic about it when they showed off Odyssey in January. Both Galaxy/2 and 3D Land/World are linear course clearing games while Sunshine was the last sandbox Mario game until Odyssey this fall.
>>380874697
When the BotW scores dropped, i went on a shitposting spree for at least 12 hours non-stop. 25 tabs of pure shitposting craziness and salt to the point it almost tasted it.
/v/ and mostly on Facebook gaming groups. The one that got me 250+ replies on facebook was a side by side pic of Breath of the wild"s score and the witcher 3's with the following text
"I thought we were the master race bros.... what happened??"
Words can not describe how much life energy the anger gave me. Seriously, i think i gained 3 years+ from the joy that day.
So, yeah, if odyssey gets a 97 as well, which is highly likely, then 2017 would have been my favorite year to shitpost about video games
>>380876778
Its not released yet you unpaid shill.
We won't know about it's problems until release day.
>>380874205
slightly less than BotW
>>380876836
Was talking about a specific one in this case, Slant. A single 6/10 needs like 40 perfect scores to compensate, it's insane how much influence a fat fuck like Sterling has on Metacritic despite having zero legitimacy as a publication.
93
98-99.
Not joking.
>>380874443
this, unless he finally dies of diabetaids
>>380877014
>>380876836
>tfw Dualshockers chose SMO trailer as the best of this E3
What a time to be alive, fellas
>>380874205
98, dropped to 97 by Jim Sterling two weeks after everyone else has already reviewed it
>>380877445
SMO?
>>380877639
Super
Mario
Odyssey
95, or 96.
There's obviously a chance for 97.
>>380877445
>The literal Sony shill editor in chief wrote a rant about how mediocre BotW was
>10/10 anyway
>Mario Odyssey wins best of show
Is Dualshockers in the middle of a coup?
>>380874443
This
Expect Sterling to give it a 5/10 for the dumbest reason imaginable
>>380877014
>you will live to see life evolve to the point where it can be sustained on shitposting alone
>>380876778
Only foreseeable issue is a lack of worlds
>>380874205
Realistically, anything 9x
No way it'll get less than 90 on average and no way it'll get 100 because at least one person will always give less.
So I'd expect anything like 92 to 96
>>380875071
This guy has literally never worked on a single bad game.
He's the John Cazale of video games.
What a man.
Well, let's see, Nintendo streamlined the fuck out of the last entry and it got endless praise. This one seems to be putting platforming back on the formula. High 80s because it's Nintendo, but with a barrage of inept fucks whining.
Who wins?
>>380874205
-83
Ironically good
104/100
min 94
max 98
>>380879415
It's great that they recognized his talents and put him in charge of all Switch development. He's never made a commercial failure either and the Switch seems to be set for success too.
>>380879415
The thing with Koizumi is that every game he works on tends to have so much fucking creativity worked in. Literally every other level has a completely unique gimmick from the one before it, and rarely resemble what he's done in previous games.
Every time I think he's run out of ideas, he introduces a new core mechanic that opens up hundreds of possibilities. That hat in Odyssey changed up my expectations entirely.
95
>>380874205
If you think this is gonna get higher than 90 you're an underaged nintenshill fuck
>>380877014
You're disgusting anon
Either 90-94 or 95-100and no, I obviously don't mean -4 or -5. Anything else would be a major surprise.
Flip a coin, if you want to bet.
>>380879931
How fucking amazing is it that the first trailer looked amazing, and then the second trailer completely redefined our expectations to be even higher? What other games could possibly pull that off?
>>380874205
>making a metacritic thread
>>380880093
The delusion is real. Even if it's not good, nostalgia will put it above 90
>>380877014
i feel like you should be banned just so you'll have the opportunity to do something else with your life
>>380880219
I want to say BoTW but I'd be really pushing it.
The thing is, I was already expecting the more open design to be enough of a change. I seriously have no fucking idea how they managed to come up with all of that and then add individual gimmicks to each area that utilize the hat. I'm honestly starting to feel like the next trailer is going to have something even crazier.
>>380878272
>>380878272
>>380878272
>>380874443
>>380877314
''The inconstant art style clash with the Mario aesthetic that has been set for years. Finally, I give Mario Odessy a 4/10. Whilst it shows what the Switch can do, the lack of short platforms and unresponsive jumps in tight situations, and forcing the player to jump to access higher grounds constantly, making the game harder as the game goes along with almost impossible jumps near the end leave a lot to be desire. Not to mention those problematic racist outfits.''
>>380880093
>>380880445
[one standard issue reply]
Use it wisely, you two.
>>380879647
Pauline. She is Mario's 1-UP girl.
It'll start at like a 99 or 98 and then drop to a 97 because of one or two reviews giving stupid reasons like 'too many moons per kingdom' as to why it sucks
98
>380880093
No 3D Mario game has ever scored below 90. Same for Zelda.
No (You) for you dumb Sonybrony