When will we get this level of detail in video games?

Do you want that level of detail? Maybe I'm violently autistic but for me the more visually realistic a game is the harder it is for me to keep focus and not be blinded by a blur of sensory overload

>single frame of Pixar movie takes 24 hours to render
>'FUCK SAKE VIDYA DEVS WHEN WILL I GET THE SAME LEVEL OF DETAIL AT 60 FRAMES A SECOND'

>>380822089
A little of this for sure.

Mario games kinda look like this already, they're just on underpowered hardware so there's a discrepancy. We can go further, I guess. Not really into it but eh.

>>380821961
Never. That movie took how many hundreds of thousands of hours to render?

>>380821961
Whenever Nintendo starts making a console that looks as high quality as that

>>380822195
keep supporting lazy gaming practices, cuck. you are what ruined the industry. we need gamergate back more than ever damn

>>380822843
I'll give you a 2/10 for that bait

>>380822843
this.

>>380821961
Never, but we will get it in a shitty simulator.

For a game, sacrifices have to be made. For a fun game, a lot of sacrifices have to be made.

>>380821961
When gaming studios get $200 million and 4 years for development

>>380821961
I for one prefer gameplay more than GRAFICS

but hey if I can have both than thats great but like I said I prefer one to the other and you should too.

When we get the hardware, probably in 4 or 5 more generations at the rate Nvidia is doing right now.

>>380821961
Well you have to keep in mind that in movies like that they render ALL of the detail ALL of the time (within that shot, obviously)

Like, a shadow on a floor 40 meters away is being rendered with the same precision as one on the main character right here up front

That's why it takes so long I'd imagine

vidya developers just have to find the right way of taking shortcuts, you know, having objects smoothly transition into lower LoDs when they reach the distance where you can't tell

But yea, sure it's possible, pretty much
It's just not economically viable

>>380821961
When third world sweatshop workers graduate from making t-shirts to making vidya assets

because rendering in real time takes a lot of processing
it's not an issue of whether or not the graphics can look that good, it's an issue of whether or not the hardware can render it stably and quickly.

>>380821961
looks like if spore was a ps4/xbone game

File: ayumi20150907.jpg (26KB, 419x235px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 419x235px

Actually music is the most important.

>>380821961

When it takes 1/60 of a second to render what currently takes several hours to render.

>>380821961
Nintendo in 2030.

>>380824283
honestly one of the only reasons Breath of the Wild was so enjoyable was because of dat soundtrack.
Why more new games don't have soundtracks like that is baffling.

File: 1493510921618.webm (3MB, 1280x536px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x536px

>tfw video games will never look like this

File: i wanna x that y.png (37KB, 321x322px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 321x322px

>>380824549

>>380823104

Eh, I think you're being too generous. The bait deserves a just 0.5/10 at best.

probably never. not because of technology but because of the time and money required. I'm sure if there was endless resources we could already make something like that, but who is going to sink that much into eyecandy when something less elaborate can do the same job?

File: 56a7eafd8be45.image.jpg (34KB, 620x374px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 620x374px

>>380824549

>>380823104
then why did you reply?

>>380825321
Troll ratings never counted as replies

>>380824283
what about gameplay

>>380824549
doesn't witcher 3 4k on max looks like this?

>>380822302
so did toy story

>>380822089
how do you go through your daily life with that autism?

>>380827515
you don't

>>380824549
They will once hardware is able to run it

File: 12432342.jpg (220KB, 1376x810px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 1376x810px

When will we get this level of detail in video games?