Are exclusives anti consumer?

kill yourself pedophile

>>380777159
No Sonybro, you can't use that excuse

>>380777159
No pcbro, sorry that valve doesnt give a shit about you anymore?

>>380777159
No Nintenbro, but since you don't have any you don't have a say in the matter

>>380777159
No Xboxbro, you have to share with Pcbro

>every company wants or can program their game for every platform

no

File: 1497340782493.gif (181KB, 383x383px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 383x383px

>>380777328
>>380777405
>>380777580
>>380777713

No, being ugly is anti consumer you ugly fuck

No, because people want exclusives.

>>380777159
Only if it's [platform I don't own] exclusive

>>380777159
Yeah, for all platforms

>>380777159
Yeah. Duh.

_ ____ __ FUCK ____ ____!

>>380777159
If it is because the platform holder has paid for its development?
No.

If a studio was paid after its development to make a multiplat exclusive instead?
Yes.

Sony funded and co-developed Bloodborne
Nintendo funded and probably co-developed Bayonetta 2
These are fine

Titanfall was money hatted to be Xbone exclusive
Games like Destiny/CoD getting exclusive treatment because of Sony making deals
These are shit

File: 1492145659995.jpg (77KB, 616x684px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 616x684px

>finally played Bloodborne years late on my brother's PS4
>I got bored of it long before I finished it

Dark Souls 2 and 3 killed any enjoyment I could have had

>>380777159
Is competition anti-consumer?

>>380779951
This is the only correct answer

File: manah.jpg (79KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1280x720px

>>380777159
Of course exclusives are good for consumers because it's easier for developers to optimize the games for only one platform.

>>380780035
That's a shame.
Playing Bloodborne after the shitshow of DS2 was an amazing breath of fresh air.

File: 1492462226937.jpg (34KB, 588x849px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 588x849px

>>380777159
Depends. Is it a given that if a game runs well on one console that it will run well on the next? If making a game exclusive to one console gives the team more resources to make that game a better experience on said console performance and feature-wise then I'd say exclusives are pro-consumer.

Corporations are anti-consumer.

>>380780675
Consumers are anti-consumer.

>>380777159
They promote console hardware.
Which promotes the company that makes the hardware to make games for that hardware.
Which promotes other companies to do the same to compete with them.
So no, they are not anti consumer.

>>380777328
>>380777405
>>380777580
>>380777713
KEK

>>380777328
>>380777405
>>380777580
>>380777713

Idort here. I demand you to delete this.