Xcom 2

They're different games.

Enemies in XCOM 2 are much stronger than enemies in XCOM 1 at comparable parts of a campaign. However, you don't have to worry about weapon fragments or shit like that, so you can afford to go much more aggressive, since you're also given a lot of QoL tools like battle scanners.

Still, I feel that XCOM 1 was a more realized game, but XCOM 2 was still pretty fun.

>>380704115
Are there many bugs in X-com 2? I remember it was really bad at launch.

i never actually finished the first one but i just bought xcom 2 i found the first one to be really hard i hope i can try harder this time

I feel that XCOM EW had a more unique and consistent aesthetic than XCOM 2. It felt like the perfect blend of modern sci-fi and classic 50's alien tropes. While it had a contemporary setting, there were definitely elements that gave it a "retro" feel such as classic saucer UFO's, "grey" aliens with enlarged heads and eyes, and comically large weapons.

XCOM 2 is by no means a bad looking game, but it felt more like a hodge-podge of cyberpunk and modern alien sci-fi than EW's unique style.

File: 1497473457829.jpg (493KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

493KB, 1920x1080px

>>380703235

EW>2>EU

Hopefully the expansion in August puts 2 on top, seems like they're adding a lot.

i actually never played enemy within is it still worth buying?

>>380703235
I think EU is of more consistent quality, with better overworld strategy, but 2 has its upsides too like the ability to conceal and wider variety in combat.

>>380707182
If you liked EU, definitely. It adds a ton of cool shit and options for your soldiers and research.
Also, I don't know for sure, but I think EW is a requirement for running Long War if you give a shit about that.

File: 1495436481757.jpg (21KB, 552x716px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 552x716px

>>380706501
what's that navy seals copypasta doing there

>>380705884
It's basically a stuttering mess.