THIS is a mario game now?

Yes, you can see Mario in the gif

>>380613034
>no feathers
DROPPED

>>380614293
dumb retard

>>380614293
This
>inb4 tards bring up that study where they found another nickel sized piece of t-rex scales and completely ignore all t-rexes closest relatives had feathers.

>>380614293
That is genuinely disappointing especially considering the widely inaccurately reported scientific paper that concluded that a Tyranosaur's plumage was probably more common with that of extant large flightless dinosaurs.

>>380614293
Name is accurate, at least

File: fd985f5b111c96c0441f55b434d0511b.jpg (135KB, 1280x572px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1280x572px

>>380614579
yeah that wouldn't looks stupid at all

File: yoshi_olympics1.webm (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

mario games always had dinosaurs

>>380614293
kinda sad they went for a "realistic" dinosaur rather than a cartoony mario dinosaur. They could have had bright feathery boys without alienating the non-autistic Jurassic World kiddies this way.

>>380614705
I don't care how cool it is. Everything media related is keeping the improper t-rex because "muh le big lizard is cool" Are we still going to be using incorrect jurassic park dinos in 100 years just because it looks cool? Are people implying feathers make everything into giant pussies and they would fight a cassowary because it's a feathered pussy?

>>380614705
Looks cooler than normal rex bro

Welcome to Jurassic Park.

File: 4695781-rawr.jpg (367KB, 2000x1251px) Image search: [Google]

367KB, 2000x1251px

>>380615017
this

File: tyrannosaurus_rex_1981_01.jpg (91KB, 400x270px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 400x270px

>>380614705
Upright dinos? That's gay I don't care how correct it is my upright tail dragging dino is the bestest.

>>380614938
wtf lmao no one wants to play as a weeb looking dinosaur. People want to play as the T-rex they saw in Jurassic Park.

>fuck weebs

>>380614837
H A H A

>>380614981

Maybe it's because, although a gigantic chicken could almost certainly kill me, they just don't look threatening.

>>380615278
Ever have a 5 pound hawk get in your face? That little thing will fuck you up. Now imagine its 4 ft tall and has claws at the end of its wings as well as its talons and beak.

>muh history needs to be accurate
then why are we still supporting isreal for a made up genocide?

>>380615496

Ok, I'm picturing it. Damn, that would look way more threatening if it was covered in scales.

>>380615183

That's just a media rex with a 2000s haircut.

Holy fuck when did people start caring about realism in Mario? Like it's a fucking dinosaur in a Mario game who gives a fuck.

You all sound like that white bitch complaining about Mario wearing a Sombrero on Twitter

File: wyrex-prep_0064_skin.jpg (106KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 800x600px

1) https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jun/03/most-dinosaurs-had-scales-not-feathers-fossil-analysis-concludes

2) http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/most-dinosaurs-were-probably-scaly-not-feathered/

3) http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/science/1.607358

4) http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/t-rex-skin-was-not-covered-feathers-study-says-180963603/

5) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/27/dinosaur-feathers-species-scales-armor_n_4508734.html

I like to think that the creative developers of SMO were like ''what do kids consider c00l?".. "OF COURSE, A FUCKING T-REX HELL YEAH, KIDS LOVE DINOSAURS''

File: remake64_dorry.jpg (247KB, 1600x1000px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1600x1000px

nudorry fags BTFO

>>380616049
No bully snek

>>380613034
Wow, I thought that Dino had a Pepsi logo on it for a second there.

File: 1494856810508.jpg (208KB, 529x1789px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 529x1789px

>autists have a heart attack because a work of fiction doesn't cater to their ideas
>reeeeeeeee trex was basically a neon colored puffball because we found feathers on some raptors! This means the trex was also covered in modern bird feathers!!!!!!

>>380614293
The fact of the matter is people tend to depict T. Rex without feathers mainly because of the Jurassic Park depiction. It's more marketable and recognizable than going with complete scientific accuracy.

>>380614293
That's right and no multi-culturalism either.

Eat shit westo.

>>380617167

I half expected it to start speaking ebonics and start dancing.

>>380616198
More knowledgeable posters already covered that. Sensational journalism to appeal to the Jurassic Park fanboys. Its a relatively small patch of skin from an area that was already thought to be feather free and large extant dinosaurs are known to not be completely covered with feathers.