Will it happen?

>>380577394
No, speaking of does anything have a 100?

>>380577454
If we're talking about movies, The Godfather and Citizen Kane both have 100. The closest a game has gotten to 100 is Ocarina of Time with a 99 metascore.

Don't count on it. Sonynegros are super madl and would not miss the chance of shooting Odissey down.

>>380577394
No, Jim Sterling will give a lower score than everybody else because he's butthurt Nintendo took his ad revenue away.

>>380577454
No, the closest game is OoT at 99.

nope

>>380577454
it just take 1 review, even a 90 among many 100s to destroy a 100

a few games had 100 early on before the reviews really started flooding in though

>>380577394
No progressive characters to satiate the narrative = automatic 1-2 points off the top
Anti-Nintendo reviewers being credited= 1-2 points off the top

max 98

>>380577601
metacritic uses floor() or int() instead of round()???

>>380577394
> racist Mexicans hats

It won't be 100, but it'll be in the high 90s at least.

>>380577394
>64 critics

You cheeky cunt.

File: SJW hates botw.png (655KB, 1001x835px) Image search: [Google]

655KB, 1001x835px

>>380577394
Honestly, even games that are perfect like Ocarina of Time and Breath of the Wild didn't get 100. A lot of critics care more about personal politics.

>>380577560
Jim sterlings videos on youtube are not monetized. Nintendo actually put ads on his videos to get money from them.

>>380577601
>a few games had 100 early on before the reviews really started flooding in though
examples? i'm gonna assume GTA IV/V was one of them

File: 5.gif (555KB, 555x555px) Image search: [Google]

555KB, 555x555px

>>380577394
If 5 it will get a 95.

File: 7.png (387KB, 695x815px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 695x815px

>>380577394
THIS TIME its guaranteed
sorry odyssey is 7.2 tops

>>380577767
Out of all of them you choose 4 & 5...

Somebody screencap and save this post. One month after the game's release when all the reviews are in Super Mario Odyssey will have a critic rating of 96.

>>380577560
>>380577601
There is too much fanboyism in gaming to pull 100.

>>380577882
They may not be my favorite games in the series but they have the highest Metacritic scores of this gen and last gen.

>>380577882
Because those 2 have the highest metascore of all GTA games and therefore it's very likely that they used to be 100 at some point? I hope this is bait faggot.

Completely ignoring its actual quality, thats pretty much impossible to achieve. We just need one reviewer giving it 9/10, which translates to 90 in metacritic, which then results in the average being under 100.

>>380577735
A 100 is unrealistic though.

People have this conception that a 10/10 literally means "it could not possibly do anything in any way better than it did", leading them to never actually give one out.

Which kinda makes the 10/10 option useless.
In combination with the "5/10 means it's garbage" attitude, most critics work on a scale of six to nine, except when they give something a 4/10 to prove a point.
1/10 and 4/10 basically are the same thing except 4/10 makes you appear more grounded.

>>380577882
gta3 wasn't hyped enough yet to get a steady stream of perfect reviews right at the start

It's pretty much impossible to get a 100 these days due to how many reviewers there are. All it takes is one to fuck it up. OoT is only at a 99 because it only has like 15 reviews attached to it.

I'm betting a 96.

>>380577394

Calling it now, it'll be a 95.

It looks like it could be a lot harder than previous entries. The life meter only allows for 3 hits, and coins don't replenish it. There will be a few ass pained reviewers that find it too hard, and cunts like Jim Sterling will rate it lower because he loves the attention.

>>380577394
as long as some contrarians exist like Jim Cuck and their "opinion" is taken into account, it wont

>>380577394
No because people get more money by going against the grain regardless if its true

>>380577394
probably. It IS going to be the perfect video game, after all.

File: 1494778609016.png (2MB, 1065x902px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1065x902px

>>380577394
That game looks like putrid garbage, so no.

>>380577735
>A lot of critics care more about personal politics.
thats cause what vidya call "reviews" is nothing more than glorified opinions and are incredible subjectives.
there are not any industry wide standard for what to test/ look out/ see / compare in a game in a genre to give it a proper score and that score hold its ground against same games on the same genre

>>380579238
>there are not any industry wide standard for what to test/ look out/ see / compare in a game
No, but giving a game bad scores because it's "difficult" or "not enough black people" is plain retarded.

>>380577394
This is going to sound really petty but I just can't get over the fact that it's 720p. It's fucking 2017, how is this considered acceptable? I feel like even if it were perfect in all other aspects I'd have to knock off a couple of points just for that.

>>380579447
>720p
Is that the docked resolution? What res does it run at in handheld mode?

>>380579529
360p

>>380577394
>kiddie shit
>100
never

>>380579447
nice assource

>>380577394
I am biologically incapable of caring.

>>380579572
this better be a joke

>>380579632
it is

it's actually 240p

>>380579529
200p
the title is a reference to magnavox's old console as a callback to classics

Anyone else worried that the stages they shown at e3 barely included any actual platforming? Don't get me wrong, possessing random objects with the hat looked fun and the side puzzles are as creative as ever but so far I didn't saw anything that would require swift reflexes like in the previous Mario games.

The lack of classic power ups is also a turn off. Ironic that this games theme song is called "1 Up Girl" when the devs ditched the green shrooms for essentially unlimited lives (coins).

>>380579447
Well, consoles in general didnt even have 1080p until recently, so i dont see the problem, especially if you are a console only player and dont even know what actual resolutions and fps are.

>>380579827
I'm not going to judge the game based off the E3 demo. People said similar things about BotW and look how that turned out. It's for the better anyways.

No, won't even get close to Galaxy.

>>380577394
No, but i honestly can't see it getting less than a 95. Reception of the E3 demo is already overwhelmingly positive.

Splatoon 2 was 720p during the test but confirmed 1080p 60fps during this E3.

>>380577394
Should be a 130 if BotW is a 98.

Super Mario 64 has a 94 and this doesn't look like it can dethrone the king, so no.

>>380579238
no, its because games reviews are unprofessional made by uncompetent people who never worked a day in their life

>>380579447
No way. Gonna need source on that.

>>380580442
facts dont need evidence

>>380577560
Mad that BOTW got a reasonable review.

>>380579827
>barely included any actual platforming
people wanted a 64/sunshine sequel and thats what they got

>>380579632
You're retarded if you actually believe that.

It's actually 144p

doubt it, a lot of reviewers suck at playing video games, it's probably going to get 7-8 while shit like the new life is strange gets a 10 cause easy to "play"

>>380577394
no, it's gonna be 111.

File: 1494168813224.png (2MB, 2512x1344px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2512x1344px

Not when cucks like this still exist. All because they wanted internet money.

Even a 99 is basically impossible in today's climate. One retard like Sterling with a 7/10 needs 30 perfect scores to compensate.

>>380579827
>barely
That seems sort of hyperbolic. There's the two rooftop challenges in New Donk, plus the mural content, plus the whole girders segment of the forest

No game will ever get 100 because there will always be contrarians or reviewers posting a low score for publicity.

what if its not my cup of tea?

>>380577560
He doesn't put ads on the Jimquisition episodes, and thejimquisition.com is adfree.

Last I checked, he was the world's only Nintendo fan.

>implying some people won't pull the score down to 97 because they give the game a 5/10 to lure more people to their review

File: 1432750363970.gif (259KB, 425x425px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 425x425px

>>380581129
>people tell Jim to talk about how Horizon fans were metabombing Zelda user scores
>Jim does some research and only finds the opposite to be true

These people sure do get pissed when one man who liked Horizon also liked Zelda but just not as much. The guy who made this image could've been enjoying more Zelda than being an autistic nutjob.

No because contrarian faggots will give it low ratings to get views on their shit-tier vidya """""""journalism""""""" website.
It'll probably be great, but the internet is needlessly contrarian to generate views and raging fanboys.

>>380582783
>people display bias and tell a man to do a thing to suit their bias while that man has an opposite bias and does an opposite bias thing
what a shocker

>>380582871
What bias does Jim have again? Is he looking to stomp on everything you love about BotW?

I will never understand people who say that he's just out to get Nintendo. He gave MK8D a 9/10 recently, and he's the only guy I know who said that Nintendo's E3 showcase in 2015 was the best.

>>380583186
he is an attention whore, not a nintendo hater, so stop talking about this faggot please

>>380583387
Howso? Because his opinions don't match up to your own? How scandalous.

do the ps4 or xbone have any games that run at 1080p?

File: 1444494019365.jpg (132KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 600x600px

>>380581129
>There are people this analpained at Jim not sucking BotW's dick and for having a different opinion to other people.
If he had given it a garbage score, I would understand but this shit is pathetic.

>>380583653
Yakuza 0 on the PS4 is native 1080p at 60fps

>>380580531
Somehow his review is the only one that counts, because he's a youtuber outside of the publishing sphere, yet you all ignore similar youtubers like ProJared who gave the game a 10/10. He's been critical of Nintendo too.

>>380583875
Makes sense, it looks like a ps3 game.

>>380577394
No.
It is also looked very boring, slow, empty and unpolished in treehouse demo.

>>380583491
Not him, but Jim should be ignored because he comes with conspiracy theories and presents them as proven facts IE: artificial shortages.

File: really.... makes... you.... think.png (22KB, 1298x159px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 1298x159px

>>380583186
>What bias does Jim have again?
He hates Nintendo

>>380583186
>botw is bad
>nintendo's 2015 e3 display is good
all this proves is that he's an attention whore that scores on being a contrarian and whose opinions should be promptly disregarded

>>380577394
No, media hate nintendo. Paid or snowflake who wants to deliberately cause shit for their 15 mins youtube/journos will tank the score exactly like they did with BotW.

>>380583186
When the rest of the world gives the game a 10/10 and he gives it a 7, why should I believe him? How come one with a different opinion on the game is regarded with being the only one truthful on said game?

He's a fucking attention whore that's why, and the only ones defending him are Sonygros riding his anti-nintendo train.

>>380584060
>it looks like a ps3 game.
It IS a PS3 game. It's no wonder that the PS3 ports are the only stable running games on the PS4.

It'll be good but Zelda seems to have the more nostalgia driven fans, who also happen to be game reviewers. I've heard the motion controls were shit and Mario's mobility is still limited compared to 64 and Sunshine.

I'm expecting a 93-96

>>380584206
Looking at those ElAnalistadeBits comparison videos, I can't believe how anyone would put Horizon over BotW.

>>380581804
Don't forget the section in the sand land where you're on the high rise moving platforms dodging the laser beams.

>>380584448
>Mario's mobility is still limited compared to 64 and Sunshine.
This speedrunner is happy with it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27SWKUt_Cus

File: 1496509823682.gif (52KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 200x200px

He also gave one of the best Mario Karts a 5/10.
>Jim Sterling of Destructoid gave the game a 5/10, stating that "sticking to tradition has not worked in Nintendo's favor" and saying the new glider and underwater sections "exist to provide the illusion of variety rather than actually altering the core experience"

>>380584418
Because people have different opinions? Not even all that different of an opinion. The guy said he liked the game, he just didn't like it as much as all those people. But so many guys lost their shit because he didn't like it enough.

Also, and I don't wanna throw conspiracy on the pile, but Jim wasn't threatened with a potential blacklist either. I remember that one guy at IGN who gave the Switch a score of a 6.9 out of 10. I remember when he got fired shortly after too.

>>380577394
Of course not. Jim "Sony" Sterling will give it 30 less points than the average, bringing down the score.

>>380584060
it _is_ a ps3 game

>>380577394
Not happening with contrarians such as jim cuck stearling or sony cock socking media giving 7.0

File: 53122131.jpg (167KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 1366x768px

>>380584715
How tragic. BotW went from an amazing 98/100 to an abysmal 97/100. Now the jocks at my school will never let me live down the fact that my baby game didn't score any higher than NFL 2K1 or Tony Hawk Pro Skater 2.

>>380578086
sadly, you're right.

File: O5vj6wE.gif (2MB, 400x206px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x206px

>>380584690
>because he didn't like it enough.
No, because people hate contrarians, you fucking retard

>>380584928
How is he contrarian though? He liked it and said it was good, same as everyone else.

>>380584690
I don't care actually that he has a different opinion on the game, the only thing I have a problem with is many jumping on the bandwagon and claiming that Jim's opinion only counts, because he is the only one speaking the truth supposedly, yet we have many youtubers in his similar position, who have been critical of Nintendo and still gave the game a 10/10. Somehow those people don't count.

And yeah, it IS a conspiracy. Same way Jim claims that Nintendo is purposefully holding back stock. It is all nonsense, same way with the blacklisting.

>>380578168
Probably because the hype culture wasn't nearly as developed as it is now.

>>380584690
Different opinions backed up by an already known bias (PIRATE ALL NINTENDO GAMES RIGHT NOW!) and footage purposefully prepared to make the game look shittier than it is, as his video shows that a weapon can break after 2-3 hits which is literally impossible unless he already used it elsewhere before the fight, proving he's either an idiot for not understanding that or a dishonest fat fuck

And that's ignoring the later crap about how "Zelda/Nintendo fans are literally evil, poor me and poor Horizon"

>I remember that one guy at IGN who gave the Switch a score of a 6.9 out of 10. I remember when he got fired shortly after too.
Oh fuck off

>>380584649

But he's right, though. If you've played one Mario Kart, you've played em all except Double Dash. That one had a twist. And the glider/underwater/hovercraft sections in Mario Karts are just dressing with no tangible effect on gameplay.

the depth and intricacies of the story and game design will go over a few heads and they wont care because its a "kids" game.

>>380584996
>he said he liked it
Oh my god, just stop. Why would you even for a second believe anything a liar has to say?

>>380584448
>t and Mario's mobility is still limited compared to 64 and Sunshine.


Where have you heard this? The only guy who tested it extensively said its on par with sunshine, its basically Mario 64 tier controls without the abusive glitching / unintended tricks, but with the addition of new moves

>>380584030
I am surprised that Projared gave the game that score because he usually hates popular things.

File: 1307344554708.jpg (20KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 300x300px

>>380577394
Of course it will happen. Critics are either shills or americans, so.

File: dan.png (219KB, 365x346px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 365x346px

>>380585167
>people with different opinions from the majority are just liars

This is starting to get out of hand, dude. Calm your ass.

>let Super Mario Odyssey get hyped beyond belief
>when it inevitably doesn't reach the perpetual hype machine madness it will be seen as a failure in the eyes of /v/
Yesssss...

>>380585096
The point of going underwater wasn´t a change of gameplay but aesthetic

no because jim sterling

>>380585313
thats what they said about zelda, and it lived up to the hype

File: 1484095910864.jpg (25KB, 336x331px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 336x331px

>>380585293
>a known liar doesn't lie, duh, he just has a different opinion

>>380585195
Is this about MGR? I already told you, that's just baby's first spectacle fighter.

Is this a fucking joke? It's the same Mario shit as 30 years ago just with better graphics.

shouldn't be above 80. It's for literal 5 year olds.

>>380577394
it will have 96 out of 100

>>380579827
The people playing suck dick anyways so it's hard to tell what the games like

File: 1388106942923.gif (1MB, 260x195px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 260x195px

>>380585027
I still don't see this bias people are talking about, not when this guy has on multiple occasions defended the company, as recently as MK8 for one thing. Everybody was bitching about how literal babies can play it with no skill needed to have a good time, and Jim praised Nintendo for being all-inclusive.

I think what you mistake for bias and begrudging attacks is just a guy who understands that these companies aren't our friends and is willing and able to call them out on their bullshit, and just as willing to point out when they do well if they manage it.

>>380585773
So if a contarrian doesn't always attack a company that means he's credible? Fucking kek

File: s4dTtBy.jpg (86KB, 384x313px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 384x313px

>>380585773
I guess. I still think his BotW review is bullcrap, agendas or not

>>380585773
>be broken clock
>be right twice a day
>????

>>380583491

fuck up jim you fat cuck

>>380585508
Im sure you love uncharted. You are so mature and want games in your movies.

Fuck off, your taste sucks.

>>380585773
you are a very special anon

>>380585773
>Horizon gets sold early and streamed
>Everyone is laughing at the garbage animation and cutscenes
>Sony starts copyright claiming videos
>YES THANK YOU BASED SONY YOU IDIOTS SHOULD BE WAITING FOR REAL REVIEWS TO TELL YOU WHAT TO THINK
>Nintendo uses the Youtube content ID system for its intended purpose
>WTF NO NINTENDO IS THE WORST COMPANY IN THE WORLD AND YOU SHOULD ALL PIRATE THEIR GAMES
Gee I wonder why anyone would call him a shill and a hypocrite?

>>380577394
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGQHQc_3ycE
HERE WE GO

pls help I can't stop listening to it

File: fog area.webm (2MB, 896x500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 896x500px

>>380586961
what are you even implying? Nobody was "laughing" at the HZD early stream, people were wowed by its impressive ultra-HD visuals and breathtaking scenery and amazing levels of detail and environment crafting. The gameplay stream really showed how amazing the game looked

if you can put mario in a t-shirt and fedora i see no reason why it wouldn't get a 100

File: 1417831966377.png (77KB, 349x335px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 349x335px

>>380586961
I don't remember any issue with Horizon getting videos taken down. But even if I am remembering incorrectly...

>gets sold early and streamed

Okay. How is showing off the game in its entirety before street the same thing as posting 30 seconds of trailer footage long after the game in question is already out in the wild? How is potential spoiling of unreleased content on the same level as what equates to free advertising?

File: jimSterling.jpg (97KB, 450x243px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 450x243px

*blocks your 100*

>>380587435
I'm just waiting for him to give it a 2/10 so that everyone has a justifiable reason to fuck him over

>>380577735
>Perfect
Die

>>380577524
As long as it has NINTENDO stamped on it, Nintenkiddies will eat up and over rate whatever dingleberry Nintendo leaves hanging from their ass

>>380587345
Either companies retain copyright on gameplay videos or they don't. Stop licking cum from your wife's face Jim and pick one.

So is Odyssey an RPG?

File: cuck.png (425KB, 846x435px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 846x435px

>>380577394
um no sweetie...

>>380589560
Yes, you play the role of Mario.

File: 1410090495344.png (277KB, 396x307px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 396x307px

>>380586961
>Sony starts copyright claiming videos
>YES THANK YOU BASED SONY YOU IDIOTS SHOULD BE WAITING FOR REAL REVIEWS TO TELL YOU WHAT TO THINK

Well, this post isn't bias, especially since you skipped the part where Jim has called out Sony for copyright claims.

https://youtu.be/9w2RMBrmTsk?t=9m5s

And don't worry. You can click on the video without worry of giving him your virtual pennies since there isn't any ads. Besides, even if there were, you DO have adblock right?

>>380587435
He even looks like a fucking fedora.

Why do people care about games being "denied" a 100 MC? Think about what it actually means. No game is entitled to have EVERY SINGLE CRITIC say it's a flawless masterpiece that changed their life, that's just fucking unlikely.

100 on a scale from 1-100 equals perfect and perfect games don't exist.

>>380584512
So you didn't actually play the games?

not if jim sterling has anything to do with it

>>380586961
>Everyone is laughing at the garbage animation and cutscenes
Only on /v/ really, I don't think I've seen that mentioned anywhere else.

File: 3XYe6Ow.jpg (117KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1200x675px

>>380592343

>>380577524
just as they did with Breath of the Wild

>>380577560
>>380577757
This. Jim only uses patreon you dumb faggot.

>>380577394
No, because contrarians will give it a low score JUST to keep this from happening.

>>380592669
I did. The video comparisons are absolutely true. Physics in BotW are better, plain and simple.

that moment when GOTY 2017 will be either Mario Odyssey or Zelda BOTW, 2 Nintendo games

>>380597158
I must say, it's nice to see Mario and Zelda back at the top of video games. It's a reminder of why they have the reputation they have in the first place.

ITT: "How dare those dastardly reviewers give a less than perfect score in a completely subjective system. These people should be drawn and quartered for not finding Nintendo games perfect".

File: 1481743656699.jpg (108KB, 604x522px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 604x522px

>>380588620

>>380577394
Not with Unreal Engine, no

>>380577394
One Sony fan will bring it down

File: 2.jpg (111KB, 1024x517px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1024x517px

>>380577394
Only Mario + Rabbids Kingdom Battle deserves that high

>>380598378
Im quite surprised on how the game looks
i might have to get it.

>>380582783
His complaint about the Blood Moon was the stupidest shit though.

>>380584649
That was the Wii one right? I think most Mario Kart fans agreed that it was one of the weaker titles in the series. Still not 5 out of 10 bad though, more like a 7 or so.

>>380599701
Mario Kart 7.

>>380599701
Mario Kart 7 3DS

>>380577394
Only if Jim sterling dies from obesity

>>380598685
shill

It cant possibly get a 100 because Jim Sterling will intentionally give it a low enough review to drop the score. This is why youtubers should not be included in the meta score.

>>380584512

remind me again why this fat fuck is recognized as a "critic"? what fucking rights does he have aside from an autistic site and millions of dollars in donations? what gives me the same credentials as, say, gamespot? he is a literal nobody

>>380601094
There seriously needs to be some higher standard to be recognized as a critic than "has a youtube channel." At the bare minimum you should have to write articles that are published on a review site or in a magazine.

>>380577524
Nintendo games are severely overrated most of the time. BOTW wasn't near deserving of its score.

>>380577735
BotW has more flaws than I can count with a hand.
It's far from perfect.

>>380601708
>>380601762
Was BotW deserving of a 70?

>>380577524
Nah bro, I'll shit post and berate that fake Zelda game all day but Oddessy looks amazing. I'd say it will deserve the universal acclaim unlike BotW.

File: 1497463925645.png (2MB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1680x1050px

>>380580531
BULLSHIT. BotW is not overrated in the slightest. Other games are so they HAD tog ive BotW such scores. How could you give BotW a 7 or 8 when Horizon and even fucking Uncharted or Nintendogs get 10/10s?

Or this Mario Kart 8 trash.

Jim Sterling is a mentally retarded retard. Look at how fat he is and you know he is stupid as fuck.

>>380601820
I would say it's a solid 8/10.
I'd still rank it lower than both Twilight Princess and Wind Waker.
Game is a step forward in many ways, but a step backward in many others.

>>380601951
>Jim Sterling is a mentally retarded retard. Look at how fat he is and you know he is stupid as fuck.
Were there ever any overweight geniuses or people who invented something?

File: chrome_2017-06-15_11-26-50.png (126KB, 1173x237px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1173x237px

>>380579574

>>380577394
Mario is fucking stupid, you giant babies.

>>380602029
Sterling didn't give it an 80 my friend he gave it a 70. That's a pretty huge gap, so you agree with me his review was shit.

>>380602053
Steve Wozniak maybe?

>>380602053
motherfucking johann sebastian bach

>>380601678
Not to defend fatty but he does post written reviews regularly on his website, including the Zelda review in question.

>>380602129
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion m8.
If he wants to give the gave a 70 then he has the right to do it, he may have had more issue with the game's flaws than I did.

>>380602201
>musicians

Seriously tho i can only think of fat musicians and statesman

>>380577757
>Jim sterlings videos on youtube are not monetized.
He's still technically marketing himself and the more he puts out videos, the more money on his patreon he makes therefore yes he does receive monetary value in response to his videos.

>>380602029
You cannot give Zelda BotW a 7 or 8 when you give Darksiders Warmastered Edition a 10 which is what he did.

Stop being autistic and see the whole picture.

>>380602259
>on his website
I'm not talking about personal websites but dedicated review websites. Something like IGN for example. My whole point is it cant just be a one man operation. There need to be editors, managers, etc. Having single people run their own reviews allows for a lot of bias and nonsense.

>>380602175
What did he do that's so great for humanity besides being a fat NEET, though? I don't know.

>>380602502
You asked for inventors not nobel prizes.

Its amazing how bittblasted one guys opinion on the internet made and continues to make people.

>>380602496
>Having single people run their own reviews allows for a lot of bias and nonsense.
>implying review sites like IGN and Kotaku don't have a lot of bias and nonsense

>>380602259
The point of critic reviews is to have publications with editorial oversight and accountability. Sterling is just a fat fuck with a blog, he gets to share the user reviews with all the other fat fucks of the world.

>>380602312
bach was more than just a musician and you would do well to realize that brilliance is more than just analytical or mechanical skill

File: 34634tdrt3546.jpg (18KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 499x499px

>>380577394

Not if Jim Sterling does a review and he certainly will.

>>380584649
The same year, he also gave MW3 a 9/10 for being more of the same.

>>380602572
It's not his opinion. It's the fact that this fat cuckold
1.Is somehow considered a critic for making awful youtube videos
2.Is super butthurt at a company for not letting him profit off of their content
3.Tells people to steal their content because he cant profit off it
4.Then intentionally drops the review score of a game purely because he cant profit off their content

We already have zero respect for "youtubers" but the ones who are as selfish and entitled as that somehow drop that respect lower. Nintendo put in 5 years, hundreds of millions of dollars, hundreds of employees into making their most ambitious game ever, and this fat faggot comes along and takes a dump on it because they wont let him make money off it.

File: Reviews are a fuckin joke.png (75KB, 1307x472px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1307x472px

>>380577394
>100 total

good luck with that

>>380596953
botw is trash anon, stop defending last gen trash.

File: dogs at work.jpg (90KB, 539x695px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 539x695px

>>380592845
> ouch what is this low resolution?
> switch screenshot

every time

File: avgn_rage_by_hanmolo05.jpg (103KB, 450x337px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 450x337px

>>380577394
>set in human world
It will get 60/100 just because it will remind people of that Sonic game.

>>380577394
Not as long as Jim walks your green earth

>>380603273
>its not possible for someone to enjoy Horizon more than Zelda
>with that shitty weapon system and pointless quests with same monsters over and over again

Perhaps it require more othher than to be a mindless Zelda fanboy in order to give this game a higher score?

>>380604096
Sorry not everyone is an autist

>>380604334
Sounds exactly like horizon, except horizon weapon's system is even shittier as both melee and ranged attacks sucks ass

Are you the fanboy here anon?

Why is it bad when Sonyfags bring a score down, but okay when Nintendofags spam 100s?

>>380604334
bait

>>380603527
>it-its trash I swear
People are sure getting desperate these days

>>380604461
>why is it bad when sonyfags do this thing, but good when nintendofags do this totally different thing

>>380604461
Both are bad. When you look at user scores block out all zeros and tens

There's always one guy who disagrees with the consensus just to get clicks.

>>380577394
Jim Sterling was right

File: 1496778806970.jpg (77KB, 444x467px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 444x467px

>>380577394
>bing bing wahoo
>100

File: varg-vikernes.jpg (45KB, 700x467px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 700x467px

>>380577394
No way. Mario fans aren't as eager to tear people to shreds over a 9.3 as Zelda's huge crossover between autists and normalfags.

Additionaly, who cares? Stop posting metacritic threads. They are serious cancer.