HEY KID WANT TO BUY WORLD AT WAR AGAIN?

ITS JUST LIKE ALL THOSE OLD GAMES YOU PLAYED BUT NOW WITH WOMEN AND BLACKS

Yes, yes I do.

>>380387337
>implying that's a bad thing
Have you seen the more recent call of duty's?

call of duty 3 you retard, that was the one with vehicles in multiplayer

>>380387460
So it's actually somewhat different instead of being Generic WW2 FPS 69?

>>380387810
world at war had tanks in mp

>>380387810
CoD3 aka the one that no one played

>>380387993
It's generic ww2 fps 69 with women and blacks also with fewer weapons than waw

W@W was fantastic outside of the multiplayer tanks. Too bad Sledgehammer games is doing this one. Maybe next year we'll get another good CoD

*minus the swastikas and actual portrayal of nazis

>>380387337
I would love to play a polished W@W

>>380387691
yeah they were a nice change of pace
I mean not as good of a movement system as titan fall but Infinite War's gameplay was pretty good, not to mention the campaign that AW should have had was the best one since MW3, thank you High Moon.

>>380387337
Yes but theres no pacific campaign so why even bother

File: 1344211241177.jpg (26KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 400x300px

>multiplayer reveal looked good
>still know the maps will be the size of a shoebox with 3 lane corridor MLG horseshit

I just want big maps that aren't Battlefield.

>>380388013
so did cod 3 fag

>>380388938
>multiplayer reveal looked good
>literally worse than WaW???