>no feathers Dropped.

http://www.baka.com.au/technology/sci-tech/tyrannosaurus-rex-had-scaly-skin-and-wasnt-covered-in-feathers-new-study-says-20170607-gwm3pw.html

>shaking my head

>>380384243
The filter changed Sydney Morning Herald to Baka because it was abbreviated

>>380384434
smhtbh

>>380384243
The reputable source of baka.com

File: DB0s2iTXYAIq0Tu.jpg orig.jpg (622KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

622KB, 2048x1536px

>>380384243
SQUAWK

File: serveimage.jpg (32KB, 916x546px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 916x546px

>>380383931
Not dropped but disappointed.

Saying dinosaurs have no feathers is like saying ALL cats look like pic related

File: 1496979129685.jpg (152KB, 1006x921px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1006x921px

>>380383931
They're dinosaurs from Marios world, not ours. It's okay for them to not have feathers.

>>380383931
Feathers on Dinosaurs are lame and i dont care what the science says.

If we are accepting people with pretend genders these days then im only accepting Dino's without feathers.

>>380386514
The moment I accept that massive fag shit is the day i die

>>380384243
>>380384434
If you read the actual study you'd know that it doesn't change anything and they were still feathered, news organizations just like to senasionalize shit

>>380383931
They had to use the DNA from other animals to fill in the gaps, otherwise they'd look drastically different

>>380386307
no but some cats look like this so why not dino?
shove ur autism back in there

>>380383931
>retards bitching about no feathers before sensible people bitching about no lips
Called it.

File: 1475637603714.png (404KB, 506x621px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 506x621px

>>380388716
You do know sphynx cats don't appear naturally in the wild right? They were bred by man to be hairless.

File: babboom.png (126KB, 689x460px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 689x460px

>>380386307
Yeah, and this is what a baboon would look like if we only had fossils to go from. It works both ways.

T-Rex has enough scale impressions to where it seems unlikely that it's feathered.

>>380384243
>>380384434
Hahahahahahahaha

technically their feathers are treated more like mohawks

File: 1496243254032.jpg (81KB, 737x621px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 737x621px

>>380383931
>find less than ten dino fossils with feathers between hundreds without
>now every dino needs to have feathers

>>380388159
that's wrong though

>>380389228
elephants are pretty freaky too from fossils alone

>>380386421
they arent from marios world though

File: MHW-Anjanath_Screenshot_002.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>380383931
SCALES OR FEATHERS?
SONY OR NINTENDO?
WEST OR EAST?
MAKE YOUR CHOICE!

File: 1495657276813.jpg (131KB, 334x413px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 334x413px

>>380384243
>Not reading the actual study
>That scale impression was known years ago and didn't do shit to harm the idea of feathered dinosaurs
>The scale likely came from either the tail or the legs which scientists agree were scaled regardless of feathers or not.
Eat all the shit

File: 391075244-alpine-chough-dolomites-stone-looking-at-camera.jpg (30KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 960x540px

AYO
*sits on powerline*
HOL UP
*shits all over parked car*
SO YOU BE SAYIN
*slams head into tree trunk*
THAT WE WUZ
*runs into glass window*
DINOSAURS N SHEEIT?
*gets killed by housecat*

>>380393625
>Bell and his colleagues examined skin from T. rex and four relatives from fairly late in tyrannosaur history: Albertosaurus, Daspletosaurus, Gorgosaurus and Tarbosaurus. Tyrannosaur skin is rare, Bell said, in part because paleontologists historically favored smashing through skin to get to bones.

>From these skin patches, representing the tyrannosaur abdomen, chest, pelvis, neck and tail, the researchers found nothing but scales. If feathers existed, they did so only along the animals' back or spines.

featherfags btfo

>>380383931
there better be little gomba sized raptors in that level

>>380389228
Fat.
Real life animals are fat.
Someone should draw a fat dinosaur.

File: vnx4pwlbst2z.jpg (45KB, 700x540px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 700x540px

>>380383931
Even if some dinos were covered in feathers it looks gay as fuck.
In a fantasy game they shouldn't put realism before aesthetics.

File: 1496432391638.png (668KB, 665x700px) Image search: [Google]

668KB, 665x700px

>>380384434
that is the funniest shit I have read all week

>>380397294
why have so many pictures of dogs pooping been posted lately

File: svlhlvdpapuy.jpg (81KB, 616x960px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 616x960px

>>380397747
That was probably me, though that is funny as fuck if other anons have started too.

>>380397294
Featherless dinosaurs are monochromatic and boring.

File: Blink.gif (2MB, 500x382px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x382px

So Godzilla should be feathered?

>>380400176
godzilla is an iguana you fucking tard

File: IMG_5525.png (54KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 250x250px

Tyrantrum looks cool

File: C9z3ip1UQAIO-Kj.jpg orig.jpg (1020KB, 3376x6000px) Image search: [Google]

1020KB, 3376x6000px

>>380400330
You're an iguana

File: Godzilla origin.jpg (154KB, 587x768px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 587x768px

>>380400330
>1954 Godzilla: Was an underwater reptile that was the last of it's herd and mutated by the atom bomb which killed it's family.
>Showa: An underwater reptile from the Jurassic that has gills on the front of his neck.
>Heisei: A fucking straight up dinosaur
>1998: Iguana
>1999: Same as 1954
>2000: Same as 1954
>2001: IS 1954
>2002: Same as 1954
>2004: IS 1954
>2014: An underwater marine reptile from before the dinosaurs evolved.
>2016: An underwater marine reptile from before the dinosaurs evolved.

All based on DINOSAURS.

>>380388227
Based anon

>>380396479

Some guy drew an art book of dinosaurs with floppy skin and stuff. It was pretty cool.

File: 1445695675422.jpg (25KB, 321x322px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 321x322px

>>380400651

>>380400418
why is tyrantrum so perfect
what went right

File: 1488474090687.jpg (19KB, 272x272px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 272x272px

>>380384434
Fuck me I laughed out loud

File: spring 14.png (201KB, 443x397px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 443x397px

>>380384434

>>380388159
But that's not true at all.

File: 1497405007079.png (50KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 657x527px

>>380383931
FROG GENES YOU FUCKING RETARD

>>380383931
test

baka

File: 1495847588361.jpg (360KB, 710x508px) Image search: [Google]

360KB, 710x508px

>>380396479
>want to see this
>look up fat dinosaur
>instantly greeted with a slew of deviantart fetish shit

File: image.jpg (46KB, 1237x645px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 1237x645px

>>380383931
I don't really care, but
>People still think giant turkeys didn't have feathers

Why isn't the T. rex in the same style as yoshi? Aren't they both dinosaurs?

The inconsistent design flares up my autism

File: main-qimg-d23439d799ce69e3eaf7e350da6d20f4[1].png (153KB, 500x401px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 500x401px

>>380393180

Found this one

Does anyone have the pictures of those feathery raptors? Those looked pretty cool and were an aesthetic improvement in comparison to the t-rex. Although I remember seeing really badass feathered t-rex before in some art.

>>380389228
That's what a baboon would look like to an artist with no idea what he's doing trying to reconstruct an animal without regard for muscle attachments or joint movements in some lame attempt to appear smart. No one would look at a baboon skeleton with all its mammal features and draw it like a dinosaur.

at least the worlds are flat though

File: d4cb196845a0448eb32c7eebb8f048a6.jpg (23KB, 500x300px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x300px

>>380383931
>Future lizardmen dig up an Rhino and a Rat skeleton
>Rat has traces of fossilised fur
>Decide that by proxy the Rhino had shaggy fur

>>380388159
>>380393047
>>380404535
Doesn't rule out feathers is what it says.

>>380408212
What it says is that T-rexes are more scaled than they are feathered, which is cool enough for me at least.

File: temp.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

It isn't a T-Rex but here you go I guess

whats the deal with every dinosuar needing feathers? did they stick feathers on Triceratops too?

yes, yes they do

File: 1497240273725.jpg (212KB, 1600x937px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1600x937px

>>380396479
>>380404884
>I want to see fat dinosaurs

say no more, senpai

File: woolly_rhino.jpg (68KB, 640x395px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 640x395px

>>380407286
Well, they wouldn't be entirely wrong.