Da new COD

File: 31f898c0167334c21a6820d2bf2e7d54a3ea2877f519da3eb7d7c2a1c49f7278.jpg (56KB, 490x746px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 490x746px

>>380368619

What's immersion breaking about a piece of glass with a bit of red paint in the middle?

WE

WUZ

OMAHA BEACH N SHIET

File: M1A1_Carbine_Aperture_Sight_WaW.png (398KB, 977x472px) Image search: [Google]

398KB, 977x472px

still better than Treyarch's attempt at a WWII red dot, that thing was ugly

>>380368619
Call of Duty is going to be always the same old shit, playing something else if you want historical accuracy, that E3 gameplay they showed had womyn US soldiers and paratroopers landing in the middle of a fucking city.

>honestly thinking this game wasn't going to have a not-red dot sight
what next, you thought there wasn't going to be a not-UAV?
just wait til they tell you about the not-attack helicopter, aka attack plane that circles around the map blasting fuckers with machine guns

File: ian5.jpg (8KB, 152x135px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 152x135px

>>380368619

>>380368619
>thinking a red dot sight is the same as piece of glass with a dot on it

I swear you kids get dumber every year.

Why not?

Red dot was in WaW

>>380368619
still less stupid going all out dual weilding pistols

>>380369750
you have got to be fucking shitting me

It's already a magical version of WWII with infinitely less soldiers and magical respawning. What's wrong with throwing in weapon mods?

>>380371796
>>380372037
OP actually expected historical accuracy in a CoD game. Its his own fault.