Why won't they announce this?

File: 1360640181164.png (13KB, 468x401px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 468x401px

>switch

>>380324275
Because the Switch can't run them.

>>380324275
/v/ is unironically an echo chamber for souls fags

This series isn't nearly as popular as you talk yourself into believing.

>>380324470
a toaster could run dark souls m8

>>380324275
because you touch yourself at night.

>>380324275

Too scary for 80% of Nintendo's userbase: children 6 and under.

At least you've got Monster Hunter.

>>380324470
Explain in thourough detail how the Switch couldn't run Dark Souls 1 or 2.

>>380324470
The Switch could easily run 1/2. 3 could probably be done at low settings with a high of maybe 25 FPS.

>>380324489
This. No one would buy them.
Le hardest game meme died off.
Fags only want overwatch and pubg.

>>380324581
>a toaster could run dark souls m8

3 is pretty intensive my PC could run Witcher 3 at 60fps no sweat, yet in DS3 it had frame drops at some places.

>>380324709
Electricity behaves identically no matter what console it runs through. So machines with less transistors are less capable of doing the necessary computing for more advanced games.

>>380324275
Because nintendofans would find out how a good oldschool modern zelda would play.
And nintendo doesn't want that

>>380324860
DaS3 has some optimization problems, just not as glaring as DaS. Firelink Shrine, Archdragon's Peak and Dragonslayer Armor are the most obvious

t. a guy who beat the game with a 560Ti

DaS2 could run on toasters though

>>380326002
Fuck off

>>380324470
From already confirmed they have a build of Dark Souls 3 on the Switch though