>another remaster
isn't this their second one?
why not just develop a new game, with the same aesthetics and mechanics?
>>380216127
just saw another thread about the same topic, disregard this thread and ignore please
>>380216127
>why not just develop a new game, with the same aesthetics and mechanics?
That would require them to work for our money.
Even though they have the blueprints to success in front of them (((they))) would rather churn out another remaster to maximize profits for the least amount of effort possible.
>>380216127
rather than a remaster it looks like this has new models entirely. a remaster usually has then same models or slightly altered models with enhanced textures and lighting, this looks like they're doing a 1:1 recreation from the ground up with current tech.
i don't mind
>>380218078
Remasters can have new models. The scale of the game looks the same as the PS2 game so it's probably the same game with new graphics. The boss and horse animations are the same too.
So, a remaster.