What's your take on the new Crash remaster?

I disagree with their decision to put that man with the lap top in the corner of the screen, it's too distracting.

>>380018227
>change one detail
>WOW THIS RUINS THE WHOLE GAME GONNA EMULATE THE ORIGINALS INSTEAD TAKE THAT
It's just one weird Australian with a laptop, it's a creative decision that I think works

>>380018154
I couldn't give a shit about it

I don't like what they did to the hands on Slippery Climb.

Everything else I'm indifferent about.

>>380018154
colors look dull compared to the first one. sure remaster looks good as far as clarity goes but the style is ruined.

>>380018154
Don't really see the point in playing the same game without the nostalgia

It's coming in Xbone right?

>>380018704

The anon you replied to didn't say anything bad about the game he simply said he didn't like LPer's

>>380018154
Waiting to see if the exclusivity is real or timed.

File: it_s_something_in_hd_by_lemmino-d6025iy.png (26KB, 678x979px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 678x979px

So are there actually any differences apart from visually?

It looks great but I'm not sure there's much point in remaking a game if you're just going to 1:1 it. The original is still there.

>>380019990
Time trials in 1+2
1 no longer controls like ass
Coco fully playable.

>>380019990

Playable Coco and Relics in Crash 1 & 2.

>>380020139
>1 no longer controls like ass
explain why crash1 controls are bad

>>380018154
crash has always been trash

i dont care

>>380020297
man you suck at choosing threads to post in

>>380018154
>Unlisted Leaf
A FUCKING LEAF

>>380020278
I am not 100% sure on this. Most of my thoughts are going from 2 to 1.

>Jumping feels sluggish. Instead of the smooth time it takes to jump in 2, he kinda just floats for a little bit while performing the animation
>Spinning making you move is a bit stupid
>No slide jumping

Reminds me of this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgbGgtq-NMc

>>380019484
That was a joke you dork.

>>380020547
>No slide jumping
you understand why this is a silly thing to say, right?

>>380018704
C'mon. It's unlistedleaf, he's one of the most annoying YouTubers. I can't believe they decided to put him in the corner, really sucks the fun out. Really strange design choice if you ask me.

>>380020757
I do, but I only put it in there because it was a preference thing.

30
FRAMES
PER
SECOND

>>380020827
or that only 2 niggles doesn't constitute bad controls

I hope the dpad is used as movement input
don't think I can play crash with the analogue stick

woah

The colors are ugly, animations could have been improved but werent, the framerate is unfrogivable.

>>380020807
What do you expect? Millenials love youtuber facecams, only makes sense that a dev would decide to put it in their game.
Prepare for more of this to come in the near future. Hell, maybe even in other games this E3.

>>380018154
dont give a shit about the remakes for the first 3 games. first off they dont need to be remade, they're completely playable still. second, the art direction is completely ruined because crash was created to be the pinnacle of 90s low poly 3d design. third, the remakes are fucking lazy - loading times, colors are washed out brown mud distance fog to hide render distance (which wasnt there in the originals) and the fucking games run at 30fps, there's zero excuse for that.

HOWEVER, if they remake CTR, i am definitely interested, as its multiplayer mode would benefit greatly when brought to current gen standards. the framerate was sub 20s in multiplayer, many tracks were unavailable and NPC racers disappeared.

>showing comparisons
>suddenly a quick cut to a tire burning out
>more comparisons and new/improved features
>suddenly full blown CTR with online also on the same disc

>>380019812
It's going to be timed, guaranteed

>>380018845
glad you posted then

Bosses have new cutscenes apparently. Also, PapuPapu needs 5 hits now.

>>380023913
Then I'll wait for the PC version so I can play 60fps, no fog, fixed colors.

>>380021135
WHY
DO
YOU
WRITE
LIKE
THIS

>>380018154
It looks like shit. I'm curious about what the people who think this looks good would say a bad Crash remaster would look like.

>>380025014
SO
PEOPLE
SEE
IT
RUNS
IN
30
FRAMES
PER
SECOND
ON
PS4
"PRO"

>>380025014
reddit's fucked me up

>>380025272
this is a bad crash bandicoot remake

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GDE04j4Hdc

>>380025272
Like the sequels after psx?

>>380025673
>>380025835
So it would have to literally look like a one-man fan game or a PS2 game for people to consider it bad? Are standards really that low?

>>380018154
Can't wait to play it.

>>380026021
>Are standards really that low?

Considering that everyone praised the living shit out of Timetwister, then yeah, I guess they are.

Honestly after 8 years of no games and cockteases, I'm just glad to have Crash back again. I don't want to see him go down the dark path that was the 6th gen Crash

>>380026146
This. Somewhat cheap here in Australia too.

File: 1497223137187.jpg (142KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 450x450px

>>380025673
>that spin animation
holy shit

>>380018154
Some changes are fine others are shit

>>380023231
>the framerate is unfrogivable
It's pretty lame to not bring a full fledged remake up to 60fps but it's not going to ruin it either as the originals ran at 30fps, so it's not like they downgraded it

>>380026386
>I don't want to see him go down the dark path that was the 6th gen Crash
pancakes xdd

>>380018154
Never played the originals, but I do like the remaster.

>>380020139
>Coco fully playable

As in, all 3 games? Does she even do anything different, or is she just a glorified female option?

>>380026021
I mostly meant the artwork so it doesn't really matter if it's ps2

File: 1491664266962.jpg (120KB, 808x465px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 808x465px

>>380025673
This is ugly and very stiff.

considering they're not changing enemy/box placement, or adding new stages, and it's solely cosmetic changes - eh. the new graphics looks really rough in places. Crash's model looks fucking better in the Skylanders game than he does in this. The playable Coco and features from 3 added in 1 and 2 aren't really enough to sway me. i think i'd have sooner paid for a bundle with the original 3 games together (and maybe like CTR) with no changes than i would for this.

>>380018154
>those faded colors

It just doesn't feel right.

>>380027097
>Does she even do anything different, or is she just a glorified female option?
well she sort of has to be capable of everything crash can do or then her being fully playable would be pointless, so in all likeliness no.

File: 1473552602998.png (37KB, 175x147px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 175x147px

>>380025673

It looks kinda soulless, the original Crash was a technological marvel, reading about the sorcery they pulled with the hardware to squeeze out every last creative drop they could is inspiring. Now it's just a bunch of faggots who have more power than they could ever need, and it shows in their total lack of creativity.

>>380019990
>remake a game to be a little different
>people lose their shit
>make it 1:1 to avoid fanboy riots
>people lose their shit

File: tastysona5.jpg (64KB, 431x639px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 431x639px

What's the point of making a 1:1 remaster of a game if you actually make it look worse in the new attempt?
I want to strangle Activision's artistic directors. Educate yourselves, grow a fucking talent or change a job. Redoing a game in more details means shit if you fuck up absolutely everything else in the process.
On visual design completely misses the points of the original. Fucking lazy. I've seen amateur, one-man projects holding better aesthetics.
REEEEEE

Almost all the complaints I've had so far have been nitpicks, and when I can only nitpick something I take that as a sign that it's good overall. 30fps is a joke and the colors are still fucking desaturated, but other then that I'm happy enough with it to still want to buy it.

Did they ever add a drop shadow or do they still not understand why that's important in a platformer?

File: super mario 64 remaster.jpg (143KB, 938x888px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 938x888px

>>380029020
N Sane Trilogy is a prime example of incompetent artists thinking texturing cartoony character designs as realistically as possible actually looks good. it's ok for the backgrounds, but everyone in this game looks awful, not helped by the shitty dull lighting and drab colors.

>>380029020
it doesn't look worse, just different, and it captures the originals style well. Takeoff you nostalgia glasses
>>380029357
Crash always had a drop shadow in NST

>>380027758
>Now it's just a bunch of faggots who have more power than they could ever need
which they still fail to use - short draw distance and 30fps being obvious examples.

Bone Yard footage with the Dorito Pope
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhBGBTkU5ZQ&t=151

>>380018154
FUCK ACTIVISION .. That's my take .. I'll pick it up used so those slimy fucks so get a dollar from me

I doubted them. Back when they were showing Crash 1. But then they fixed that up and Crash 1 (by them) looked better. Crash 3 looks shit though. I kinda doubt they're going to fix that one too.

>>380018154
It seems a lot better than I would have expected.
By no means perfect visually, but I can't complain.

File: crash-long-shadow.jpg (160KB, 643x475px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 643x475px

>they still didn't fix Crash shadow

No hope for this remake.

File: PerArena.jpg (408KB, 1024x512px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 1024x512px

What did they mean by this?

>>380030038
Sorry man, it is worse and doesn't have the understanding of the original's style.The original looks vibrant, expressive and the artists knew how to work with colors palettes to make each stage look holistic. They worked around low resolution with and other technical limitations with a style.

The remaster is just "Let's every element put in higher resolution ASAP!! Don't mind the details or how it works with each other!". It's wrong on high level, but you can even see in details how little care they put, even in bits that were literally traced.
Look at OP pic. Tiny's head in the icon in the original looks at the viewer. In the remaster the lines were traced but the tracer didn't care to understand the pic and lack of shading makes the tiger look far left.
In the original's Tiny's head on the arena, his lower lip wraps around his teeth, through the shade. In the remaster that part just cuts and makes a weird rim before the teeth. Less than deviantart level of competency.

The problems are on all levels, the base and the details. It is different. AND worse. Don't you dare be happy with that compilation.

>>380023679

First game is not 'completely playable', it controls badly.

The art direction is the same.

The remake is anything but lazy, since they didn't have any code or anything of the old game and had to remake every little thing and try to make it feel and look like the original but then in actual full 3D. The colors have been consistently fixed showing that they are actually trying. Also new content.

Agree on CTR though.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (144KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1280x720px

>>380030038
>it doesn't look worse, just different
Bullshit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_lBdlIE-Gc
These remakes are doing that thing where the animators over-animate expressions to compensate for their lack of ability to convey subtle emotions while also not committing to tone or atmosphere.

>>380035453
Uka Uka is honestly the only thing I think looks significantly worse. He's such a simple design, and Aku Aku is mostly intact, there was no reason for this.

Everything else is fine.

its perfect, how a remaster should be done. if i had a ps4 id buy it just to support it.

>>380018154
>give every character a redesign

>leave the giant portrait on the ground untouched

>>380018154
Ugly. Character design is seriously lacking for the Tawna character. She's supposed to be humourously sexy, but they've designed her like Coco+10years.

Everything else seems faithful.

>>380018154
This screenshot just makes me appreciate the original more. That's pretty impressive for ps1 hardware.

>a fan made CRASH BANDICOOT IN UNREAL ENGINE 4

anyway I'm pretty sure I will get it at some point, but I'm not paying $60

>>380021545
You can use both

>>380038564
It's not made in Unreal Engine 4, it's made in Unity.

i've pre-ordered and cancelled this fucking game so many times over the last year. i just don't know

>>380039385
It's made in alchemy

>>380036305
>how a remaster should be done
jesus christ

>it's a Ding Dong samefags episode

>>380039457
Wow. So you're still not sure even after Coco was confirmed playable in all 3 games with her own unique moveset, nor by the fact that Crash 1 is going to be the single best game in the trilogy now since not only were time trials added, but the controls and physics have to work for all three games, and they still haven't revealed what the big 'surprise' is for E3.

>>380021135
You're joking, right?

>>380018154
Lacks visual flair, otherwise probably competent. Considering that the graphical overhaul is half the point of a remake seems like they dropped the ball hard.

Why does it take forever to load the Time Twister?

>>380018154
I actually think its very well done. While not every detail is prefectly a 1:1 transfer, they definitly paid attention to every little thing in each level and that speaks a lot to me.

>>380041768
coco is the surprise bud
i want it to be ctr remake but the writings on the wall

New E3 footage when?

>>380018154
Where is the red colour

>>380018154
Colors look a bit dull on that particular screen but that's a REALLY old build so there's some hope.

>>380037257
It was redone, look at the teeth.

You guys find some really incorrect and stupid things to bitch about. It's mental.

>>380043771
Tomorrow for sure.

>>380043771
9 hours