#4theplayers
>>380016253
and they say sony isn't anti-consumer
You Nintendo kids and Xbots will be sorry! Reason they declined is because they are getting Minecraft 2
>>380016253
>People unironically PAY a yearly/monthly fee to have such a limited service
SONY ALWAYS WINS BABY
>>380016547
>no backwards compatibility with PS3
>no backwards compatibility with PS2
>no backwards compatibility with PS1
>can't play minecraft with people on other platforms
i wouldn't want to be a sonyfag right now
That's pretty bizarre honestly. Partially for the fact that Nintendo would reach across the isle to do any sort of network shit considering they barely do their own network shit. But mostly because it seems like a dumb idea for Sony to just refuse to work on cross-platform network compatibility for a title like Minecraft. Maybe there were some weird licensing strings attached? Microsoft does own the Minecraft property and could probably dictate the terms of the arrangement.
>>380016253
>current year
>still talking about minecraft
>PS4 has now worse online than a fucking handheld
Sony sucks so fucking much my god..
>>380016547
Holy shit...Sony wins again! It's coming boys.
>>380016852
It doesn't matter if you're a fan or not, to deny the huge fan base Minecraft has and how big of a deal this is just makes you look like an idiot anon.
are people seriously bragging about mineycrafta?
the state of /v/ in 2017, Jesus Christ
>>380016824
Right now the only thing the PS4 has going for it is the larger user base. Yes there are exclusives, but less than 5% of PS4 owners buy those anyway. Why buy a PS4 if you can play games with your friends who have one anyway?
>>380016824
>considering they barely do their own network shit
That's an old ass misconception from the Wii era.
The Wii U had a perfectly fine network, free and without major issues. The Switch is even better, although not free.
And unlike PSN, Nintendo's network never had a big hacker attack and never lost sensible infos.
>>380016810
You will want to be one in about 18 hours
>>380017052
It's not just Minecraft. Sony is refusing to give cross platform multiplayer since last year for several games, when both Microsoft and Nintendo were both ok with it.
>>380017126
Wii's online was fairly solid, except for Brawl for some reason.
>>380016253
>platform with the best library refused to partake in autistic circlejerk
>>380017126
The only game i had a problem with on the wii u was ssb4 and sometime splatoon when i was was playing someone Japan.
>minecraft
Oh shit lads, I've quantum leaped backwards by 5 years.
Help
>>380016852
Someone didn't see the super duper 4k graphics update
>>380017052
>2017
>console still doesn't have brownbricks
Sony never fails to amuse me
>>380016253
You can shut up now
I don't understand how it's physically possible to defend Sony at this point.
Is Bloodborn THAT good?
>>380018331
Because sales, my dear friend. Many sales mean it's good, right?
>>380018331
I'm Brazilian and won't be able to afford another console until like 2020. I have no choice but to defend them.
>>380017070
But every userbase for Minecraft is already huge. Adding more wouldn't make a difference realistically, but refusing xplay only makes it harder for friends to play together
>>380016253
>Caring about minecraft on consoles
Not just Minecraft:
>A developer speaking on the official Gunscape forum noted that cross-play between Switch and Xbox One has been “conditionally approved”. We assume that means players on both consoles would be able to play online together if Gunscape were to be made for Switch.
http://nintendoeverything.com/gunscape-conditionally-approved-for-cross-play-between-switch-and-xbox-one/
>>380019338
>Caring about minecraft
>>380016253
Pretty sure that means using Microsoft's services or something agreeing to this as a different company is not smart at all.
>>380017126
Wii U's online was still missing basic features
Reminder that Sony is the reason Tekken 7 isn't crossplay and you should hate them for that.