If Sony or Nintendo announced any of the games shown besides sports and NFS /v/ would be hailing them as the games the industry needs, but since it's EA it's terrible and shit.
I can't imagine how much of a hipster faggot you need to be to say that this is one of the worst E3 conferences ever when there no gaffs and at least one unique game with potential.
>defending EA
>calling other people hipsters
>Thinks a shitty "cinematic" co-op game that looks like a poor man's attempt at Uncharted on an engine that seems like it was made for a licensed game and a generic post-apocalypse game with no actual gameplay would be hailed as great
How fucking dense are you?
>>379754128
>having standards is jaded and contrarian
>so is knowing that EA is shit
What's next, you are going to defend Ubisoft and CoD, you stupid dumb shit go to Gamefaqs and Reddit if you want to gush over AAA shit made for retards.
>>379754128
It's not even that the games premises or concepts are bad, it's the way they were presented. EA does a really shitty job of presenting games when they don't think it will rake in millions of dollars, it's their standard practice. I'll be overjoyed if the games are actually good, but based on how EA has presented them and their history of under-funding non-guaranteed IPs, I doubt it
>>379754128
>0.05$ have been deposited in your origin account