Why can't we go back to that time?
>implying the ps1 is good
>literally the shit stain of platforming games and terrible controls
crash bandicoot doesn't deserve a remaster
if anything it should be thrown away and shot
>>379659617
Sonyfaggots insist on HD everything, so no middle market publishers. No risky small niche titles. No selling popular games for $19.99 after two years. Everything needs to be big budget, mass marketed, and selling all the millions to break even.
>why can't we go back to a time where gaming moved to style over substance dreck to attract new gamers that don't know any better and wouldn't know good gameplay if it hit them in the ass, using a fucking locked down console that is inadequate for many types of games
>back
We're still there. We need to go back a lot further than the fucking PS1.
I'd be okay with the ps2.
>>379659617
Because its graphics suck.
>>379660175
>blame sony consoles
>the only console where games like Witch and the Hundred Knight gets to exist
Here is your (you).
>>379659617
because gaming as we know it is dead.
>We're still there. We need to go back a lot further than the fucking PS1.
The N64 was even worse for the reasons you stated
>>379659978
I will fucking kill you where you stand faggot
>>379661065
I bet you thought Mario 64 had good gameplay
>>379659617
Love u forever ps1
>>379660365
>to a time where gaming moved to style over substance
>FF games
>DQ games
>so on so forth
I mean, I recall FF games having just as much substance, and sidequests even having more variety than before. Also, isn't DQ VII the longest game in the series? PS1 was an era of balancing looks with substance.
>>379661313
It objectively did though