thirty frames per second

>>379597758
original games were 30 fps. it was designed around 30fps, so there should be no problems

>>379597758
Nice review for BOTW

>>379598721
BOTW isn't about a Sonic clone who is all about high speed and quick reactions.

just like the old games
/thread

troll thread on /v/

>>379597913
It should also be released at 640x480 resolution since it was fine for the original, right?

File: switch-drop.jpg (29KB, 780x435px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 780x435px

>>379599628
Hey, just because the old games have low framerate doesn't mean this new game should too. I mean, OoT and MM running at sub 30fps didn't result in BotW running at .... oh wait

It's hilarious how /v/ is so concerned about graphics and framerates that they ignore the actual important things like gameplay.

>>379599857
that resolution doesn't work on modern tv screens so your argument is invalid

>>379600294
It works, just looks like shit. Just like 30 fps.

>>379599902
Is that a bad bait or just anal blasted for op bait?

>>379597913
>>379599628
>implying that makes it acceptable
Looks like shit and runs like shit.

>m-muh frames
Do PCFags even enjoy video games without mentioning frames and resolution?

>>379600892
>Stop complaining, I like the taste of shit!

>>379600892
But sonybros do the same

>>379600982
>>379600764
>I'm a spoiled kid, gimme muh frames and resolution, video games are literally unplayable if they're not how I want them to be!

>>379600614
It's not perfect in some areas but it's 30 almost all the time.

>>379597758
If Mario Odyssey is 60 on a fucking tablet this would be more laughable

>>379597913
>it was designed around 30fps
that doesn't mean anything. stop saying that.

>>379600764
Sure the graphics looks a bit like plastic unity stuff but the game seems to run well from what I've seen.

>defending 30 fps for a platformer
only sony fans

File: 1490749008993.jpg (76KB, 720x614px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 720x614px

>>379600115
>defending a 30FPS platformer in 2017

>>379600115
dude it's not like crash ever had any game changing gameplay. and this is a literal remake, not adding anything.

so is it coming to pc or not, u don't wanna buy the ps4 one if there's gonna be a 60fps pc version later

>>379602565
Answer the man!!

>Crash
>PC
Lol

>>379600115
Framerate is gameplay related you idiot.

>>379602872
I think you are forgetting it's Activision

>>379602565
it for sure is, they never confirmed it as an exclusive. if it was, they would be screaming it. timed exclusive. i'm also betting on it coming for switch and that being the best selling version. basically the ps4 version would be the worst, not being the best graphically or being portable

>>379602565
>>379602860
Crash would Crash on PC

>>379602981
fucking kiketivision, they know I will buy it twice because I don't feel like waiting a year for the pc version

>>379603104
i give it 3 months. at most they'll want to have a kid friendly game in time for holiday for switch so i guess that's happening then

>>379597758
Which of course is not very playable

>>379601225
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCEDlpaUXVE&index=17&list=FL7MlRJfnKM_QDPE90A4m-TQ

ok

>>379602565
1 year exclusive

>>379597758
Sage

>>379598721
>Comparing an incredibly linear game where you run down corridors to a game with a gigantic, dynamic open world.

No excuse for crash to be 30FPS.

>>379603451
Do you wake up every day exited to post in the same thread?

>>379603553
It's the only way I can cum.

>>379601797
>>379603225
>/v/ loves SM64. Spyro and Crash
>almost universally praised despite running at 30 fps except for the occasional shitposter
>Crash gets a fucking remake
>30FPS?! Unacceptable! Unplayable! FUCKING SONY REEEEE

The success of the PS4 broke this board. And it's glorious.

File: image.gif (3MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 320x240px

>>379597758
ITT: anons complain and unironically argue about a game they can't even play on their own platform. They literally won't even be playing it.

>>379603774
>>379603845
This

>>379603774
wow hardware made 20 years later is 30 fps also, weehee. also nintendo has been making 60fps games and platformers for years no. a game as basic as crash has no excuse to be 30 on ps4, much less the pro

>>379603774
Remakes tend to improve on the originals. Mario 64 ran at 20fps. If it game out remade running at 30, /v/ would be out for blood.

>>379599857
the original wasn't even 480 more like 352 x 240. PS1 games hardly ever went past this resolution.

I've played it.
Nice falseflag.
It's 60 fps.

>>379604014
considering 3d and 2d mario has been 60 fps for ages.
come on people. i'm excited to play this but there's no excuse for a game as simple as this to be 30 fps on such a powerful console. it's such a weird decision, why people feel like they should defend it i'll never know

File: 1496975930400.jpg (72KB, 752x816px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 752x816px

That is really disappointing if true, the game doesn't even look good enough to warrant 30fps. I'll still get it, though.

console drones will do anything to defend exclusives
i unironically think if it was 10 fps they would still defend it
as long as the pc doesnt have it
i mean its the only thing they got going on literally everything else is superior on pc

>>379597758
0 fps on PC xD