Is this it anons? Will AMD finally be competitive in the high end?

File: georg.png (457KB, 605x580px) Image search: [Google]

457KB, 605x580px

i don't know, how about you wait for real benchmarks you thick fuck

>>379233483
>142 FPS

Not 144 FPS??

Thats on vulkan though. We need dx12 benchmarks since that's 95% of new games. Vega does look promising, but we still need to wait and see. Launch end of next month for gaming cards.

>>379234420
>We need dx12 benchmarks since that's 95% of new games
BAHAHHAHAAH

File: 1480539489645.jpg (31KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 960x960px

>Vega drops for $499
people would lose their fucking minds

>>379234721
Name new games coming out on Vulkan laddie.

>>379233483
>vulkan
Eh, only 1 game uses it
>Not the 1080 ti that it will be price competing with
It, I assume, will still beat the 1080ti, but why not put it there.

>>379235108
Name new games coming out on DX12 that don't perform better in DX11 mode.

>>379235505
Still better than vulkan. AMD's in house vulkan should have been huge. But it ended up being on a short list of mediocre titles.

>>379235226
The dual one may beat the 1080ti, but crossfire is hit or miss so it will depend on what you want to play.

>>379235715
Considering the single GPU beats an Xp, I doubt it'll be an issue.

>>379233483
>new thing is better than old thing
>newer thing comes out
>WHO COULD HAVE SEEN THIS COMING

>>379233483
AMD VEGA low end when?

>>379237576
Probably early 2018.

>>379234420
DX12 benchmarks are likely to be the similar since both Vulkan and DX12 are based on Mantle.

>>379239809
>dx12
>based on mantle

'no'

there is no evidence of dx12 ever being related to mantle. they share a similar purpose but they're not sharing the same code like vulkan and mantle did.

File: CBBu9COWwAAPzZB.jpg (134KB, 956x467px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 956x467px

>>379239979
Sure thing bud.