The sequel is going to suck, isn't it?

>>378959463
Just as the original

>>378959463
Original wasn't even that good.

Just really atmospheric.

It won't be bad, I think that it'll be alright. They'll prob pull a GTA5 and focus somewhat more on the Multiplayer.

>>378959463
What do you think after GTAV? It's going to be a fucking shit

File: 1483797028216s.jpg (7KB, 194x250px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 194x250px

I'm scared the online will be just like GTA V's
which it probably will be

>>378959463
>Red Dead Redemption will be stuck at 720p 30fps forever
feels bad, how's that 360 emulator shaping up?

>>378960873
You can play a dbz game with very bad graphical glitches. Better than the ps3 emulator which hasn't done much but launch a menu. Should be ready in 5 years.

I'm really interested in how BotW affected RDR2's development. Nintendo came out of nowhere and made a game that had everyone calling it a master class in game design and pondering what makes a game fun. BotW is really 99% core gameplay/1% story. RDR is mostly story + copy pasted shallow tps gameplay from other open world games.

>>378961040
the ps3 emulator has gotten a lot better
https://rpcs3.net/

Going to guess that campaign wont be as serious and will be affected like GtAV. Focus wull be on shitty online with microtransactions.

It will look and play good tho

>>378959463
>wanting RDR2 instead of a Blood Meridian vidya adaption
>never being able to murder and scalp indian children
>never being able to enslave a retard and put him in a cage
>never being able to shoot someone with a fucking howitzer

why even live /v/ if this game never exists because bleeding hearts think it would be disgusting?