Lords of the Fallen complete edition worth getting for $15?

>>378919337
Absolutely not.

I tried giving it an honest try, but it's pretty damn clunky. It has some good things going for it but honestly you might wind up giving up on it near the end like I did. Try The Surge instead, maybe.

Definitely not. Wait for The Surge to go on sale, that's the only game they made that was good.

No, the entire time I played Lord of the Fallen I couldn't stop thinking that I could just play Dark Souls instead

slower dark souls. ok if you're really jonesing for a dark souls-lite, but the surge is much better in that regard.

>>378919576
I've played the ever loving fuck out of all them and quite frankly just looking to scratch that itch again before their next game. Does it at least do that?

Nah lords is pretty meh, wouldn't grab it unless you're really fiending for a souls like. Nioh was pretty good although gets a bit repetative since they show you 90% of the enemy variety half way through.

>>378919728
Not really, it feels like a cheap imitation
Have you tried the Kings Field games?

>>378919728
No.
Replay a Souls game or play a kings field game for the itch.
This game is a rash.

I got it for $10. I returned it after 2 hours. It's just Souls but with slow, clunky combat.

It's worth it although I got it for "free" as it was a PS Plus title a while back.

Is it worth $15? Yes.

Is it a decent game? Yes.

Is it amazing when comparing it to Souls or Bloodborne? Of course not.

Nope but the Surge is great.