Is it a better World war 1 game? I want to buy it but I am skeptical since there's gonna be a Verdun 2 in Russia/Germany (source: http://store.steampowered.com/app/633460/Tannenberg/)
It's way closer to a simulator, as in brutal as fuck, and also way more authentic when it comes to the era's gear and warfare (as in, you do lots of trench & noman's land warfare).
in short, the polar opposite of BF bullshit
>>378834959
>as in brutal as fuck
How many players per side is there in this?
>>378835662
16v16 in the main mode
8v8 in team death match/free for all
4 players in coop (waves)
too many white people
It certainly looks more drab that's for sure.
We need some niggers in there mate, cause you know they fought for Hitler!! Didnt you know that!!? This game needs to be culturally enriched
>>378836154
its made with unity
Unity engine sucks
>>378834652
I remember playing it when it was browser game with single map
Trying to break through big open field with barely any cower while under fire from machine guns was great
No idea how it is now tho
Battlefield 1 for dumb american console kids, that love shitty arcade guns, and other unlocks. Average IQ of the player base is 73.2
Verdun for hardcore players, that love a realistic game based on history. Average IQ of the player base is 148.3
You choose.
>>378834652
Better gameplay, simulation and somewhat realistic ww1. Worse graphics and sound.
>>378834652
Runs like shit, plays like shit, only has like 16v16 if that. Play Red Orchestra 1 instead if you want a hardcore shit-eating experience, there will never be a good WW1 game.
>>378836787
once again, the engine has nothing to do with the developing team's artistic skills.
This game for example runs on HL1 engine.
>no vehicles
Meh.
>>378837063
Studdies have shown that bragging about supposed IQ is inversely proportional with frequency of getting laid
>>378839603
And intelligence.
>>378837063
>IQ
Congrats, here's your (You)
I just like games with combined arms.
>>378834652
It somehow feels like it's getting worse as time goes on, instead of better. It has a completely different pace compared to BF1 too - you spend a lot of time crawling slowly towards the other side when you're attacking, and then getting shot by someone you didn't see.
I dunno if I'm just imagining it, but it feels like it used to be a bit more fast paced though. Maybe it's just because it's more dead these days compared to a year or two ago.
>>378839730
They want you to buy Tannenberg, their new game with 32v32 and on the Eastern Front
DICE does the same shit, slowly make your game worse as you get closer to the release of your new game and people will just buy the new one