Why aren't you in the beta for the new Battletech game, /v/?

Thought about kickstarting it, but I really prefer Mechwarrior to Battletech. I just want a good fucking single player Mechwarrior game again.

It looks bad and they're not making a good use of the Battletech license at all.

File: 18622125_1946558972244532_5654410385127023568_n.png.jpg (25KB, 500x869px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x869px

>>378806936

Brother.

>>378806863
Too busy playing tabletop.
Have YOU cored out a Raven with a tree today?

Because I have.

>>378806936
Shit, I'd even consider buying an Xbone if they brought out a new MechAssault game.

Or Steel Battalion that wasn't some motion control bullshit.

How is the mission design compared to MechCommander?

>>378806936
>I just want a good fucking single player Mechwarrior game again.
PGI had a demo for a single player MechWarrior at MechCon last year, but there hasn't been any new news on since then

>>378807057
yeah this

we already have a turn-based battletech game and it's far better than this

File: 20170601192452_1.jpg (345KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 1600x900px

>>378807057
Have you SEEN what it LOOKS like to stomp another mech's face in?

cause I did

>>378807232
It was literally just gameplay footage of Mechwarrior: Online with some dropships added in. They won't do shit, and if they do, it will be less than half-assed garbage.

>>378807043
I appreciate Battletech, but I'd rather just play the actual tabletop with custom painted miniatures if I'm going to play a turned-based 'mech game. Having it on the computer just makes me want to play something real-time.

>>378807752
>They won't do shit, and if they do, it will be less than half-assed garbage.
hi vass

>>378808010
>vass

Oh fuck it's been awhile. I miss the old Kong boys.

>>378807124
no missions yet

you just get a lance and you go at it with an AI lance. You can choose what kind of mechs or lances you or what your enemy to have, and the money limit. There are some maps and you can choose the time of day

>>378807442
What where?

>>378808678

Well, megamek exists but that's just a straight tabletop simulator

>>378806863
Game keeps hanging on me. Can't play more than 20 minutes.

>those portraits

Makes me appreciate MW4 Mercs that much more

File: sad guts.png (121KB, 283x343px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 283x343px

>>378808359
>I miss the old Kong boys
as do I
>tfw Vass has literally turned into a drug dealer and is drifting farther and farther away from reality
>old konglets dropping out from existence one by one
It's not all bad though.
just a few weeks ago we had an all metal baby with some atlas drops and it was genuinely the most fun I've had with MWO in a long time

>>378806863
Needs maximum LRM

>>378809129
>Vass has literally turned into a drug dealer

I guess I'm not terribly surprised, but where the fuck did you learn this?

>>378809569
>but where the fuck did you learn this?
From Vass himself my main dude

>>378808940
Shit graphics though. I want to see my Atlas rip and tearing.

>>378809816
Good lord.

Last time I visited the /vg/ thread everyone had moved to some other game and I didn't even see that he was part of it anymore.

Damn shame. I appreciated his angry, cynical attitude, and I loved getting in on 12 man drops.

>>378809952
If you mean other game as in Star Citizen, that shit stopped being hyped years ago. As things are now, there's two kongs: mumble kong, which is just Old kong plus neo kong and play MWO and sometimes other games, and there's Discord kong which just has the all the old kong who used to hype SC and are now just bitter vets who play overwatch and other games of the sort. Some kong hangs out in only one of the two, and some both. We still get old blood back occasionally, especially lately seeing how MWO is getting new tech.

Vass is still Vass, he just drops by mumble less frequently

YET ANOTHER STRATEGY GAME
Jesus Christ have you opened Steam recently?! PC devs please stop making strategy games I know theyre easy but fuck this platform is dead

>>378810584
okay dudebot

>>378807454
I've seen it. Have you done firing declarations for an entire lance of Long Tom batteries today?

Because I have, and man artillery is fun AS FUCK.

>>378811151
Artillery is cowardly.

I hope this games is a hit so they can hurry up and do another shadowrunner game

File: 1484948281039.png (69KB, 420x578px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 420x578px

>>378811209
But FUN AS FUCK.

Are you a clanner? Because you post like a clanner.

Did your scientist caste finally fix your EW or are they just lending you a connection to keep you busy while they wipe your genes from the pool?

>>378809816
Who would openly admit to be a drug dealer on a chinese sweatshop photo posting website regularly checked by the FBI, CIA, MiB and god knows what other fucking organizations from around the world?

did you have to give the kikestarter money to play the beta? is this game going to do the same "start at the beginning of the timeline so all your favorite shit doesn't exist yet" thing?

>>378812118
Yes and yes. Don't bitch about the timeline thing. Pre-clan war era is the best and most balanced era.

>bars and dots instead of pure numbers

What the fuck are they doing?

File: 1449079353563.png (52KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 800x800px

Games fucking great. If this is just the beta I can't fucking wait for the full thing, its gonna be GOTY for me if the singleplayer is as good as its hyped itself to be

>>378813016
Easier at a glance I guess. Mousing over a section gives you more detailed information so maybe eventually it'll be a setting you can change.

>>378812630
but the goat mech is from 3055. is the game also using the garbage tabletop rules for initiative and rng crits?

>>378811715
>Who would openly admit to be a drug dealer on a chinese sweatshop photo posting website regularly checked by the FBI, CIA, MiB and god knows what other fucking organizations from around the world?
nigga you don't Vass

t. Konglet

>>378813643
Which mech? Because all the ones I see on the list are pre 3050 mechs.

RNG Crits I think so. Probably a similar system to the way crits work in MWO.

There's a system where light mechs move first in a phase and heavier mechs move last so I guess it's somewhat similar to initiative.

>>378812630
this

>>378814619
>light mechs move first
Why the fuck do they make the lights LOSE initiative? Jesus fuck that's ass backwards.

File: 756px-nqo7mnar82px18tt5nrhpgod9wjoz5h.png (150KB, 756x599px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 756x599px

>>378814619
initiative in the tabletop is this ass backwards mess where "faster" initiative rolls take their turns last. also everyone takes turns moving before anyone gets to shoot, so an enemy mech can start the turn right in front of you, but then be out of range or behind you by the time you can attack. the crit system is retarded too since it's basically impossible to kill a mech with straight damage, so you have to spam multi-roll attacks like lrms or lbx shots hoping to get a critical hit.

>>378815610
You might want to learn to play before you make yourself look stupid.

Initiative is the way it is because going first is a good thing: You get to see what your opponent did and act accordingly.
Crit-kills are by no means the only way to kill a mech, and both make scattershot weapons good at finishing (but not at starting, since they tend to have trouble breaching armor) and reward mechs that are less "greedy" with delicate or volatile components.

So what exactly game is this? I love battletech, and my friends love mechwarrior (and one plays shitloads of megamek) so more tabletop style we can play online would be great. Starved for mech games like this and not gonna bother with MWO.

>>378816192
no, you mean going first is a good thing in the normal universe because you can take the best terrain. in the backwards tabletop universe going first is bad because your opponent can *teleports behind you* and prevent you from attacking. the whole system also completely falls apart if one side has more units than the other.

>Crit-kills are by no means the only way to kill a mech
this is just wrong. knocking anything bigger than a light mech out with internal structure damage takes so long you're likely to run out of ammo before it happens. "zombie" mechs are a stupid abuse of a poorly designed game.

I forgot this was releasing today, I'll have to download it.

File: Shinji.jpg (49KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 480x360px

I just want this shit to release so HBS can go back to shadowrun games.

as i see this, i feel some sort of nonbacker remorse

>harebrained

so how shit is the AI?

File: tay ehh.gif (2MB, 268x375px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 268x375px

>>378806863
Because I didn't buy it yet.

Go to bed greg

>>378818615
fug off hairyback

>>378817297
You do know that you generally don't field a mech with more guns than ammo bins?

>>378818209
it will eat out your ass if you don't know how to utilize cover or focus fire

it will also do weird shit sometimes like go after your lighter mechs first

>>378806863
Hatchet/Axman WHEN

>>378820027
oh, and it will wreck your shit if you don't match mech weights with theirs
I cannot for the life of me win with the light striker lance. Jenners run too fucking hot

File: 1455489815138.png (21KB, 256x310px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 256x310px

>>378806863
prove to me that it's not a shitty RTS with "muh BattleTech" slapped on top of it

i want to love mechwarrior but i just can't

>>378821023
Well proving it's not a shitty RTS is easy, since it's turn-based.

Proving it won't be a shit game that tosses the good parts of Battletech out, that I cant do.

File: 20170601214725_1.jpg (328KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 1600x900px

>>378821023
because it's not really an RTS?

>>378809129
They're still kicking around in the general. Kong still plays MWO often.

>>378821112

weebshitter shut down hard

File: 1491749773592.png (263KB, 660x627px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 660x627px

>>378821112
>>378821620
ok but does it suck in whatever slow-rts genre it exists in

>>378806863
>Battletech: XCOM edition

mite b cool

>>378821791
No, since it exists in no "slow-rts genre", nor any RTS genre.
See above, RE not an RTS.

>>378806863
why are western mechs always poorly designed?

>>378821791
Are you retarded
>Is it an rts
"No"
>So what kind of rts is it

>>378806863
Cause I don't back kickstarters anymore
call me back when there will be finished product

>>378821791
I don't think you understand that RTS means "real-time strategy." Turn-based =! Real-time. This is a turn-based tactical game where you designate what mechs you want to take into combat beforehand, mechs that you have customized with pilots you've hired to use them. There is also an overworld map that may be similar to X-COM's where you fly around the galaxy taking contracts as a mercenary company. Again, turn-based tactical game like JA2 or X-COM, but with mechs, and a management overworld system like X-COM.

>>378822348
I was about in the same boat, but HBS has proven themselves with their Shadowrun games for me to put up some cash for it.

>>378822786
aside of possibility of product never delivering, you also forget possibility of burn out
So what if product will be released, and will actually deliver, but you won't play it cause you'll be too burned out after playing multiple beta builds and such

>>378823053
or you could just pace yourself so you don't burn yourself out

>>378824189
>having self-restrain
where do you think we are

>>378806863
Because I don't back kickstarters. I am looking forward to the finished game though. Have been hoping for something like this since Mech Commander 2.

File: 1494301567346.jpg (340KB, 787x661px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 787x661px

>>378806863

Regarding that image, I'm not a battletech fan for melee.

Distaste of kickstarter projects.

Strong distaste of harebrained schemes gameplay(great writing on occasion though)

Strong distaste of supporting paradox interactive in any way

Day 1 pirate. If it isn't shit I'll buy.

>>378824189
yeah good luck with that nigger

>>378806863

Because I don't want to get tired of the game before it actually releases.

I wonder if HBS will end up expanding the game to allow for infantry, aerospace, and artillery?

>>378826770
I hope so. Love to see large scale battles done in this game.

File: mad cat.jpg (67KB, 500x605px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 500x605px

>>378821791
Is any game that involves thinking an RTS to you?

Why aren't you playing living legends?

>>378829582
cause online games are for faggots

>battletech
you mean the macross, dougram, etc rip off?

>>378830078
just gotta get good my man

>>378830385
>wasting time to get good to get any sort of enjoyable
>meanwhile singleplayer backlog grows larger
seems counter productive

>>378830468
It's fun while you get good.
Not to mention that 95% of the people who play it are straight out of the singleplayer mechwarrior audience so they'll suck just as bad as you

>>378830537
>playing game you never finish
nah
I have rougelikes for that

>>378830673
You aim to play a game you enjoy.

>>378831020
I do precisely that by ignoring online games.

>>378807454
>1600x900
>half of the screen is the UI
horrid.

>>378807124
>How is the mission design compared to MechCommander?
It's HBS and, as shown by Shadowrun games, they have no clue how to design good encounters.

>>378831215
Some of them are good though.

File: MWO Highlander.jpg (105KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1280x720px

>>378822168
>why are western mechs always poorly designed?
Western mechs are now designed better than any nipnog trash. MWO is the best thing to happen to Battletech, since they're finally ditching the horrible nipnog protodesigns.

File: mechwarrior-online-atlas-concept.jpg (1MB, 782x1150px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 782x1150px

>>378832072
I agree, s'good lookin shit. Like what an actual mech would look like.

File: Gm-custom-morishita_4.jpg (185KB, 640x720px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 640x720px

>>378831947
there are a lot more better singleplayer games. Online games are limited to few genres
>>378832072
>better designed
>still same shit as always aka put a guns on walking chassis with some bits of not making sense geometry which was taken from tanks
>REALISM!!!
anon, please.
Battletech uses same few simple design formulas which hardly make more sense than other mech designs
hell even shitty titanfall and hawken at least tried.

File: BAN907017_ml.jpg (71KB, 534x782px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 534x782px

>>378832238
>ATLAS
>good design
yeah, right. Nice shoulders, oh wait. they literally make no sense

>>378806863
Because HBS is a terrible fraud company that fucking sucks

File: A E S T H E T I C.png (4MB, 1739x803px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1739x803px

>>378832517
Sure thing bro.

>>378832332
We're not talking about whether there are more good singleplayer games than multiplayer games or vice versa, just that there are good games experiencing in both category.

File: 12 (2).jpg (327KB, 900x800px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 900x800px

>>378832767
If battletech is so great, why it is so dead and need to survive on donations?
Only good thing which technically come from Battleteach was Heavy Gear also known as wow, that show called Votoms was pretty good
>>378832906
singleplayer good games outnumber multiplayer good games in sheer amount and variety. therefore multiplayer games are negletable
aside of Gundam VS

>>378832332
You are retarded and the nipnog trash you've posted looks like complete dogshit too. The Atlas design is the way it is is because an Atlas is supposed to be very fucking good in melee.

>not making sense
That's because, again, you're retarded.

>>378832517
> Nice shoulders
Yes, they are nice, because they protect the cockpit from side shots, you fucking mongoloid. They also make it very hard to hit the Atlas CT from the side, compared to many other mechs in the actual MWO game.

>>378833434
>supposed to be very fucking good in melee.
>can only move it's shoulder like 40 degrees

File: 10679767_734955536575509_5298826466845145764_o.jpg (135KB, 552x808px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 552x808px

>>378833434
>make almost not being able to move statue
>melee = shitty slow punch with no freedom of movement period
>all battletech designs are just SCRATCHES, WEATHERING, RUST, DIRT, LOOK HOW REALISTIC WE ARE
for your notion, precisely because of that weathering - no one takes battletech designs seriously.
Why do you think that heavy weathering is applied? cause it hides all design problems and makes design look "cool"
It helps, sure, but it shouldn't be central point of every western design period.

also
>create humanoid mech
>have minimal freedom of movement of his limbs
wew lad

File: Atlas.jpg (175KB, 687x929px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 687x929px

>>378833636
You mean it can adduct/abduct i's arm from the body by some 45 degrees, you fucking retard, which is completely fine, because it doesn't need to do much else. The shoulder itself rotates properly in the sagittal plane. You're too retarded to even state your complaints properly. No wonder you like nipnog trash.

>>378833867
>make almost not being able to move statue
Another dumbfuck. Look at picrelated and kill yourself. The shoulder joint rotates properly in the sagittal plane, which means that the atlas has enough freedom to punch straight, pick up things and smash them on the enemy from above as well.

>>378832072
>Western mechs are now designed better than any nipnog trash. MWO is the best thing to happen to Battletech, since they're finally ditching the horrible nipnog protodesigns.

Dude, MWO is using Gundam design guidebook for its redrawings of mechs. Ask Alex, or that guy who happens to have the exact same style as him, who goes with said book.

They then kill them by slapping the cancerboxes on top of the designs.

>PGI cancer models
no fucking thank you

>>378834505
To be fair, Alex just makes the design and then the MWO modelers shit the cancerboxes on.

>>378834343
>because it doesn't need to do much else

Except the OP picture >>378806863 clearly shows heavy clipping on the arm as it tries to throw a very crappy punch.

File: 20150930125529368.jpg (130KB, 1200x1500px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1200x1500px

>>378834343
>pick up things
how? By falling on the ground?
>punch straight
HOLY CRAP, WHAT AGILITY
>he shoulder joint rotates properly in the sagittal plane
that's why it's never used in any game period? Even in OP pic shoulder STAYS THE SAME
it's fucking solidly attached to the body

File: not naming that babby and cent haunt me every day of my life.jpg (304KB, 1300x689px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 1300x689px

>>378834505
>They then kill them by slapping the cancerboxes on top of the designs.
That's not Alex's fault, PGI wants him to place that shit on there so their game devs can fit their cancer shit onto them. Alex's stuff used to not have anything like that on his work. Look at the old centurion, for instance. PGI went back and fucked the model up with cancer last year or the year before, I don't remember which, but at the outset of MWO his art had not been infected with the cancer yet.

Why does a weeb sperg get triggered in every battletech/mechwarrior thread?

File: megabots-mkiii-giant-fighting-robot-5.jpg (73KB, 503x670px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 503x670px

>>378832072

>>378834776
because they get no games

>>378806863
Looks like XCOM. Not that it's a bad thing...

>>378834829
>JP mech games gets released every year
>older JP mech games gets fan translated from time to time
how many games battletech has? 6?
so cute.

File: 59747129_p7_master1200.jpg (151KB, 842x595px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 842x595px

>>378834676
True, but he kind of had to design them with cancerboxes in mind from a certain point forward and it resulted in a lot of pretty bad designs.

The glaring ones aside, even just that one pic of a Phoenix Hawk made by a nip who did nothing but make the "gun" not look like a lego piece (to fit in the three or so possible lasers) made th design at least a whole grade better.

>>378834918
if you count chinese money laundering mobile games as games

File: Battlemaster vs Shitfoot.png (2MB, 1212x971px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1212x971px

>>378834505
>Gundam design guidebook for its redrawings of mechs
I don't care what they use, because the final designs look nothing like nipnog garbage. For all I know, maybe they use those books to make the designs as different from the nipnog trash as possible, LMAO.

>They then kill them
You mean they make them actually good looking by stripping out all of the retarded shit?

Picrelated. Believe it or not, it's the same mech, except the Western variant doesn't look like putrid diarrhea.

Just being cautiously reserved over the amount of things they said they'd have you do on the strategical map/base management and mech customizability.
I'm prepared to be disappointed.

File: [AiA]_SD_Gundam_MkII_-_01.avi_snapshot_03.00_[2017.05.20_22.40.45].jpg (19KB, 400x304px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 400x304px

>>378835021
last and this year just english releases just from bamco:
sRPG : SRW OG MD, SRW V, SD GGG
action: Gundam Versus, Gundam Breaker 3.

>>378834691
>how? By falling on the ground?
By tearing out lampposts and trees from the ground, you dumbfuck. You know, something it actually does in tabletop pretty much all the time. You have literally zero knowledge of what you're talking about.

>that's why it's never used in any game period?
Because there is no melee in the game, mongoloid.

>it's fucking solidly attached to the body
LMAO, you are retarded.

Also, stop posting that vomit inducing japshit, it doesn't look good and you're not helping your "argument" by posting it.

>>378835031
>Western variant doesn't look like putrid diarrhea.

Except the MWO Battlemaster redesign is one of the worst offenders and definitely in the running for one of the worst looking mechs in the game.

BTW, I adore your tenacity in going so far with this.
I know you're our good old friend Barneyfag Lee.
Same speech patterns, same beaviour and most of all, one of those guy's screencaps is his post on the old Mechwarrior Online forums so it's definitely you.

Ahem, MLP:FIM is a good show and my favorite character is the red one. She'd make for a really great Davion character.

>>378835243
>MWO Battlemaster redesign is one of the worst offenders
AHAHAHAHAH. If you think the Shitfoot in the pic I've posted earlier looks better than the MWO Battlemaster, there's nothing to discuss with you. You are literally brain fucking dead, period.

File: 1493344596958.jpg (3MB, 3000x3701px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3000x3701px

>>378835031
>using 80s show design made to sell toys and model kits and modern videogame design which has literally ZERO physical form
what a fair comparison!
>>378835205
>By tearing out lampposts and trees from the ground, you dumbfuck. You know, something it actually does in tabletop pretty much all the time. You have literally zero knowledge of what you're talking about.
You said pick up, not tearing tall objects from the ground.
moving those goalposts already?
>Because there is no melee in the game, mongoloid.
>design humanoid mech for the game
>not use humanoid functions
maybe they didn't use it cause design sucked balls for that?
>LMAO, you are retarded.
show me image where those shoulders move
I'll wait

>>378835168
and how many of those are actually new games?

>>378835351
>If you think the Shitfoot in the pic I've posted earlier looks better than the MWO Battlemaster

No, I'm saying that both look like shit, Lee.
Except one is from a super-budget design for a kids toy in the early 80s so it had some sort of decent reasons to look bad. The former has no excuse, especially with Alex Iglesias behind the stylus.

>>378806863
>Why aren't you in the beta for the new Battletech game, /v/?

because its gay and shittily made

>>378835372
>using 80s show design
They are the same fucking mech, you shitstain. The variant on the right is the nipnog trash design, the variant on the left is the superior Western design that actually looks good. Again, you have no clue what you're talking, you have no knowledge of battletech, which means you don't even know your own shitty nipnog garbage franchises.

>You said pick up
OK, keep arguing semantics, it's the only thing you can do, because you have no argument.

>maybe they didn't use it cause design sucked balls for that?
No mech can do melee in the game, it has nothing to do with design. Holy shit, you're fucking unironically retarded.

>show me image where those shoulders move
>image
>move
Yep, you're retarded alright.

this is some high grade autism shit flinging contest going on right here

File: 1479924248715.jpg (266KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 1920x1080px

>>378835443
All of them.
Fan translation of older games wise we got SD Gundam G Overworld for PSP last year as well, shit is great, two SD Gundam G games in one year in English.
I'll just say that SRW games not really tactics intensive, and breaker 3 is a simple brawler with heavy customization, still - so far JP mechs games are still being released constantly with decent enough variety.

>>378835507
>so it had some sort of decent reasons to look bad
>i-it looks like shit on purpose
AHAHAHA, weebcucks are THIS pathetic. I don't care whether your shitty nipnog designs look shit on purpose or not, all I care about is that they look like shit.

>>378835615
There's a dedicated shitposter who seems to have made it their goal to ruin every BT thread that hits /m/, I assume this is the same faggot since they're hitting the same tired notes of stolen designs, east v west aesthetics war, and absolutely no valid points so they'll bait in suckers on both sides to cause more shit.

I really miss ncsoft's mecha games, redsteel or something like that
Their games plateform disapear years ago, I dunno what they became, someone knows ?

>>378835580
>They are the same fucking mech, you shitstain. The variant on the right is the nipnog trash design, the variant on the left is the superior Western design that actually looks good. Again, you have no clue what you're talking, you have no knowledge of battletech, which means you don't even know your own shitty nipnog garbage franchises.
>same design
>using designs made 30 years apart of each other for different purposes
>same design
You are funny guy.
>No mech can do melee in the game, it has nothing to do with design. Holy shit, you're fucking unironically retarded.
So why they are humanoid again?
>doesn't realize what is static image of having shoulders moved in different position
wew lad

how much more idiotic things you can say?
>>378835709
>there must be ONLY ONE person with that opinion I dislike.
also /m/ became shit ages ago.

>>378835709
>>378835615
It's Lee, the Barneyfag.

Just post https://derpicdn.net/img/2015/12/27/1053816/large.jpeg i you have a dynamic IP and see him go full apeshit in an instant.

>>378835758
Exteel
The servers closed in 2010

>>378835797
>using designs made 30 years apart of each other for different purposes
Who the fuck cares? It's not like cunt-eyed subhumans have shat out a good mech design in the past 30 years. The rest of your post is just verbal diarrhea not even worth responding to.

Again: you don't know shit about Battletech, as you have shown in your posts, which, in turn, means you know jack shit about your own shitty nipnog trash franchises. You're like a fake weebcuck, a fucking pathetic pretender, which is even worse than being a genuine weebcuck. Neck yourself and relieve the world of your existence.

>>378834795
How's the fight going anyway, any news on the Kuratas side?

File: 4a2bd9189e33c16a3a1be822a81d6ba4.jpg (55KB, 510x710px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 510x710px

>>378835951
I wonder how does it feel to live in constant denial.
That your entire franchise built upon designs you hate so much. And that you franchise has literally zero relevance and has to survive via whale donations of most autistic people who keep lie to themself about their hobby being superior for some reason.
Even model kit scene doesn't care about your franchise, poor soul. All you have is same old miniatures of tabletop games.

You know that's it's ok to enjoy bad designs, as long you can stomach the truth that things you like are just pile of boxes and nothing else.

>>378836241
>That your entire franchise built upon designs you hate so much.
Yep, and I've always hated most the original designs. Good thing MWO rid us of the cancer. The thing that made me play MW games was the tactical team based gameplay found in multiplayer matches, that completely BTFOs any nipnog trash out of the water gameplay wise.

>literally zero relevance
>people still buy shit en masse in MWO
>2 games in development that look better any nipnog trash
LMAO, you don't know shit. Literally everything you post is pure retardation.

But it's OK, you can go back to playing your nipnog trash games with retarded designs that nobody plays.

File: laugh.jpg (18KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 600x450px

>>378836447
>Good thing MWO rid us of the cancer.
Oh man, you are gold mine. Have you bought those 250$ clan mechs too?
Please keep delivering.
http://steamcharts.com/app/342200
>24 hour peak - 1000 players
>all time peak - 4000 players
wooooooooooow

>>378836589
The fact that you post Steam Charts concurrent player estimates without realizing that MWO does not require you to use a Steam launcher to play shows just how retarded you are. You are literally BTFOing yourself, I don't need to do shit but sit back and laugh.

>>378836589
You can keep laughing but the game has been around for 5 years now, still getting major gameplay and content updates (in fact the biggest update in its history is coming up in less than two months), on top of funding a completely new singleplayer game on the side while getting royalties from Battletech.

File: Our Vision is Augmented.jpg (69KB, 680x449px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 680x449px

>>378836589
How's that new Armored Core treating you?

File: Screenshot_75.jpg (82KB, 1351x513px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1351x513px

>>378836690
>>378836734
I'm really sorry for you both, to stick for so long with your shitty P2W game, anons, you have some particular shit taste
>>378836837
it's being developed at the moment, I hope they'll drop major focus on online.

>>378836936
Kek, you're one of the scrub shitters who got into the beta, could not adapt to the evershifting meta and started to get BTFO so hard in matches on a regular basis, that you've stopped playing. It's OK, multiplayer games that take actual skill to play are not for everyone.

>>378836936
Ah the classic no argument comeback.

File: C77RRSuUwAEQs4C.jpg (126KB, 900x1369px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 900x1369px

>>378837010
>>378837037
>Unironically liking MWO
sorry for having better things to do, most of those involve actual nicely designed mechs
>MWO
>skill
I fail to see any tournaments going on, hmm, I wonder why that is. It's almost like game is unbalanced and the one who grinded the most/paid the most has the advantage.

Oh, and I think I better off playing MechAssault instead of your online garbage. It actually fun game!

>>378837313
>I fail to see any tournaments going on
There's literally one going on right now though?
https://mrbcleague.com/leaguetable

>>378837313
>It's almost like game is unbalanced
No game is perfectly balanced, the fact that you're bitching about balance instead of posting your archived stats and proving you're not a scrub shitter says all I need to know about you. Go play your casualshit nipnog arcade garbage and leave actual tactical team based mech combat to Mechwarrior games.

>>378837397
Fine, you got me there
>most popular video on official channel - 1500 views
>dozens of videos hardly breaking 100 views
oh...
oooohh...
well. have fun. I guess.

File: RathgrithRaven.jpg (109KB, 800x602px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 800x602px

>>378837546
Have fun with your World of Tanks on Legs

File: 28,802.png (764B, 87x39px) Image search: [Google]

764B, 87x39px

>>378837560
Nobody is claiming MWO is going to rival top Twitch charts or even be noticed by people who don't play the game, but you could give me the respect of trying a little harder with your shitposting.

>>378837642
>Have fun
aww thanks buddy

>>378837642
Have fun being forced nipnog arcade trash, because you can't play multiplayer pvp games due to being retarded and lacking even basic skill ;)

>>378837760
>being forced nipnog arcade trash
*being forced to play nipnog arcade trash

File: 10054195a.jpg (890KB, 986x628px) Image search: [Google]

890KB, 986x628px

>>378837664
Okay, I was wrong about tournament scene
you can have your GOTCHA moment all you want. My loss.
>>378837749
I really liked my time with MWO, but just didn't stick around for long. Dropped by from time to time, but that's about it.
My overall increased aggressiveness is mostly cause of this insecure faggot >>378837760
I do actually look forward that singleplayer game they making using same engine and tactics in OP.
Designs still suck balls tho.

>>378811448
>clanner
it's a kid who has never played tabletop brudda.

File: why daddy why!.jpg (259KB, 728x910px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 728x910px

>tfw you used to run a battletech arena with 16 pods
>tfw the place was closing down and had to sell everything
>had the chance to buy a pod for a grand because the TV was busted and some of the switches didn't light up or work anymore
>had the ability and knowledge to fix it for pretty cheap
>shrugged it off because money was tight


The last time I saw one for sale it went for like 7 grand, I also had the chance to invest 9 grand into Facebook when stocks were 23 USD. I'd be in a good spot if I had grown some balls and took the risks.

>>378838116
Or you'd be in a lot worse shit for all the other risks you took that didn't pay out.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (125KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1920x1080px

>>378838116
>>378838165
/This

You should approach this shit logically. If you have a 99% chance to get kicked in the balls/cunny versus a 1% chance to win a billion dollars when pressing the button and decide to not do so while some faggot runs in, presses it and gets the billion... that is not a "bad choice".

That is the correct choice and how you rationally view decisions. As long as you make the correct choice within the scope of what you can know, you've made the right choice, even if the suboptimal one proved to be more beneficial in the end.

There's a million ways purchasing such shit while short on money could get you on the street or at least make a slash through your budgets. The weighed risk was most likely not worth it.

>>378838116
>Facebook
I'm still angry at myself over not buying Bitcoin 5 years ago